KB 2.6L INSTALLED Pics W/Dyno sheet
#31
RE: KB 2.6L INSTALLED Pics W/Dyno sheet
I have a 2 1/8" pulley now...I put it on ONCE...I swapped out internals a while ago, and with the smaller pulley that car is just useless on the street for just driving. However last night, I did put it on and retune it. The guys at the local weekly club meet (which are mostly tuners) didn't seem to notice the 30 other turbo'd S2000s rolling up while they were listening to the KenneBell spooling up. I haven't dynoed the smaller pulley yet but KB claims 530RWHP and 485RWTQ.
For now though till I'm used to the power I'm sticking with the 3.5" pulley...I don't want to kill the car...or myself
For now though till I'm used to the power I'm sticking with the 3.5" pulley...I don't want to kill the car...or myself
#32
RE: KB 2.6L INSTALLED Pics W/Dyno sheet
ORIGINAL: lldsandsll
good stuff! i second the notion ona smaller pully!!!! get those brakes tho. btw, i'll bet that clutch takes some getting used to.
good stuff! i second the notion ona smaller pully!!!! get those brakes tho. btw, i'll bet that clutch takes some getting used to.
#33
RE: KB 2.6L INSTALLED Pics W/Dyno sheet
thats sick!!!! im jealous! i was told in another post that if i got the 2.6l KB i would need a dif hood but after looking at your pics i would guess they were wrong. nice car bro!
Nathan
Nathan
#35
RE: KB 2.6L INSTALLED Pics W/Dyno sheet
Awesome! Those Kenne Bell's look awesome under the hood all polished and gleaming. Nice numbers too!
Nothing quite like driving a SC'd car. I had a Turbo car before this, and while Turbos may be "more efficient", nothing beats driving a car that sounds like a jet taking off
Nothing quite like driving a SC'd car. I had a Turbo car before this, and while Turbos may be "more efficient", nothing beats driving a car that sounds like a jet taking off
#36
RE: KB 2.6L INSTALLED Pics W/Dyno sheet
ORIGINAL: 07BOSSGT_S197
I have a 2 1/8" pulley now...I put it on ONCE...I swapped out internals a while ago, and with the smaller pulley that car is just useless on the street for just driving. However last night, I did put it on and retune it. The guys at the local weekly club meet (which are mostly tuners) didn't seem to notice the 30 other turbo'd S2000s rolling up while they were listening to the KenneBell spooling up. I haven't dynoed the smaller pulley yet but KB claims 530RWHP and 485RWTQ.
For now though till I'm used to the power I'm sticking with the 3.5" pulley...I don't want to kill the car...or myself
I have a 2 1/8" pulley now...I put it on ONCE...I swapped out internals a while ago, and with the smaller pulley that car is just useless on the street for just driving. However last night, I did put it on and retune it. The guys at the local weekly club meet (which are mostly tuners) didn't seem to notice the 30 other turbo'd S2000s rolling up while they were listening to the KenneBell spooling up. I haven't dynoed the smaller pulley yet but KB claims 530RWHP and 485RWTQ.
For now though till I'm used to the power I'm sticking with the 3.5" pulley...I don't want to kill the car...or myself
My car is set up low compression also 8.4:1 so you'd probably see even more boost than me with those pulleys. I wouldn't run more than 10 psi before upgrading your fuel system IMO.
#40
RE: KB 2.6L INSTALLED Pics W/Dyno sheet
Those numbers with the 6 psi pulley is great! I only make 454 RWHP on my whipple with 11 psi....congrats! Luke ...use the force (d induction)...LOL
ORIGINAL: 07BOSSGT_S197
Christ!! Lemme get used to 6psi!!! I already have a Centerforce Dual friction stage 3... I REALLY need brakes though first. All go and no stop. And I can already start smelling the organics from the stock pads frying up.
Christ!! Lemme get used to 6psi!!! I already have a Centerforce Dual friction stage 3... I REALLY need brakes though first. All go and no stop. And I can already start smelling the organics from the stock pads frying up.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post