Help! Whippled stang running dangerously lean!
I've seen a few dyno sheets on the stock tune making 450+. I'll see if I can find them again.
I emailed whipple tech my dyno sheet just to see what they'd say.
I emailed whipple tech my dyno sheet just to see what they'd say.
ORIGINAL: moosestang
I've seen a few dyno sheets on the stock tune making 450+. I'll see if I can find them again.
I emailed whipple tech my dyno sheet just to see what they'd say.
I've seen a few dyno sheets on the stock tune making 450+. I'll see if I can find them again.
I emailed whipple tech my dyno sheet just to see what they'd say.
Ialso hope these are from forum members here or another forum saying these are on a stock Whipple tune so we have something a little solid so we know they are the stock tune.
If anyone else has links to forum members here or other forumsthat posted dynos (stock Whipple tune) sheetswould be good to look at.
Moose what did you say in your e-mail to Whipple?
hey TJ, if you start a new thread asking
for whipple HO dyno charts, i'm sure we'll
get quite a few
i'll even post my famous mustang dyno chart
once again, for everyones viewing pleasure
for whipple HO dyno charts, i'm sure we'll
get quite a few

i'll even post my famous mustang dyno chart
once again, for everyones viewing pleasure

Here ya go. a standard Whipple tune video on Youtube. Hope it helps. But not sure. I believ they say 487 on a standard tune. My whipple HO tune produced 409 SAE on a Dynojet Dyno.
Could be BS but still a nice dyno run.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=fT3PQoVQ0zI
Could be BS but still a nice dyno run.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=fT3PQoVQ0zI
ORIGINAL: TASSY5
Here ya go. a standard Whipple tune video on Youtube. Hope it helps. But not sure. I believ they say 487 on a standard tune. My whipple HO tune produced 409 SAE on a Dynojet Dyno.
Could be BS but still a nice dyno run.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=fT3PQoVQ0zI
Here ya go. a standard Whipple tune video on Youtube. Hope it helps. But not sure. I believ they say 487 on a standard tune. My whipple HO tune produced 409 SAE on a Dynojet Dyno.
Could be BS but still a nice dyno run.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=fT3PQoVQ0zI

Tassy if you could the next time you talk to your tuner if you could ask him how much total timing your running I am trying to work out some numbers?
If you could post it and or pm me the amount of timing.
TIA
ORIGINAL: hammeron
hey TJ, if you start a new thread asking
for whipple HO dyno charts, i'm sure we'll
get quite a few
i'll even post my famous mustang dyno chart
once again, for everyones viewing pleasure
hey TJ, if you start a new thread asking
for whipple HO dyno charts, i'm sure we'll
get quite a few

i'll even post my famous mustang dyno chart
once again, for everyones viewing pleasure

I forgot about your dyno if I remember correctly it was 410rwhp? but on a MD so if the normal 8-10% that would put you at 442rwhp-450rwhp. But we won't know for sure till you get on a dynojet
but still good chance you should be close to those numbers.You know I thought about that but something like that (dyno thread) but thinking it will get buried pretty quick on the front page, and if I put it here I don't think we would see a lot due to low traffic, what do you think?
You think many people here dyno thier Whipple with the stock tune and will have dynosheets as I would want to see dyno sheets?
ORIGINAL: hammeron
good memory, it was 411rwhp and 417ft-lbs (mustang dyno)
10.8 afr / 10.5psi / 91 oct FRPP tune
definately new thread time....
good memory, it was 411rwhp and 417ft-lbs (mustang dyno)
10.8 afr / 10.5psi / 91 oct FRPP tune
definately new thread time....
Edited:I started a threadon the front page.
ORIGINAL: TJ
Moose what did you say in your e-mail to Whipple?
Moose what did you say in your e-mail to Whipple?
Above is the email I sent.
The car should make atleast 425 or else it's false advertising. that's assuming a 15% drivetrain loss which is more than generous from what i've seen. I'll get it dynoed again with a new clutch and without the drag radials.
[/align]
ORIGINAL: moosestang
I had my car dynoed a few weeks ago and was surprised how low the results were. I was expecting atleast 430rwhp even with it running rich. Is this normal results for the whipple HO kit on a 2006 mustang gt using the standard tune for 91 octane? It was a mobile dyno jet by the way.
Above is the email I sent.
The car should make atleast 425 or else it's false advertising. that's assuming a 15% drivetrain loss which is more than generous from what i've seen. I'll get it dynoed again with a new clutch and without the drag radials.
[/align]
ORIGINAL: TJ
Moose what did you say in your e-mail to Whipple?
Moose what did you say in your e-mail to Whipple?
Above is the email I sent.
The car should make atleast 425 or else it's false advertising. that's assuming a 15% drivetrain loss which is more than generous from what i've seen. I'll get it dynoed again with a new clutch and without the drag radials.
[/align]

I wouldinterested to hear what they say.
Ok check this link (Justins comments) out belowregarding running 4.10 gears when getting a dyno so just (little /thinking maybe around7rwhp on dyno paper) something to keep in mind.
http://www.vmptuning.com/forum/showthread.php?t=628
I also have another link that I found a few weeks agomight/should intrest you let me see if I could find it and I'll post itif I still have it.


