New Member Area Are you new to Mustang Forums? WELCOME! Check in, tell us about yourself and your ride.

5.0 mustang

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-15-2005, 12:33 AM
  #1  
lrall
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
lrall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NE
Posts: 247
Default 5.0 mustang

im looking into mustangs and i want to get a 5.0 liter 'stang. what years was this engine offered? I am looking into getting alot of power out of it and i want to start with something good. Would a 5.0 liter be my best bet or should i got with a different engine? thanx in advance, and if it is in a forum please direct me
lrall is offline  
Old 03-15-2005, 12:56 AM
  #2  
dc_mann8
5th Gear Member
 
dc_mann8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PEI, Canada
Posts: 2,985
Default RE: 5.0 mustang

pretty much any year up to 95, if you are a performance guy on a budget i suggest a 89-92 mustang 5.0, good luck.. any specific questions about these cars or anything ill try to help
dc_mann8 is offline  
Old 03-15-2005, 11:28 AM
  #3  
1fast05GT
3rd Gear Member
 
1fast05GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location:
Posts: 769
Default RE: 5.0 mustang

Welcome!!! I'll stay away from the 86-88 models. The stock '86-'88 HO engine from a Mustang has a speed-density computer setup. It's good for inferring relative air intake, but it's inflexible as far as adding high performance components, such as a healthier camshaft. The best you can do with speed density is a bigger throttle body and a K&N air filter, maybe the rear axle gear, and that's it. Mass air was used on 5.0 Mustangs from 1989-1995 , and it has a more accurate way to measure airflow (meaning better response and performance). In addition, the mass air computer is a "learning" computer, which means you can add a new component, and within a minute of starting up the car, the computer will automatically recalibrate itself around that item. As far as horsepower and mass air: the wallet's the limit!
1fast05GT is offline  
Old 03-15-2005, 06:15 PM
  #4  
blueangelfightr
5th Gear Member
 
blueangelfightr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 3,645
Default RE: 5.0 mustang

I would go for a 94 or 95. Thats the last years of the 5.0. That will probally be the best. They are pretty cheap too.
blueangelfightr is offline  
Old 03-16-2005, 10:50 AM
  #5  
DIVER8374
4th Gear Member
 
DIVER8374's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Posts: 1,519
Default RE: 5.0 mustang

Welcome to the forums!!! I had a 89' lx with 5.0 and 5 speed, it was a great car put lots of miles on it and had no major problems. Good luck with your search!!!
DIVER8374 is offline  
Old 03-16-2005, 06:14 PM
  #6  
jerome
 
jerome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 6
Default RE: 5.0 mustang


[/quote]
I'm sorry to bother you! but do you know alot about 5.0 engines?
jerome is offline  
Old 03-16-2005, 11:42 PM
  #7  
dc_mann8
5th Gear Member
 
dc_mann8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PEI, Canada
Posts: 2,985
Default RE: 5.0 mustang

i wouldnt go 94-95.. its the last year, also the slowest year? and they r cheap but 89-92's are even cheaper
dc_mann8 is offline  
Old 03-17-2005, 11:13 AM
  #8  
Higgie
3rd Gear Member
 
Higgie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Indy
Posts: 824
Default RE: 5.0 mustang

Welcome to the forums. Best of luck with your search !!
Higgie is offline  
Old 03-19-2005, 06:01 PM
  #9  
Freefaller
 
Freefaller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2
Default RE: 5.0 mustang

I disagree about the '94-'95, I have a '94 conv't that outran a camaro with a 350.
Freefaller is offline  
Old 03-19-2005, 06:16 PM
  #10  
dc_mann8
5th Gear Member
 
dc_mann8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PEI, Canada
Posts: 2,985
Default RE: 5.0 mustang

94 conv. is the slowest year mustang is it not? and a camaro with a 350 doesnt say much, if its a ls1 then thats a different story. but then you'd be bs
dc_mann8 is offline  


Quick Reply: 5.0 mustang



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:56 PM.