Pipes, Boost & Juice Talk about Exhaust, Nitrous, Blowers, Turbos, Superchargers... whatever makes you go faster!

eaton VS. KB

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 16, 2006 | 05:00 PM
  #11  
Birdieman4's Avatar
Birdieman4
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,020
From:
Default RE: eaton VS. KB

Probably cheaper, but you'll still have the roots powerband. The KB is a great swap if you can afford it.
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 09:42 PM
  #12  
metaldrummer's Avatar
metaldrummer
Thread Starter
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 715
From:
Default RE: eaton VS. KB

looks like im going KB then. or what about a T76?....
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 10:17 PM
  #13  
mysticsvtcobra96's Avatar
mysticsvtcobra96
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 492
From:
Default RE: eaton VS. KB

Sorry about that Birdieman4..i thought you were talking about the m112 on the 03 04 cobras....and the t76 single turbo is always a good idea..it will make more power and put less strain on your engine when your just crusing around
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 06:29 PM
  #14  
metaldrummer's Avatar
metaldrummer
Thread Starter
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 715
From:
Default RE: eaton VS. KB

however, my car wouldnt spool the turbo very quickly the mods listed in my sig. i mean, without the supercharger, ill have almost no low end torque which means ill be 100X slower off the line -how can i solve that problems if i go with the turbo?
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 06:54 PM
  #15  
Fallstar01's Avatar
Fallstar01
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,654
From: Philadelphia, PA
Default RE: eaton VS. KB

If you get the KB, you can probably save a little money since you already have a front heat-exchanger, pump, resovoir and lines. Also, you should be able to get some money back if you sell the Series II along with the 30 ft/lb injectors.

Old Jan 27, 2006 | 07:12 PM
  #16  
nanaki's Avatar
nanaki
Retired MF Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,891
Default RE: eaton VS. KB

ORIGINAL: metaldrummer

however, my car wouldnt spool the turbo very quickly the mods listed in my sig. i mean, without the supercharger, ill have almost no low end torque which means ill be 100X slower off the line -how can i solve that problems if i go with the turbo?
how do ya figure? you're "spooled" by 3000rpm, maybe less with a turbo. how long does it take you to get up to 3000? even when my GT was stock, it only took a second.

also, if you went with a KB instead of a turbo, you'd have all that power down low and spin more-so off the line than if you had a turbo. just somethin to think about.
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 07:27 PM
  #17  
Fallstar01's Avatar
Fallstar01
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,654
From: Philadelphia, PA
Default RE: eaton VS. KB


ORIGINAL: metaldrummer

however, my car wouldnt spool the turbo very quickly the mods listed in my sig. i mean, without the supercharger, ill have almost no low end torque which means ill be 100X slower off the line -how can i solve that problems if i go with the turbo?

Launch at 3500 RPMs with Slicks and the Turbo will have no problems off the line

Low end power isn't as important for drag racing. It's more useful for Autocross or even track racing where it really shines. It's also much more fun/noticeable for highway and around town driving.
Old Jan 28, 2006 | 12:50 AM
  #18  
Closkey's Avatar
Closkey
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 189
From:
Default RE: eaton VS. KB


ORIGINAL: codyss
The Eaton units were choosen for OE reliability and function. The KB was desinged for raising hell.
hah I like that.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Diode Dynamics
Vendor For Sale / Group Buy Classifieds
28
May 26, 2022 12:02 PM
JT76
Street/Strip
6
Sep 20, 2015 11:32 AM
yurizx6r
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
49
Sep 7, 2015 06:40 PM
killer03cobra
General Tech
10
Oct 6, 2004 11:44 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:24 PM.