Notices
GT S197 General Discussion This section is for technical discussions pertaining specifically to the V8 variation of the 2005 and newer Ford Mustang.

monte carlo ss

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-08-2007, 02:20 AM
  #11  
johnnyv8
4th Gear Member
 
johnnyv8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,609
Default RE: monte carlo ss

ORIGINAL: acascianelli

2000-2003 Monte Carlo SS's had the NA 3.8L, 200hp/225lbft. I think they ran high 15's/low 16's. Even if was turbocharged, it would take fair amount of work to get it into GT territory. He's full of it. Hell, a S197 V6 could probably still beat a 2004-2005 Monte Carlo SS with the 3.8SC.

+ 1
johnnyv8 is offline  
Old 03-08-2007, 12:56 PM
  #12  
Arrow
2nd Gear Member
 
Arrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 222
Default RE: monte carlo ss

ORIGINAL: Feng Houzi

2000-2003, not sure what year, monte carlo ss. We'd kill em right? Guy at work claims to have taken a GT. Im convinced it was a V6. Any thoughts?
They look fast and racey, but they're nothing. Even a V6 'Stang could beat one without much effort. There's a bunch of those around where I live (outside WDC) and they know their place.

Edit: Having some coffee, I remembered that while the Monte Carlo sucks, the SS model has a V8 rated at 300 hp, so yeah, I could probably see it taking on the V6 community...but I still stand behind it getting wasted by any GT out there.
Arrow is offline  
Old 03-08-2007, 04:27 PM
  #13  
acascianelli
5th Gear Member
 
acascianelli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Posts: 4,409
Default RE: monte carlo ss

ORIGINAL: mustangman02232
btw, a old single port V6 and a NA "SS" are a drivers race[8D]
I'd rather have an older Monte Carlo Z34 with the twin cam 3.4L, over a newer SS with a NA 3.8L.

The newer SS's with the LS4 V8's run mid-low 14's, IIRC a stock V6 Mustang run a high 14 at best.
acascianelli is offline  
Old 03-08-2007, 04:35 PM
  #14  
chupac
3rd Gear Member
 
chupac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location:
Posts: 630
Default RE: monte carlo ss

The one I ran ito was a 5.3 v8 seen the kid running around thinking he's hot s**t. He rolled up on me at the light, I wasn't going to do it but finally gave in. I had at least 3 cars before I even got into 3rd.
chupac is offline  
Old 03-09-2007, 01:01 AM
  #15  
pastor_ice43
2nd Gear Member
 
pastor_ice43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 270
Default RE: monte carlo ss

ORIGINAL: acascianelli

2000-2003 Monte Carlo SS's had the NA 3.8L, 200hp/225lbft. I think they ran high 15's/low 16's. Even if was turbocharged, it would take fair amount of work to get it into GT territory. He's full of it. Hell, a S197 V6 could probably still beat a 2004-2005 Monte Carlo SS with the 3.8SC.
What? A good turbo charger will get you 50% more hp. And I'm not sure what year it was (I know it was no later then 2006) Monte Carlo SS's were upgraded to 305hp.
pastor_ice43 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fastbackford351
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
3
10-01-2015 12:24 PM
fastbackford351
Classic Mustang General Discussion
2
09-12-2015 09:42 AM
sprostang
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
25
08-17-2012 10:34 PM
eric12345678
Street/Strip
2
01-19-2006 07:03 AM
Silver Ponys
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
12
10-19-2005 06:02 AM



Quick Reply: monte carlo ss



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:54 PM.