To all those people who say TURBO's are RICE!
05-28-2005, 02:25 AM
#21
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location:
Posts: 920
RE: To all those people who say TURBO's are RICE!
on the turbo on small engine cars. I'm into Nitro RC cars (not so much right now), and they make a turbo and supercharger application for 2.5cc engine. Thats .0025L BTW. They are cool in my book 
05-28-2005, 04:19 AM
#23
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 613
RE: To all those people who say TURBO's are RICE!
ORIGINAL: I G Joe
thats what my ****in point was ITS NOT HARD TO BUILD A TURBO HONDA. theirs a reason why people goto stand alone systems its called reliability. good for you and your CRX but im sorry i stick with my 2.0L comment and up. its a BIG waste of time trying to get power outta anything below that. reason being your all Top end and no bottom. plus i could spend less money on a Chevy 350 than you do on your Honda B16A or B18's and still kick your ***. if ya wanna talk about corners fine ill whip out my Turbo 2.3L mustang and kick your ***. go ahead call me ignorant or w/e but just remember you'll never win =P
oh also for your CRX you wasted alot of time and money on it. your 720cc injectors = waste, your T3/T4 turbo = waste come on its only running 8psi.... no tuning alright you just wasted alot of money GOOD FOR YOU.
thats what my ****in point was ITS NOT HARD TO BUILD A TURBO HONDA. theirs a reason why people goto stand alone systems its called reliability. good for you and your CRX but im sorry i stick with my 2.0L comment and up. its a BIG waste of time trying to get power outta anything below that. reason being your all Top end and no bottom. plus i could spend less money on a Chevy 350 than you do on your Honda B16A or B18's and still kick your ***. if ya wanna talk about corners fine ill whip out my Turbo 2.3L mustang and kick your ***. go ahead call me ignorant or w/e but just remember you'll never win =P
oh also for your CRX you wasted alot of time and money on it. your 720cc injectors = waste, your T3/T4 turbo = waste come on its only running 8psi.... no tuning alright you just wasted alot of money GOOD FOR YOU.
whip out your 2.3L mustang and kick my ***...hmmm...easy to type that isn't it?
05-28-2005, 10:36 AM
#24
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Assachusetts
Posts: 1,899
RE: To all those people who say TURBO's are RICE!
ORIGINAL: FiveOhNo
ORIGINAL: I G Joe
thats what my ****in point was ITS NOT HARD TO BUILD A TURBO HONDA. theirs a reason why people goto stand alone systems its called reliability. good for you and your CRX but im sorry i stick with my 2.0L comment and up. its a BIG waste of time trying to get power outta anything below that. reason being your all Top end and no bottom. plus i could spend less money on a Chevy 350 than you do on your Honda B16A or B18's and still kick your ***. if ya wanna talk about corners fine ill whip out my Turbo 2.3L mustang and kick your ***. go ahead call me ignorant or w/e but just remember you'll never win =P
oh also for your CRX you wasted alot of time and money on it. your 720cc injectors = waste, your T3/T4 turbo = waste come on its only running 8psi.... no tuning alright you just wasted alot of money GOOD FOR YOU.
oh...lemme guess...you say a turbo on anything below 2.0 b/c you have a 2.3 right? right, that makes a whole lot of sense. i wasted all of 1400 bucks on the turbo setup i have...man, i sure wish i hadn't done that. you have no logical reason that a turbo shouldn't be put on anything less than a 2.0 (maybe b/c it's a nice even number?) what's so bad about being all top end in a high revving application? i don't need power below 2k b/c i'm never there. only 8psi? wow, yeah...8psi does nothing, you're right...
I agree i dont think ive evr seen a fast 2.3 liter mustang at the track.....In my eyes those things are a POS no offense G I Joe
ORIGINAL: I G Joe
thats what my ****in point was ITS NOT HARD TO BUILD A TURBO HONDA. theirs a reason why people goto stand alone systems its called reliability. good for you and your CRX but im sorry i stick with my 2.0L comment and up. its a BIG waste of time trying to get power outta anything below that. reason being your all Top end and no bottom. plus i could spend less money on a Chevy 350 than you do on your Honda B16A or B18's and still kick your ***. if ya wanna talk about corners fine ill whip out my Turbo 2.3L mustang and kick your ***. go ahead call me ignorant or w/e but just remember you'll never win =P
oh also for your CRX you wasted alot of time and money on it. your 720cc injectors = waste, your T3/T4 turbo = waste come on its only running 8psi.... no tuning alright you just wasted alot of money GOOD FOR YOU.
oh...lemme guess...you say a turbo on anything below 2.0 b/c you have a 2.3 right? right, that makes a whole lot of sense. i wasted all of 1400 bucks on the turbo setup i have...man, i sure wish i hadn't done that. you have no logical reason that a turbo shouldn't be put on anything less than a 2.0 (maybe b/c it's a nice even number?) what's so bad about being all top end in a high revving application? i don't need power below 2k b/c i'm never there. only 8psi? wow, yeah...8psi does nothing, you're right...
whip out your 2.3L mustang and kick my ***...hmmm...easy to type that isn't it?
I agree i dont think ive evr seen a fast 2.3 liter mustang at the track.....In my eyes those things are a POS no offense G I Joe
05-28-2005, 01:12 PM
#25
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,836
RE: To all those people who say TURBO's are RICE!
ORIGINAL: 2000Si
:withtheguywiththebadassfox:
ORIGINAL: Obsol3te
What he said.
ORIGINAL: FiveOhNo
and who said turbo's were rice?
and who said turbo's were rice?
Mwar har harGo check out my latest addition in the 5.0 section
05-29-2005, 10:50 PM
#28
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 2,034
RE: To all those people who say TURBO's are RICE!
Saleen 351.... Your deffinitly naive. You should just say "no one should turbo charge a four cylinder" but you cant say that because that would make you a hypocrite. An internal combustion engine, basicly works the same no matter what size the displacement. A form of turbo charging just increases the power output. Sure you can take a 350 and turbo charge that, but you can also take a small four cylinder which weights probably 1/3 the weight and make over 400hp and up. Then you can put that motor in a lotus, or s2000. keeping the weight down and the weight ratio close to 50/50. Instead of having a nose heaving chevy. Sometimes bigger isnt better. theres a reason champ cars use. turbocharged 2.6 liter v-8 motors instead of a turbocharged 5.8 liter v-8.