Notices
GT S197 General Discussion This section is for technical discussions pertaining specifically to the V8 variation of the 2005 and newer Ford Mustang.

lost power

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-08-2011, 08:14 AM
  #11  
Bmr4life
5th Gear Member
 
Bmr4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ATL
Posts: 2,955
Default

Originally Posted by modru2004
im surprised no one pointed this out.

he said stock car, but never specified the details. just because a cars stock doesn't mean they all come from the factory with the same options/equipment.

IE: gears. if hes rolling say 3.31 and hes going against a car with say 3.55 or maybe even a newer gt say 2010 with 3.73 that will make a difference in the outcome.
Doesn't matter. I'm pretty sure the OP wasn't racing a 5.0. A 2010 is still a 4.6L so that's no different. Even if the car had 3.73, it was still stock and a tuned auto with 3.31s should beat that with that being the worst case scenario for the OP. If he's a manual, he'd do even better. A CAI with a proper tune makes a huge improvement versus stock.

Last edited by Bmr4life; 08-08-2011 at 08:16 AM.
Bmr4life is offline  
Old 08-08-2011, 12:04 PM
  #12  
AMChrisRose
3rd Gear Member
 
AMChrisRose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: PA
Posts: 802
Default

Yeah, regardless - I'd be willing to bet that this is completely a tune issue. I think that if you were to get a good aftermarket mail-order custom tune, you'd notice a night/day difference in horsepower/torque, throttle response, mileage, driveability, etc.

Give our tuning specialists over at Bama Performance a call if you'd like. They can write you a killer set of custom tunes (Street, Performance and Race) for whatever octane fuels that you're running and your style of driving. Plus, you'll get Free Tunes for Life, in case you every need any updates for future modifications.

Hope this helps! Let me know if you have absolutely any other questions, whatsoever!

Chris
AMChrisRose is offline  
Old 08-08-2011, 02:43 PM
  #13  
Nuke
6th Gear Member
 
Nuke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: PA to KY ('07) to IL ('09) to MS ('10) to FL ('11)
Posts: 16,182
Default

The 20" wheels, unless super-expensive for low weight, probably added about 25-50 lbs of rotational mass. The decrease in drivetrain losses from the UDP's and aluminum DS (neither one ADDS crank HP; they simply reduce loses) are being negated by the new loses from the wheel weight. 20" wheels have always been a sore spot for many; either looking like *** or zapping power or both. I'll take less metal ands more rubber any day.

And then there's your tune issue...!
Nuke is offline  
Old 08-08-2011, 09:06 PM
  #14  
SeVeReDiStOrTiOn
2nd Gear Member
 
SeVeReDiStOrTiOn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 441
Default

Don't think he has an aluminum DS
SeVeReDiStOrTiOn is offline  
Old 08-11-2011, 08:19 AM
  #15  
csmoore88
Thread Starter
 
csmoore88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: ky
Posts: 34
Default

Thanks all! I am truly grateful for this forum and your input. U have saved me headache and money. Now, I bought and installed a sss Adrenaline axle back. I feel a significant increase in torque in low end. The car I mentioned was a 2007 gt . However, I was wrong about mods, as I learned it had a cervini (functional)) ram air hood and frpp stingers. Still, that is not enough to overcome a car equipped and tuned the way mine is. I value your input on the wheels but. I must concede on this issue because I like them enough for a small loss in power. I know that is counter intuitive as it is counter productive. But they look great and I don't have the means for ultra lite right now. I guess I will order my bama tune today, as well as the 4'10 gears from frpp. Enough of my babble, thanks mfers you are the most valuable tool to people like me. Maybe one day I can give advice too. Lol
csmoore88 is offline  
Old 08-11-2011, 10:06 AM
  #16  
Bmr4life
5th Gear Member
 
Bmr4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ATL
Posts: 2,955
Default

Originally Posted by csmoore88
Thanks all! I am truly grateful for this forum and your input. U have saved me headache and money. Now, I bought and installed a sss Adrenaline axle back. I feel a significant increase in torque in low end. The car I mentioned was a 2007 gt . However, I was wrong about mods, as I learned it had a cervini (functional)) ram air hood and frpp stingers. Still, that is not enough to overcome a car equipped and tuned the way mine is. I value your input on the wheels but. I must concede on this issue because I like them enough for a small loss in power. I know that is counter intuitive as it is counter productive. But they look great and I don't have the means for ultra lite right now. I guess I will order my bama tune today, as well as the 4'10 gears from frpp. Enough of my babble, thanks mfers you are the most valuable tool to people like me. Maybe one day I can give advice too. Lol
I hate to have to tell you this but axlebacks do absolutely nothing for power.
Bmr4life is offline  
Old 08-12-2011, 02:41 AM
  #17  
Swoope
 
Swoope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Fl
Posts: 49
Default

Originally Posted by Bmr4life
Sadly, shorties are a waste of money. If FI is truly in your future, LT's is the only way to go.

As others have said, your tune is ***. Get one from Bama, Brenspeed or another vendor mentioned in these forums.

Did you happen to weigh your wheels? I bet your chrome dipped 20s are very heavy and are slowing you down A LOT. I have some "light weight" 20s and they are still fairly heavy at 55lbs. Your stock 17s were only 45-50lbs, your new 20s are easily 65+. I also doubt the udp's made up for the new wheels.
yep,

wheels and tires.

beers
Swoope is offline  
Old 08-15-2011, 10:03 AM
  #18  
csmoore88
Thread Starter
 
csmoore88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: ky
Posts: 34
Default

OK. Bmr, although I appreciate your condescension, I am compelled to disagree. After significant research I have learned that running straight pipes makes the car run too lean, risking valves being burnt. Evidently(and I have NEVER claimed to be mechanically inclined), the inlet/outlet of fuel and air is a complicated symbiotic relationship. It all works together with specific ratios and mixtures. (14.7:1) I believe. Anyhow, when there is no back pressure the fuel is expelled too quickly from the combustion chamber causing less combustion/power. The fuel is not burnt as efficiently AND there is already too much air to fuel. This also presents a problem concerning proper pressure (both positive and negative) for the cam overlap. So, if you insist on patronizing me while I try to learn this magnificent car, please leave me be. The others on this forum are helpful and friendly enuf. Without you. The difference in power is certainly there, I would know, I drive her everyday. Thanks mfers.
csmoore88 is offline  
Old 08-15-2011, 10:07 AM
  #19  
Bmr4life
5th Gear Member
 
Bmr4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ATL
Posts: 2,955
Default

Originally Posted by csmoore88
OK. Bmr, although I appreciate your condescension, I am compelled to disagree. After significant research I have learned that running straight pipes makes the car run too lean, risking valves being burnt. Evidently(and I have NEVER claimed to be mechanically inclined), the inlet/outlet of fuel and air is a complicated symbiotic relationship. It all works together with specific ratios and mixtures. (14.7:1) I believe. Anyhow, when there is no back pressure the fuel is expelled too quickly from the combustion chamber causing less combustion/power. The fuel is not burnt as efficiently AND there is already too much air to fuel. This also presents a problem concerning proper pressure (both positive and negative) for the cam overlap. So, if you insist on patronizing me while I try to learn this magnificent car, please leave me be. The others on this forum are helpful and friendly enuf. Without you. The difference in power is certainly there, I would know, I drive her everyday. Thanks mfers.
The freak are you talking about? All I said was axle backs do nothing for HP. Its well known man. No one's being condescending, lighten up.

I re-read what you posted. I don't think you know what axle backs are. Axle back refers to the muffler portion of our exhaust. The part behind the axle, nothing else.

I'm really trying to understand what I said that cut you so bad. Was its the "your tune is ***" line? That was not directed at you, it was directed to your tune which can easily be corrected. Perhaps I should have said "your tune is not optimal". Sorry either way.

Last edited by Bmr4life; 08-15-2011 at 10:13 AM.
Bmr4life is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jrrhd73must
Classic Mustang General Discussion
2
10-02-2015 09:17 PM
KingRando
2005-2014 Mustangs
5
10-02-2015 08:06 AM
ChampInSD
5.0L GT S550 Tech
13
10-02-2015 04:55 AM
MustangForums Editor
General Tech
0
09-25-2015 06:58 PM



Quick Reply: lost power



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:13 PM.