Notices
GT S197 General Discussion This section is for technical discussions pertaining specifically to the V8 variation of the 2005 and newer Ford Mustang.

Stroking engine to 302

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-15-2007, 01:11 PM
  #11  
06Saleen3V
6th Gear Member
 
06Saleen3V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location:
Posts: 6,414
Default RE: Stroking engine to 302

I was PM'd about this last night from an inquisitive mind and this is my response to him regarding stroking the motor. Increasing the stroke increases the swept volume (which is the volumethatthe piston is "sweeping" inside the cylinder)of each cylinder andincreases an engine’s displacement. With more displacement, comes more power. Remember though, when you increase your displacement (your going from a 4.6L to a 5.0L) without increasing the combustion area, your compression ratio will go up. If your compression ratio is too high, you wont be able to run as much boost. Here is BBR's stroked rotating assembly click . Kits like these usually add 40-50rwhp on average.
06Saleen3V is offline  
Old 12-15-2007, 01:22 PM
  #12  
baha
3rd Gear Member
 
baha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location:
Posts: 585
Default RE: Stroking engine to 302

ORIGINAL: Dex

The rwhp gain is going to depend on the compression. if you plan on FI and do a 8:5 compression you'll lose HP. if you go n/a you need to go to an 11:1 compression
+1 but I wish I know how much power or what is the percentage of power gain with increased compression. and this is why Corvette Z06s and Porsches, BMWs have compressions of even more than 11:1
baha is offline  
Old 12-15-2007, 01:33 PM
  #13  
Philostang
3rd Gear Member
 
Philostang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 757
Default RE: Stroking engine to 302

ORIGINAL: acrokat

ORIGINAL: MexGT

how come u can loose hp with more displacement?
It has to do with compression ratios. What he is saying is that an 8.5:1cr will produce less HP than an 11:1cr.

After ihe intake stroke and right before the spark the cylinder will compress the air/fuel mixture. This compression cause a much more forceful reaction and gives us our power.

Obviously, compressing the mixture more will give is a more forceful reaction.
+1

The moral of Dex's point is that you need to know what your induction plans are before you do your build.

The particulars of each build and available fuel are very important, but here's a simplified outline. Though you are likely to lose hp with a stroked and lower compression engine, you'll be able to run more boost (on the same octane fuel) than the same engine built to the original (or moderately higher) compression. Since you'll gain more hp for the additional boost you run than you would from the points of compression, the low compression higher boost engine is going to have greater power making potential than its high compression low (or no) boost counterpart. These are super-wide generalizations, so you really need to have a goal firmly in mind (power, use, longevity, etc.), and talk with your builder about the best way to achieve them.

Best,
-j
Philostang is offline  
Old 12-15-2007, 03:23 PM
  #14  
forensicsteve
4th Gear Member
 
forensicsteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: LA
Posts: 1,201
Default RE: Stroking engine to 302

I bought the MMR 950 (rated at 950 rwhp). It's still in transit from CA. with upgraded fuel rails. Also sent them the heads to be ported and get comp cams. A mate of mine bought my stock block and since he is extremely mechanically inclined, he's going to build it up with a stroker kit. I chose to go with the whole block because I'm useless at car mechanic stuff.

Told MMR what I was doing, what my power goals wereand what other things car had, turbo, tranny, fuel systemetc. and they took it from there.
forensicsteve is offline  
Old 12-15-2007, 05:57 PM
  #15  
ADudeInNewJersey
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
ADudeInNewJersey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location:
Posts: 778
Default RE: Stroking engine to 302

My plans are to sqeeze out every bit of up and torque out of this bad boy motor. And after all that, just have nitrous maybe 2 stages for the track. I want an all motor car. So what should I do? What compression ratio should I go with and what else should be wanted out of the strokes kit? I know that this motor can't produce 500 rwhp but I still want to keep in NA. How much rwhp. Can I get out of this motor after the strokes kit?


-John
ADudeInNewJersey is offline  
Old 12-15-2007, 07:13 PM
  #16  
Mustang3GT07
6th Gear Member
 
Mustang3GT07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 6,169
Default RE: Stroking engine to 302

Stroke it to a 302 and go FI!! Now that would be sweet!
Mustang3GT07 is offline  
Old 12-15-2007, 07:23 PM
  #17  
sleeper2
3rd Gear Member
 
sleeper2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 573
Default RE: Stroking engine to 302

Some people have said it is better to build to 298 than 302. Less problems, knock sensors still work, etc. You'll have to search for this. This is just what I've read, and I'm still trying to read everything I can and sort everything out on this topic.

Sleeper2
sleeper2 is offline  
Old 12-15-2007, 07:50 PM
  #18  
06Saleen3V
6th Gear Member
 
06Saleen3V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location:
Posts: 6,414
Default RE: Stroking engine to 302

ORIGINAL: Mustang3GT07

Stroke it to a 302 and go FI!! Now that would be sweet!
But what good would come out of that? Hold on, let me think.....Oh yea...the 620hp Saleen Extreme
06Saleen3V is offline  
Old 12-15-2007, 08:20 PM
  #19  
Dex
5th Gear Member
 
Dex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location:
Posts: 2,257
Default RE: Stroking engine to 302

I dont think i know of anyone who has done a 11:1 n/a motor on the s197. seems like everyone is going FI

Philo is right on.
with a 8:5 compression you should be good for about 15-20lbs.
8:1 20-25lbs

Something like that.
Dex is offline  
Old 12-15-2007, 09:04 PM
  #20  
Philostang
3rd Gear Member
 
Philostang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 757
Default RE: Stroking engine to 302

ORIGINAL: ADudeInNewJersey

...And after all that, just have nitrous maybe 2 stages for the track. I want an all motor car.


-John
John, two comments: first, if you claim to want "an all motor" car, then you've defeated yourself with plans for nitrous. You'd be on the juice. That's the classic cheater (read: "non-all-motor") route.

Anyway, the other comment is more of a question. What is your drive for avoiding forced induction? Generally speaking, most plans to "squeeze out" as much as you can from the existing motor are likely to result in as much or more money spent on mods with less return in hp and torque than if you went FI. So I was just wondering what the fascination was with the all motor route.

Best,
-j
Philostang is offline  


Quick Reply: Stroking engine to 302



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:32 AM.