Notices
GT S197 General Discussion This section is for technical discussions pertaining specifically to the V8 variation of the 2005 and newer Ford Mustang.

no love for the 4.6 3v?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-01-2012, 11:24 AM
  #21  
Thrashard340
2nd Gear Member
 
Thrashard340's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 423
Default

Jim, I understand the relationship between HP and torque. But do not understand how his comment relates to mine regarding the evolution of the automotive market.

On the flip side, what should be noted is that these imports can keep up with the 4.6 despite having a smaller displacement and two fewer cylinders. So having a higher torque figure down low is irrelevant if the end result is the same. This was in part, why we have the Coyote now.

Last edited by Thrashard340; 02-01-2012 at 11:26 AM.
Thrashard340 is offline  
Old 02-01-2012, 11:41 AM
  #22  
onederful100
6th Gear Member
 
onederful100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 6,130
Default

V6 vs V8 370 vs 2010 Mustang
very similar stock for stock
add mods and FI, and this is where the V8 Mustangs pulls away.
boost for boost, the 2010 Mustang will get more power and tq and will outdo the 370
providing it can hook.
also mod for mod the V8 will get more power
onederful100 is offline  
Old 02-01-2012, 12:26 PM
  #23  
Thrashard340
2nd Gear Member
 
Thrashard340's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 423
Default

Originally Posted by onederful100
V6 vs V8 370 vs 2010 Mustang
very similar stock for stock
add mods and FI, and this is where the V8 Mustangs pulls away.
boost for boost, the 2010 Mustang will get more power and tq and will outdo the 370
providing it can hook.
also mod for mod the V8 will get more power
Absolutely. As the 4.6 is larger in displacement with two more cylinders, it will inherently make more power with the right equipment. But it still doesn't mean that Ford didn't think it was obsolete to the point where they replaced it with the Coyote. That's the point I was driving at.

I think you guys are misinterpreting what I am trying to say. No disrespect to the 4.6. I enjoyed mine every minute I owned it. But there's a reason why it was eventually replaced.
Thrashard340 is offline  
Old 02-01-2012, 12:55 PM
  #24  
onederful100
6th Gear Member
 
onederful100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 6,130
Default

Originally Posted by Thrashard340
Absolutely. As the 4.6 is larger in displacement with two more cylinders, it will inherently make more power with the right equipment. But it still doesn't mean that Ford didn't think it was obsolete to the point where they replaced it with the Coyote. That's the point I was driving at.

I think you guys are misinterpreting what I am trying to say. No disrespect to the 4.6. I enjoyed mine every minute I owned it. But there's a reason why it was eventually replaced.

i see your point. in its time the 4.6 was great. but the 5.0 is better.
agreed.
onederful100 is offline  
Old 02-01-2012, 02:24 PM
  #25  
Thrashard340
2nd Gear Member
 
Thrashard340's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 423
Default

In all fairness to the 4.6, I will add that the 4.6 is what rendered the original 5.0 pushrod obsolete. The 4.6 paved the way for OHC philosophy that was carried into the Coyote. Even back in the late 80's, Ford recognized that the future in terms of HP and efficiency for their V8's were in OHC design. Neither GM nor Chrysler has yet to take it to the level Ford has. GM is still using a pushrod V8 in the Camaro/Corvette. Chrysler's Hemi's are also pushrod. GM and Chrysler's engines require large displacement to produce 400+ HP, while the 5.0 DOHC is capable of hitting 400+ HP with far less displacement. The new 5.0 Coyote has absolutely nothing in common with the original 5.0 pushrod from back in the day. And the Coyote can thank the 4.6 for being part of its creation.

The 4.6 will always have its place in Ford's history.
Thrashard340 is offline  
Old 02-01-2012, 08:12 PM
  #26  
MrSandman
5th Gear Member
 
MrSandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: MO
Posts: 3,235
Default

Originally Posted by onederful100
i see your point. in its time the 4.6 was great. but the 5.0 is better.
agreed.
... and the 4.6 sounds a lot better. I really wish we could have that old school sound again.. the 4.6 gets close.. the new 5.0 sounds "unique".. but the old 5.0 is just sex when it comes to sound.
MrSandman is online now  
Old 02-02-2012, 06:29 AM
  #27  
pascal
S197 Section Modder-ator
 
pascal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 13,373
Default

Originally Posted by MrSandman
... but the old 5.0 is just sex when it comes to sound.
That's what push rods do for you........ and the combination of non variable cam timing.

Although the 4.6 4V in the Termi is also pure sex.
pascal is offline  
Old 02-02-2012, 11:27 AM
  #28  
rocket237
2nd Gear Member
 
rocket237's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: connecticut
Posts: 279
Default

Originally Posted by Thrashard340
In all fairness to the 4.6, I will add that the 4.6 is what rendered the original 5.0 pushrod obsolete.

The 4.6 will always have its place in Ford's history.
correction: will always hold a place in my GT !lol.
Originally Posted by MrSandman
... and the 4.6 sounds a lot better. I really wish we could have that old school sound again.. the 4.6 gets close.. the new 5.0 sounds "unique".. but the old 5.0 is just sex when it comes to sound.
That ol' school sound I have in my Ram, Course I had too rip out the resonators and muffler, and replace with a series 50 flowmaster, and e-cut out! .
rocket237 is offline  
Old 02-02-2012, 11:49 AM
  #29  
Thrashard340
2nd Gear Member
 
Thrashard340's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 423
Default

Ahhhh 2V vs 3V...

How many times have we seen a thread where 3V 4.6 didn't sound as good as a 2V 4.6?
Thrashard340 is offline  
Old 02-02-2012, 12:26 PM
  #30  
HxCGuitars
3rd Gear Member
 
HxCGuitars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: IL
Posts: 718
Default

Originally Posted by Thrashard340
Ahhhh 2V vs 3V...

How many times have we seen a thread where 3V 4.6 didn't sound as good as a 2V 4.6?
I'd have to say that the 2V's definitely have a unique sound when compared to the 3V's. As far as the sound of the new 5.0, it's definitely more of an exotic sound. Took me a bit to like it, but after hearing the cam idle tunes it grew more and more on me. Still think I like the 4.6 sound a bit better, but I'm not knocking the 5.0 at all.

I love my 4.6
HxCGuitars is offline  


Quick Reply: no love for the 4.6 3v?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:59 AM.