MustangForums.com

MustangForums.com (https://mustangforums.com/forum/index.php)
-   Mach 1 Section (https://mustangforums.com/forum/mach-1-section-86/)
-   -   camero smoke mach 1 (https://mustangforums.com/forum/mach-1-section/577687-camero-smoke-mach-1-a.html)

mach1owner 12-16-2009 03:19 PM

camero smoke mach 1
 
I would like to know how a v6 camero has 304 hp as apposed to v8 mach 1 4valves on each cylinder that makes 305hp WTF where is the power

mach1owner 12-16-2009 05:44 PM

The mach 1 making 305 the mach is an 03 nd the camero is 2010 how is that possible that the v6 is puttin up bigger numbers sorry the same numbers

hot sauce 12-16-2009 06:20 PM


Originally Posted by mach1owner (Post 6696383)
The mach 1 making 305 the mach is an 03 nd the camero is 2010 how is that possible that the v6 is puttin up bigger numbers sorry the same numbers

because these engines are getting better by the year the tq is still down on the v6 due to its size if you line the mach vs 2010 v6 camaro the mach will rape the camaro

mrtstang 12-16-2009 06:26 PM

Yeah, even though the fwhp hp is the same, the Mach will still rape it.

darkmach1 12-16-2009 06:46 PM

How good is high horsepower when you add tons of weight?? Whats the modding potential on these v6 camaros? Im sure those motors are just about maxed out.

I've ran the new L99 auto SS with boltons/tune and I'm not impressed by its performance.

mrtstang 12-16-2009 07:05 PM

^^^How did you do against the L99?

mikedeuce6 12-16-2009 07:14 PM

Mach1owner go here --->https://mustangforums.com/forum/must...-official.html

rygi23 12-16-2009 07:43 PM

According to both chassis dynos and performance calculators, bone stock Machs make about 325/345, yes they were underrated. Camaro V6 deserves kudos for the peak hp, but the tq is only 273. Fastest legitimate 1/4 mi. for a stock Mach I've seen with my own eyes is a 13.06 (though one publication I read claimed a 12.99 with a professional driver), while the fastest documented pass I can find for the Camaro V6 is 14.20. GM certainly has a potent product but I wouldn't say it compares with ours...not that it's supposed to. The extra 7 years of development certainly helps also.

ztalon 12-16-2009 08:42 PM

The Camaro V6 is a very nice engine and I even saw one car magazine that liked the V6 Camaro over the SS. They thought it was more nimble and easier to toss around.


Originally Posted by rygi23 (Post 6696638)
According to both chassis dynos and performance calculators, bone stock Machs make about 325/345, yes they were underrated. Camaro V6 deserves kudos for the peak hp, but the tq is only 273. Fastest legitimate 1/4 mi. for a stock Mach I've seen with my own eyes is a 13.06 (though one publication I read claimed a 12.99 with a professional driver), while the fastest documented pass I can find for the Camaro V6 is 14.20. GM certainly has a potent product but I wouldn't say it compares with ours...not that it's supposed to. The extra 7 years of development certainly helps also.

Great explanation.

mikedeuce6 12-16-2009 10:05 PM


Originally Posted by rygi23 (Post 6696638)
According to both chassis dynos and performance calculators, bone stock Machs make about 325/345, yes they were underrated.

Is that true?! Please say its so!


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:46 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands