Red07Z06

Ranger is one hell of a driver. Give him a few runs in the Gt and I bet it wil be running faster than any times we have read in magazines. the only problem with the GT, is that is so damn heavy. Why would Ford not make this car 3200 lbs?

White2000GT

You missed my point Red. It doesn't say the car is stock. It says the engine, tranny, and S/C are stock. In other words, they are the exact same engine, tranny, and S/C as came on the car from the factory. Yes, it obviously had mods. It sure as hell wouldn't have run in the 9's otherwise. You will never see a 100% stock anything with Evolution Performance written on it.
My car is lightly modded, but the engine is still 100% stock because I haven't done a thing in the world to it. I still have the stock block, pistons, crank, heads, valves, cams... everything. Hell, I even still have the stock throttle body and plenum. That is what they mean when they say stock engine, tranny and S/C. Sure they did a pulley swap, but it is still the stock S/C from the factory. Had they swapped it for a KB or a Whipple then they couldn't say stock S/C anymore because the S/C obviously wouldn't be the one that came on it stock from the factory.

1fastcobra

hell ya 30 seconds to mars background music, car is sweetass!!!

steele901

and $30,000 more on the price tag. find somewhere else to play TROLL

Red07Z06

I'm not trolling, just pointing out facts. Oh and try to get a GT500 for sticker price. Dealers are marking them up as much as $20,000. I like mustangs, I have had several of them. But when someone says something is stock, it should be.

White2000GT

So in NASCAR all the "stock cars" should be stock? How boring would that race be if there were a bunch of stock Monte Carlos and Taurus' running around the track at a blazing 120 MPH? Or in Pro Stock drag racing if there were a bunch of stock cars running 16 second 1/4 mile passes?
I think your definitions of stock might be different than what was meant by "stock" in the video.

red50stang

Hey a nice car is a nice car. If you want to complain about it feel free to go to a corvette site and complain that the mustang guys are cheating, because I think we all agree stock or not the car is nice.

smitdog5.3

what in the world are you talking about, its not our fault ford could not get the #'s that gm and dodge can out of a naturally aspirated engine, so they had to throw a supercharger on there, and don't talk about gas mileage, when the new ls7 427 still 25 to 28 mpg if not more.

White2000GT

Well smitdog, I'm not sure if you were talking to me or red50stang, but I will respond by saying that I am sure Ford could just as easily get those numbers out of an N/A car if they would produce a 7.0L engine. But for whatever reason, Ford prefers to use smaller displacement S/C'd engines to get the big numbers.

steele901

sticker for sticker dude. you know you couldn't get a C6 zo6 for sticker the first 6 months they were out either.

And by the way, when evolution performance tell's you all the mods on the car, and at the begining they simple state that the motor, trans and blower are factory. not that the car is untouched. they want people to know everything done to the car. they're developing shelby performance packages.