monte carlo ss
4th Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,609
From: New Jersey
RE: monte carlo ss
ORIGINAL: acascianelli
2000-2003 Monte Carlo SS's had the NA 3.8L, 200hp/225lbft. I think they ran high 15's/low 16's. Even if was turbocharged, it would take fair amount of work to get it into GT territory. He's full of it. Hell, a S197 V6 could probably still beat a 2004-2005 Monte Carlo SS with the 3.8SC.
2000-2003 Monte Carlo SS's had the NA 3.8L, 200hp/225lbft. I think they ran high 15's/low 16's. Even if was turbocharged, it would take fair amount of work to get it into GT territory. He's full of it. Hell, a S197 V6 could probably still beat a 2004-2005 Monte Carlo SS with the 3.8SC.
+ 1
2nd Gear Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 222
RE: monte carlo ss
ORIGINAL: Feng Houzi
2000-2003, not sure what year, monte carlo ss. We'd kill em right? Guy at work claims to have taken a GT. Im convinced it was a V6. Any thoughts?
2000-2003, not sure what year, monte carlo ss. We'd kill em right? Guy at work claims to have taken a GT. Im convinced it was a V6. Any thoughts?
Edit: Having some coffee, I remembered that while the Monte Carlo sucks, the SS model has a V8 rated at 300 hp, so yeah, I could probably see it taking on the V6 community...but I still stand behind it getting wasted by any GT out there.
5th Gear Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,409
From: Sterling Heights, MI
RE: monte carlo ss
ORIGINAL: mustangman02232
btw, a old single port V6 and a NA "SS" are a drivers race[8D]
btw, a old single port V6 and a NA "SS" are a drivers race[8D]
The newer SS's with the LS4 V8's run mid-low 14's, IIRC a stock V6 Mustang run a high 14 at best.
3rd Gear Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 630
From:
RE: monte carlo ss
The one I ran ito was a 5.3 v8 seen the kid running around thinking he's hot s**t. He rolled up on me at the light, I wasn't going to do it but finally gave in. I had at least 3 cars before I even got into 3rd.
2nd Gear Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 270
RE: monte carlo ss
ORIGINAL: acascianelli
2000-2003 Monte Carlo SS's had the NA 3.8L, 200hp/225lbft. I think they ran high 15's/low 16's. Even if was turbocharged, it would take fair amount of work to get it into GT territory. He's full of it. Hell, a S197 V6 could probably still beat a 2004-2005 Monte Carlo SS with the 3.8SC.
2000-2003 Monte Carlo SS's had the NA 3.8L, 200hp/225lbft. I think they ran high 15's/low 16's. Even if was turbocharged, it would take fair amount of work to get it into GT territory. He's full of it. Hell, a S197 V6 could probably still beat a 2004-2005 Monte Carlo SS with the 3.8SC.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fastbackford351
Classic Mustang General Discussion
2
Sep 12, 2015 09:42 AM
