Notices
S197 Handling Section For everything suspension related, inlcuding brakes, tires, and wheels.

OEM Ride Quality

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-26-2009, 02:18 PM
  #11  
Sleeper_08
4th Gear Member
 
Sleeper_08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,692
Default

So maybe the OP should buy a set of 2010 rear shocks?
Sleeper_08 is offline  
Old 01-26-2009, 06:36 PM
  #12  
Sam Strano
Former Sponsor
 
Sam Strano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,936
Default

Well, it remains to be seen to what extent they are "better". I'm sure they will be, but at what cost? Literally, OEM parts aren't dirt cheap from the dealer, and considering the cam kit for camber adjustment for us autoxers is $100+ for a few bolts, I wonder what the shocks will cost.

And they are still OEM shocks. Built to a price, and not intended to last much past when Ford is off the hook for warranty.
Sam Strano is offline  
Old 01-26-2009, 10:24 PM
  #13  
So_Cali
5th Gear Member
 
So_Cali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sunny California!!!
Posts: 2,214
Default

Doesn't Roush offer a rear only Shock?
So_Cali is offline  
Old 01-26-2009, 10:38 PM
  #14  
Doogie65
4th Gear Member
 
Doogie65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: WI
Posts: 1,898
Default

Originally Posted by So_Cali
Doesn't Roush offer a rear only Shock?
Yes as their shocks, struts, and springs are sold by the axle.
Doogie65 is offline  
Old 01-27-2009, 12:34 PM
  #15  
DMarkRmeAv8tor
Thread Starter
 
DMarkRmeAv8tor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 12
Default

Originally Posted by Norm Peterson
..... I wouldn't suggest Sensatraks for anybody...... Norm
Norm,

Thanks, great comments.

I was just using the Sensatraks & BBodies as an example of how folks spent thousands of dollars on trying to make their 3.5 ton 94-96 Impala SS into a Corvette only to return them back to a highway cruiser with cheap shocks. Maybe my problem is that I'm trying to turn this GT into a interstate high speed runner that ready isn't a characteristic of the design.

Bilsteins are always my default answer for FBodies. I'm surprised that the S197 Bilsteins cost so much more than those that I can get for FBodies - - - or Corvettes for that matter.

I'm looking for front and rear balance, so I would be doing both. Never used Tokico before, but the cost-point has my interest.
DMarkRmeAv8tor is offline  
Old 01-27-2009, 02:06 PM
  #16  
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Norm Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: state of confusion
Posts: 7,635
Default

You're perhaps thinking about 4th gen F-bodies? What happens is struts are a good bit more expensive than shocks for either a stick axle or (more particularly) a SLA front suspension.

I don't have any experience with the D-specs, but from most everything I've seen here the ride-handling balance has to be better than Tokico's Illumina line (which I do have on other cars). FWIW.


Norm
Norm Peterson is offline  
Old 01-27-2009, 11:27 PM
  #17  
DMarkRmeAv8tor
Thread Starter
 
DMarkRmeAv8tor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 12
Default

Originally Posted by Norm Peterson
You're perhaps thinking about 4th gen F-bodies? Norm
Norm,

Yup, I'm talking about 4Gen FBodies. You can buy front & rear Bilsteins all day for around $350. The best I have seen Bilsteins for the S197 is just over $600.

Too Bad, I'm a big fan of Bilsteins.

Thanks Again,
DMarkRmeAv8tor is offline  
Old 01-28-2009, 12:50 PM
  #18  
Sam Strano
Former Sponsor
 
Sam Strano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,936
Default

The front struts are a lot larger on the Mustang than on the F-body, hence the higher cost.

signed,
Familiar with both S197's and F-bodies in PA
Sam Strano is offline  
Old 01-28-2009, 01:58 PM
  #19  
stang5151
2nd Gear Member
 
stang5151's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Valrico, FL
Posts: 207
Default

Qualifying statement: I'm no suspension expert.

That said - I put the Tokico HPs on mine - it helped the back (pitch), now my front needs more help. LOL.

Good thread though - I'll continue to follow.....
stang5151 is offline  
Old 01-28-2009, 04:02 PM
  #20  
Joe06
 
Joe06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 16
Default

The rear springs are too soft and the rear swaybar is too thin. The car was designed like this so amateurs would not have an issue with too much oversteer when taking a corner on the fuel or in rainy conditions. With this configuration the car wants to push around the corners instead of the rear end sliding out. I agree on a stock GT the rear end is not doing what the front is. Roush sells rear only springs that are a little stiffer and will drop the car 3/4" in the rear. This will level the car out. Steeda has a rear sway bar only that is alot thicker. I think the swaybar only will significantly tighten up the rear end without sacrificing ride quality on your daily driver. The combination of all of the above will plus shocks will tighten the rear up significantly and the thing will corner like it never has before.
Joe06 is offline  


Quick Reply: OEM Ride Quality



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:31 PM.