maxshuty

I dont know if this is old or not but I thought this is amazing:
http://www.mustang50magazine.com/fea...ild/index.html

dafizuck

Quite old... but I dont get sick of it so Im not complainin.. hah.

yellowjacketfever

i am curious. how did it run and what were the dyno results. anyone no...

acascianelli

That engine produces 510hp and 420lbft in a V12 Vantage. I can't imagine it's much more than that.

maxshuty

Thats it?! I would think it would have had a lot more than a GT500 heh...

acascianelli

It's NA and it's only 0.6L bigger than the 5.4.

maxshuty

But the Mustang GT is only .6 bigger than the v6 and it gets 100 more horsepower. All those extra cylinders for nothing but using more gas...

acascianelli

They are different types of engines. The 6.0L in the Aston is intended for a grand tourer, and the 5.4L is for a Muscle car. Comparing the number of cylinders and horsepower difference between two motors is not a very good judgment of the motor. It like calling the 1000hp 8L Bugatti V16 crap because you get the same power with half the cylinders and less displacement with a twin turbo LSx.

cegha

Thanks for the link. I had seen someone posting some images of that before, at a display, showing the car. That is one badass stang. Wonder what would happen if you turbo'd/SC'd it?

acascianelli

A twin supercharged setup would be crazy for that thing.