1/4 question
07-03-2007, 04:48 PM
#21
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 11,278
RE: 1/4 question
That's a fast trap speed in the 1/8 for just having a CAI and no tune. What CAI? What was the weather like where you ran that time? My fast 1/8 trap was 81 at like 8.89 or something close, but it was in the 80's when I ran and I also suck at shifting gears.
ORIGINAL: wingman75
I have an auto and all I have is a CAI. I do not have a tune and I have stock Perellis. I'm happy with what she ran but I am not satisfied. I am getting a tune, 3.73 gears and a 1pc. Spyder driveshaft this week.
I'm car #213 on this time slip. I got beat by my friends V6 but he is supercharged and I was pleased with a 13.4 anyway.
ORIGINAL: craezjo
how fast would a stock gt auto run
how fast would a stock gt auto run
I'm car #213 on this time slip. I got beat by my friends V6 but he is supercharged and I was pleased with a 13.4 anyway.
07-03-2007, 05:31 PM
#22
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Posts: 3,792
RE: 1/4 question
ORIGINAL: moosestang
That's a fast trap speed in the 1/8 for just having a CAI and no tune. What CAI? What was the weather like where you ran that time? My fast 1/8 trap was 81 at like 8.89 or something close, but it was in the 80's when I ran and I also suck at shifting gears.
That's a fast trap speed in the 1/8 for just having a CAI and no tune. What CAI? What was the weather like where you ran that time? My fast 1/8 trap was 81 at like 8.89 or something close, but it was in the 80's when I ran and I also suck at shifting gears.
01-14-2008, 11:41 PM
#23
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 632
RE: 1/4 question
ORIGINAL: craezjo
i was bout to trade in my 06 4.0 autofor a 07 manual gt, but i was just wondering what kind of 1/4 mile times id be lookin at i plan on keeping it stock and i got thefactory 3:55 gearing option. so i was wondering what would you guys estimate the 1/4 mile to be?
i was bout to trade in my 06 4.0 autofor a 07 manual gt, but i was just wondering what kind of 1/4 mile times id be lookin at i plan on keeping it stock and i got thefactory 3:55 gearing option. so i was wondering what would you guys estimate the 1/4 mile to be?
You have to take into account alot of people on herefib with their1/4 times, if you look in the timeslips section alot of people do not have an actual timeslip scan, much like the dyno #s there is some BS goin on, a totally stock 05-08 GT will not get into the 12s period, nor will it get into the 12s with a simple CAI and tune !!even really low 13s.The car and driver test 13.5 1/4 mile was with a professional driver on a perfect track with perfect conditions, with all my mods I am running low 13s and trust me a RT of .080does not leave alot of room for driver error!! lolI am just saying don't judge your times or HP numbers by what people say on here, get your baseline #s and go from there. BTW a stock manual is faster than a stock AUTO so you have a head start I didn't get !!! lol
01-15-2008, 12:02 AM
#24
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,602
RE: 1/4 question
ORIGINAL: s197richie
my last quarter-mile discussion over in street/strip almost got me tossed off MF so I'm gonna sit the rest of this one out as far as that goes...still say you WILL mod, we all do it...I myself remember driving the car home and saying "it's perfect...and I'm gonna keep it all FORD!" yeah, right...
ORIGINAL: shooter23
13.5?? on stock...yea right...he'll be looking more like 13.7-13.8...if hes good
13.5?? on stock...yea right...he'll be looking more like 13.7-13.8...if hes good
01-15-2008, 12:11 AM
#25
I ♥ Acer
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location:
Posts: 268
RE: 1/4 question
ORIGINAL: shooter23
Yea, check my sig...and my best is a 13.3...and i'm sitting in and around 300 (never dynoed) so i dont know exaclty...
Yea, check my sig...and my best is a 13.3...and i'm sitting in and around 300 (never dynoed) so i dont know exaclty...
wow,that car is clean! I like the all business no non-sense attitude of the front.
but yeah,what do you guys think an intake/exhuast,4:10s and converter will run on the track?
street tires?
01-15-2008, 01:12 AM
#26
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location:
Posts: 6,414
RE: 1/4 question
ORIGINAL: desslok40
You have to take into account alot of people on herefib with their1/4 times, if you look in the timeslips section alot of people do not have an actual timeslip scan, much like the dyno #s there is some BS goin on, a totally stock 05-08 GT will not get into the 12s period, nor will it get into the 12s with a simple CAI and tune !!even really low 13s.The car and driver test 13.5 1/4 mile was with a professional driver on a perfect track with perfect conditions, with all my mods I am running low 13s and trust me a RT of .080does not leave alot of room for driver error!! lolI am just saying don't judge your times or HP numbers by what people say on here, get your baseline #s and go from there. BTW a stock manual is faster than a stock AUTO so you have a head start I didn't get !!! lol
You have to take into account alot of people on herefib with their1/4 times, if you look in the timeslips section alot of people do not have an actual timeslip scan, much like the dyno #s there is some BS goin on, a totally stock 05-08 GT will not get into the 12s period, nor will it get into the 12s with a simple CAI and tune !!even really low 13s.The car and driver test 13.5 1/4 mile was with a professional driver on a perfect track with perfect conditions, with all my mods I am running low 13s and trust me a RT of .080does not leave alot of room for driver error!! lolI am just saying don't judge your times or HP numbers by what people say on here, get your baseline #s and go from there. BTW a stock manual is faster than a stock AUTO so you have a head start I didn't get !!! lol
01-15-2008, 11:30 AM
#27
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 632
RE: 1/4 question
ORIGINAL: 06Saleen3V
There is a member on these forums that ran in the 12's with a CAI/tune. He posted his timeslip and everything...kind of hard to fib that if you ask me.
ORIGINAL: desslok40
You have to take into account alot of people on herefib with their1/4 times, if you look in the timeslips section alot of people do not have an actual timeslip scan, much like the dyno #s there is some BS goin on, a totally stock 05-08 GT will not get into the 12s period, nor will it get into the 12s with a simple CAI and tune !!even really low 13s.The car and driver test 13.5 1/4 mile was with a professional driver on a perfect track with perfect conditions, with all my mods I am running low 13s and trust me a RT of .080does not leave alot of room for driver error!! lolI am just saying don't judge your times or HP numbers by what people say on here, get your baseline #s and go from there. BTW a stock manual is faster than a stock AUTO so you have a head start I didn't get !!! lol
You have to take into account alot of people on herefib with their1/4 times, if you look in the timeslips section alot of people do not have an actual timeslip scan, much like the dyno #s there is some BS goin on, a totally stock 05-08 GT will not get into the 12s period, nor will it get into the 12s with a simple CAI and tune !!even really low 13s.The car and driver test 13.5 1/4 mile was with a professional driver on a perfect track with perfect conditions, with all my mods I am running low 13s and trust me a RT of .080does not leave alot of room for driver error!! lolI am just saying don't judge your times or HP numbers by what people say on here, get your baseline #s and go from there. BTW a stock manual is faster than a stock AUTO so you have a head start I didn't get !!! lol
The track he goes to must have clock issues, seen it plenty of times before, hell one time I got a slip that told me I went 11.9 lol It is impossible to get in the 12s with these cars with just a CAI and tune, period.
01-15-2008, 11:46 AM
#28
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 1,005
RE: 1/4 question
ORIGINAL: craezjo
how fast would a stock gt auto run
how fast would a stock gt auto run
A stock GT, probably somewhere in the low 14's. I havent heard of a stock auto GT getting into 13's without mods. But, someone prove me wrong...?
01-15-2008, 12:15 PM
#29
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location:
Posts: 6,414
RE: 1/4 question
ORIGINAL: desslok40
The track he goes to must have clock issues, seen it plenty of times before, hell one time I got a slip that told me I went 11.9 lol It is impossible to get in the 12s with these cars with just a CAI and tune, period.
ORIGINAL: 06Saleen3V
There is a member on these forums that ran in the 12's with a CAI/tune. He posted his timeslip and everything...kind of hard to fib that if you ask me.
ORIGINAL: desslok40
You have to take into account alot of people on herefib with their1/4 times, if you look in the timeslips section alot of people do not have an actual timeslip scan, much like the dyno #s there is some BS goin on, a totally stock 05-08 GT will not get into the 12s period, nor will it get into the 12s with a simple CAI and tune !!even really low 13s.The car and driver test 13.5 1/4 mile was with a professional driver on a perfect track with perfect conditions, with all my mods I am running low 13s and trust me a RT of .080does not leave alot of room for driver error!! lolI am just saying don't judge your times or HP numbers by what people say on here, get your baseline #s and go from there. BTW a stock manual is faster than a stock AUTO so you have a head start I didn't get !!! lol
You have to take into account alot of people on herefib with their1/4 times, if you look in the timeslips section alot of people do not have an actual timeslip scan, much like the dyno #s there is some BS goin on, a totally stock 05-08 GT will not get into the 12s period, nor will it get into the 12s with a simple CAI and tune !!even really low 13s.The car and driver test 13.5 1/4 mile was with a professional driver on a perfect track with perfect conditions, with all my mods I am running low 13s and trust me a RT of .080does not leave alot of room for driver error!! lolI am just saying don't judge your times or HP numbers by what people say on here, get your baseline #s and go from there. BTW a stock manual is faster than a stock AUTO so you have a head start I didn't get !!! lol
The track he goes to must have clock issues, seen it plenty of times before, hell one time I got a slip that told me I went 11.9 lol It is impossible to get in the 12s with these cars with just a CAI and tune, period.
01-15-2008, 01:22 PM
#30
4th Gear Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,249
RE: 1/4 question
I'm at 5000'. Stock I ran a 15.1. After CAI/tune I ran a 14.6. That's typical for this altitude.
I seen other Mustangs run from 14.9-15.5. With my CAI/tune, I beat a manual pretty easily.
Had him by 3 cars up to about80 mph. 2nd and 3rd shift so damn hard. At sea level I bet I'm
13.6 easy.
I seen other Mustangs run from 14.9-15.5. With my CAI/tune, I beat a manual pretty easily.
Had him by 3 cars up to about80 mph. 2nd and 3rd shift so damn hard. At sea level I bet I'm
13.6 easy.