1/4 question - Page 3 - MustangForums.com

Notices
GT S197 General Discussion This section is for technical discussions pertaining specifically to the V8 variation of the 2005 and newer Ford Mustang.

1/4 question

Reply

 
 
 
Old 07-03-2007, 04:48 PM
  #21  
moosestang
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 11,278
Default RE: 1/4 question

That's a fast trap speed in the 1/8 for just having a CAI and no tune. What CAI? What was the weather like where you ran that time? My fast 1/8 trap was 81 at like 8.89 or something close, but it was in the 80's when I ran and I also suck at shifting gears.


ORIGINAL: wingman75

ORIGINAL: craezjo
how fast would a stock gt auto run
I have an auto and all I have is a CAI. I do not have a tune and I have stock Perellis. I'm happy with what she ran but I am not satisfied. I am getting a tune, 3.73 gears and a 1pc. Spyder driveshaft this week.

I'm car #213 on this time slip. I got beat by my friends V6 but he is supercharged and I was pleased with a 13.4 anyway.

moosestang is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2007, 05:31 PM
  #22  
wingman75
5th Gear Member
 
wingman75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Posts: 3,792
Default RE: 1/4 question

ORIGINAL: moosestang
That's a fast trap speed in the 1/8 for just having a CAI and no tune. What CAI? What was the weather like where you ran that time? My fast 1/8 trap was 81 at like 8.89 or something close, but it was in the 80's when I ran and I also suck at shifting gears.
It was in the mid to high 70s and calm wind that day. Its a Granatelli CAI.
wingman75 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2008, 11:41 PM
  #23  
desslok40
3rd Gear Member
 
desslok40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 632
Default RE: 1/4 question

ORIGINAL: craezjo

i was bout to trade in my 06 4.0 autofor a 07 manual gt, but i was just wondering what kind of 1/4 mile times id be lookin at i plan on keeping it stock and i got thefactory 3:55 gearing option. so i was wondering what would you guys estimate the 1/4 mile to be?


You have to take into account alot of people on herefib with their1/4 times, if you look in the timeslips section alot of people do not have an actual timeslip scan, much like the dyno #s there is some BS goin on, a totally stock 05-08 GT will not get into the 12s period, nor will it get into the 12s with a simple CAI and tune !!even really low 13s.The car and driver test 13.5 1/4 mile was with a professional driver on a perfect track with perfect conditions, with all my mods I am running low 13s and trust me a RT of .080does not leave alot of room for driver error!! lolI am just saying don't judge your times or HP numbers by what people say on here, get your baseline #s and go from there. BTW a stock manual is faster than a stock AUTO so you have a head start I didn't get !!! lol

desslok40 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 12:02 AM
  #24  
white07
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,602
Default RE: 1/4 question

ORIGINAL: s197richie

ORIGINAL: shooter23

13.5?? on stock...yea right...he'll be looking more like 13.7-13.8...if hes good
my last quarter-mile discussion over in street/strip almost got me tossed off MF so I'm gonna sit the rest of this one out as far as that goes...still say you WILL mod, we all do it...I myself remember driving the car home and saying "it's perfect...and I'm gonna keep it all FORD!" yeah, right...
I said that I was going to put all FRPP parts on it but that went real well. I have 0 FRPP parts on my car. lol
white07 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 12:11 AM
  #25  
Thief_of_Hearts
I ♥ Acer
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location:
Posts: 268
Default RE: 1/4 question

ORIGINAL: shooter23

Yea, check my sig...and my best is a 13.3...and i'm sitting in and around 300 (never dynoed) so i dont know exaclty...


wow,that car is clean! I like the all business no non-sense attitude of the front.

but yeah,what do you guys think an intake/exhuast,4:10s and converter will run on the track?
street tires?

Thief_of_Hearts is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 01:12 AM
  #26  
06Saleen3V
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location:
Posts: 6,414
Default RE: 1/4 question

ORIGINAL: desslok40

You have to take into account alot of people on herefib with their1/4 times, if you look in the timeslips section alot of people do not have an actual timeslip scan, much like the dyno #s there is some BS goin on, a totally stock 05-08 GT will not get into the 12s period, nor will it get into the 12s with a simple CAI and tune !!even really low 13s.The car and driver test 13.5 1/4 mile was with a professional driver on a perfect track with perfect conditions, with all my mods I am running low 13s and trust me a RT of .080does not leave alot of room for driver error!! lolI am just saying don't judge your times or HP numbers by what people say on here, get your baseline #s and go from there. BTW a stock manual is faster than a stock AUTO so you have a head start I didn't get !!! lol

There is a member on these forums that ran in the 12's with a CAI/tune. He posted his timeslip and everything...kind of hard to fib that if you ask me.
06Saleen3V is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 11:30 AM
  #27  
desslok40
3rd Gear Member
 
desslok40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 632
Default RE: 1/4 question

ORIGINAL: 06Saleen3V

ORIGINAL: desslok40

You have to take into account alot of people on herefib with their1/4 times, if you look in the timeslips section alot of people do not have an actual timeslip scan, much like the dyno #s there is some BS goin on, a totally stock 05-08 GT will not get into the 12s period, nor will it get into the 12s with a simple CAI and tune !!even really low 13s.The car and driver test 13.5 1/4 mile was with a professional driver on a perfect track with perfect conditions, with all my mods I am running low 13s and trust me a RT of .080does not leave alot of room for driver error!! lolI am just saying don't judge your times or HP numbers by what people say on here, get your baseline #s and go from there. BTW a stock manual is faster than a stock AUTO so you have a head start I didn't get !!! lol

There is a member on these forums that ran in the 12's with a CAI/tune. He posted his timeslip and everything...kind of hard to fib that if you ask me.


The track he goes to must have clock issues, seen it plenty of times before, hell one time I got a slip that told me I went 11.9 lol It is impossible to get in the 12s with these cars with just a CAI and tune, period.
desslok40 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 11:46 AM
  #28  
tonkpils555666sas
4th Gear Member
 
tonkpils555666sas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 1,005
Default RE: 1/4 question

ORIGINAL: craezjo

how fast would a stock gt auto run
not fast at all... I had some mods done a while back, JBA shorties, Magnaflow catback, 3.73 gears, intake and canned tune (and lowered with steeda springs). The car ran a 14.1 at I believe 102 or 103? This run was on street tires, but still, I wasnt gonna hit any faster times than that.

A stock GT, probably somewhere in the low 14's. I havent heard of a stock auto GT getting into 13's without mods. But, someone prove me wrong...?
tonkpils555666sas is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 12:15 PM
  #29  
06Saleen3V
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location:
Posts: 6,414
Default RE: 1/4 question

ORIGINAL: desslok40

ORIGINAL: 06Saleen3V

ORIGINAL: desslok40

You have to take into account alot of people on herefib with their1/4 times, if you look in the timeslips section alot of people do not have an actual timeslip scan, much like the dyno #s there is some BS goin on, a totally stock 05-08 GT will not get into the 12s period, nor will it get into the 12s with a simple CAI and tune !!even really low 13s.The car and driver test 13.5 1/4 mile was with a professional driver on a perfect track with perfect conditions, with all my mods I am running low 13s and trust me a RT of .080does not leave alot of room for driver error!! lolI am just saying don't judge your times or HP numbers by what people say on here, get your baseline #s and go from there. BTW a stock manual is faster than a stock AUTO so you have a head start I didn't get !!! lol

There is a member on these forums that ran in the 12's with a CAI/tune. He posted his timeslip and everything...kind of hard to fib that if you ask me.


The track he goes to must have clock issues, seen it plenty of times before, hell one time I got a slip that told me I went 11.9 lol It is impossible to get in the 12s with these cars with just a CAI and tune, period.
His name is GeneK I believe and he was consistently running 13.4-13.5 stock and ran 12.9xx's with his CAI/tune and stock tires. Dont believe it? Fine, doesnt affect me....
06Saleen3V is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 01:22 PM
  #30  
grampa_stang
4th Gear Member
 
grampa_stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,249
Default RE: 1/4 question

I'm at 5000'. Stock I ran a 15.1. After CAI/tune I ran a 14.6. That's typical for this altitude.
I seen other Mustangs run from 14.9-15.5. With my CAI/tune, I beat a manual pretty easily.
Had him by 3 cars up to about80 mph. 2nd and 3rd shift so damn hard. At sea level I bet I'm
13.6 easy.
grampa_stang is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply
 
 
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dokilar
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
15
10-16-2015 08:13 PM
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
3
10-02-2015 08:06 AM
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
0
10-01-2015 10:29 AM
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
0
10-01-2015 09:21 AM
treesloth
New Member Area
4
09-28-2015 07:03 AM

Forum Jump

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Advertising
Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory