GT S197 General Discussion This section is for technical discussions pertaining specifically to the V8 variation of the 2005 and newer Ford Mustang.

FI vs NA: A cost breakdown.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 02:44 PM
  #21  
Mishri's Avatar
Mishri
Mish-ogynist
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,784
From: Helena, MT
Default RE: FI vs NA: A cost breakdown.

hmm.. does the exauhst or other parts from the NA help with the FI? eventually I'll probably get FI so thinking to tide me over for ayear or 2 id like to do some mods (intake+tune = must) wont to the UD pullies... perhaps i should be asking this in a different thread though hehe.. (sort of off topic)
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 02:59 PM
  #22  
howarmat's Avatar
howarmat
s197 Junkie
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,088
From: IN
Default RE: FI vs NA: A cost breakdown.

Yes LTs and midpipe will get even better gains with FI
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 03:28 PM
  #23  
modaddict's Avatar
modaddict
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,699
From:
Default RE: FI vs NA: A cost breakdown.

I see your point and it is interesting and although not completely accurate, I'll admit it's close.

The major factor you are leaving out though that should be considered IMO is this...

The N/A scenario you showed above is IT. That's all - that's where you're at. With the FI scenario, simply adding a $45 pulley will net you more power so it's not a fair comparison of $$ to HP ratio.

And let's not even think about putting up the extra funds for a custom intake, manifold, meter, and forged rotating assembly. Now you'd have to do a $$$ to HP comparison in the 700 rwhp range which will be much more favorable to the FI scenario.


The bottom line is with FI you have options available in the future for more and with an n/a set-up you are at your ceiling instantly. Trust me, I have ben messing with cars a long time and if one thing is true - it's this...

Once you start modding and going faster - you ALWAYS want to go faster. If anyone says otherwise, they are either - A. Lying or B. never actually racing or pushing their car.

Just some other things to think about...

Peace.


Old Dec 13, 2007 | 03:37 PM
  #24  
MustangGT0405's Avatar
MustangGT0405
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,276
From: Orlando, FL
Default RE: FI vs NA: A cost breakdown.

This is an intersting topic that I have gone through on paper a bunch or times. Although I never go as far as heads or cam as I have a hard time paying more to install something than to buy it.

I actually did it today just to see if I wanted to stay N/A or go supercharged. The plus of N/A is you buy stuff slowly, S/C is all at once.

UD pulleys - $200
Deletes - $140
Mac LT with o/r prochamber 1 5/8 - $850
Intake & Tune & Tuner- $650
Alum D/S - $520
Rad Support, sway bar delete - $250
-------------------------------
$2610 for about 60 rwhp + less wieght (approx 325rwhp) = $43.50 per hp and high 12's


Brenspeed Stage 2 for $5400
-----------------------------------------------
$5400 for 130rwhp (approx 425rwhp)= $41.50 per hp and runs low 12's


But if you think about $2890 you are getting 70 more hp so that extra 70 is $41.30 more per hp that is much more expensive to get n/a.

So do you want high 12's or low 12's?


Old Dec 13, 2007 | 04:40 PM
  #25  
modaddict's Avatar
modaddict
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,699
From:
Default RE: FI vs NA: A cost breakdown.

Geez, I ran mid 11's on the stock motor for about a year with no problems so you certainly can be faster than 'low 12's" so again, your scenario is not accurate.

I made 526 rwhp with the complete stock longblock and a vortech at 13 psi for a year so compare that $$ to rwhp. With the vortech and all other bolt-on's - I was probably out of pocket around 6K for mid 11's...
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 04:40 PM
  #26  
zkiller's Avatar
zkiller
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,726
From: Illinois
Default RE: FI vs NA: A cost breakdown.

Howarmat-
Long tubes will not work with a turbo though
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 04:55 PM
  #27  
howarmat's Avatar
howarmat
s197 Junkie
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,088
From: IN
Default RE: FI vs NA: A cost breakdown.

ORIGINAL: zkiller

Howarmat-
Long tubes will not work with a turbo though
true, i did see him specify s/c or turbo.....so

LTs will give even more HP with a S/C over N/A setup
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 05:06 PM
  #28  
CataclysmGT's Avatar
CataclysmGT
Thread Starter
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,062
From:
Default RE: FI vs NA: A cost breakdown.

Kenne Bell says otherwise.

LT exhaust is used to improve flow to achieve better scavenging, which means a larger air/fuel charge in the cylinder. With FI, you have a forced air charge, which already improves scavenging by pushing the exhaust gasses out. Therefore to my thinking (and Kenne Bell agrees with this) there is LESS of a gain with improved exhaust flow with FI, unless the entire exhaust system cannot handle the FI systems combustion gas volume.
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 05:13 PM
  #29  
06Saleen3V's Avatar
06Saleen3V
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,414
From:
Default RE: FI vs NA: A cost breakdown.

ORIGINAL: MustangGT0405

This is an intersting topic that I have gone through on paper a bunch or times. Although I never go as far as heads or cam as I have a hard time paying more to install something than to buy it.

I actually did it today just to see if I wanted to stay N/A or go supercharged. The plus of N/A is you buy stuff slowly, S/C is all at once.

UD pulleys - $200
Deletes - $140
Mac LT with o/r prochamber 1 5/8 - $850
Intake & Tune & Tuner- $650
Alum D/S - $520
Rad Support, sway bar delete - $250
-------------------------------
$2610 for about 60 rwhp + less wieght (approx 325rwhp) = $43.50 per hp and high 12's


Brenspeed Stage 2 for $5400
-----------------------------------------------
$5400 for 130rwhp (approx 425rwhp)= $41.50 per hp and runs low 12's


But if you think about $2890 you are getting 70 more hp so that extra 70 is $41.30 more per hp that is much more expensive to get n/a.

So do you want high 12's or low 12's?


Change the MAC LT's and prochamber to only $700 because thats what they go for at good shops
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 05:24 PM
  #30  
MexGT's Avatar
MexGT
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,206
From: Tampico, Mexico
Default RE: FI vs NA: A cost breakdown.

I have understand that the more air you get into the engine, u need better flow for the exhaust.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:27 PM.