LSjuanabee

Who thinks this is a kickass lookin stang?!? http://www.fquick.com/videos/viewvideo.php?id=93

skinjob

Except for the 10 foot tall wing I quite like it. On a mostly un-related note.. do any of you guys sick of these videos meant to show a car, or a burnout, or an exhaust and some idiot adds a bunch of music and affects, and still photos and all sorts of crap. The amature video producers need to die and just show the damn car in the video. (I'm probably just picky.. hell I get mad when a hot girl is sprawled across a good ride blocking my view of it).

-J

cmsurfr22

agreed....i would have traded the music for the sound of the car and i would have traded dumb still pictures for an actual video.

likemike99

I like it, I agree though-the wing is way to high. is that the 5.6 GT40 engine in it?

bikadur

its the 5.0 Cammer motor, and the GT40 has a 5.4 in it.

05 GT Black Magic

lose the the wing and it looks good to me

callahan

Japanese Mustang?

GGIII

-.-

...

That's the GT-R, the concept version of the FR500C Mustang Racecar. The wing is 100% functional and 100% necessary.

ThisBlood147

+1 You guys are kidding right? That's the 2004 GT-R concept mustang.......the one that was a test vessel for some of the GT500 ideas. It was built as a road racer.........hence the large functional wing.

[IMG]local://upfiles/28087/F013F62F18574C589DFB3B146DAD121A.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]local://upfiles/28087/448CFE196CF745E28E0464EEB227C802.jpg[/IMG]

skinjob

I'm sure sooner or later this will boil down to a flame war but what the hell.. Is the wing really that functional on these cars? Most every picture I've seen on an FR500C on an actual race track has been without wing. I only see those big wings in show-rooms. I'm no racing expert.. and I know some cars do have a fully functional gigantic rear wing, but do we really need them on Mustangs?

-J