Notices
S197 Shelby Section This section is for technical discussions pertaining specifically to the latest installment of the Shelby Mustangs; the Shelby GT, the CS6, and the awesome GT500.

WHY DO GT500's come with 3.31

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-09-2012, 08:54 PM
  #11  
GT500Steve
4th Gear Member
 
GT500Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,087
Default

3.73s are the way to go. While you are at it get some LCAs and an adjustable UCA to cure wheel hop issues. If your car is lowered, get the relo brackets for the lowers. Bye bye to wheel hop, and the car will be much easier to drive with the 3.73s.
GT500Steve is offline  
Old 07-10-2012, 06:21 AM
  #12  
2cokeman
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
2cokeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ontario,Canada
Posts: 3,471
Default

Originally Posted by GT500Steve
3.73s are the way to go. While you are at it get some LCAs and an adjustable UCA to cure wheel hop issues. If your car is lowered, get the relo brackets for the lowers. Bye bye to wheel hop, and the car will be much easier to drive with the 3.73s.
I have a stock suspension, will just LCA's do the trick for the wheel hop?
2cokeman is offline  
Old 07-10-2012, 10:19 AM
  #13  
GT500Steve
4th Gear Member
 
GT500Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,087
Default

Originally Posted by 2cokeman
I have a stock suspension, will just LCA's do the trick for the wheel hop?
LCAs will definitley help, and might cure all of it. If you lower the car, the relo brackets are needed to keep suspension geometry correct, and if lowered you will need the adj UCA to correct the driveshaft angle (pinion angle). If you haven't lowered the car, or dont plan to, then the LCAs might fix your wheel hop issues with no other modifications.
GT500Steve is offline  
Old 07-10-2012, 11:06 AM
  #14  
2cokeman
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
2cokeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ontario,Canada
Posts: 3,471
Default

I keep hearing from people that the upper link is whats needed more than the LCA's but I don't know if that is true or not??
2cokeman is offline  
Old 07-10-2012, 01:17 PM
  #15  
jdmcbride
4th Gear Member
 
jdmcbride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Palm Beach to South Carolina
Posts: 1,567
Default

Why? Because with that much power and torque, Ford didn't need to throw lower gears on to make it faster (especially with standard launch control). That is how they can achieve a 3.5 second 0-60 as first gear reaches 60 at redline.
jdmcbride is offline  
Old 07-10-2012, 02:56 PM
  #16  
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Norm Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: state of confusion
Posts: 7,635
Default

Originally Posted by 2cokeman
I keep hearing from people that the upper link is whats needed more than the LCA's but I don't know if that is true or not??
Depends on what you're trying to fix.

Wheel hop is mostly a (soft OE) bushing problem, so the path of least resistance here is to do the two lowers (they're much easier to get at and may solve the problem all by themselves). Followed by the UCA if the LCAs by themselves wasn't enough.

Anti-squat/initial launch bite is a different problem and is related to the rear suspension geometry. Here, you can go with either LCA relo brackets or a UCA that offers a choice of chassis-side mounting holes. The lower hole(s) will improve the anti-squat over the OE geometry. Note that you could do the aftermarket UCA bracket simultaneously with the UCA (and might as well do it once if you're fairly serious about drag racing - but stick to a single supplier of UCA and bracket if you do).


Norm

Last edited by Norm Peterson; 07-10-2012 at 03:01 PM.
Norm Peterson is offline  
Old 07-10-2012, 03:11 PM
  #17  
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Norm Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: state of confusion
Posts: 7,635
Default

Originally Posted by jdmcbride
That is how they can achieve a 3.5 second 0-60 as first gear reaches 60 at redline.
I'm betting on this being the reason - most magazines test 0-60 mph as well as the quarter mile, but don't report the 60-foot time.

Unless somebody here is the re-incarnation of Ronnie Sox, we aren't likely to ever hear of somebody getting their verified 0-60 mph time down into the mid-threes with a front-heavy RWD car on stock tires - if a shift is involved.


Norm
Norm Peterson is offline  
Old 07-10-2012, 03:22 PM
  #18  
jdmcbride
4th Gear Member
 
jdmcbride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Palm Beach to South Carolina
Posts: 1,567
Default

Also, when you are producing more than 500 ft lbs of torque at 1600 RPMs (600 ft lbs at 2500!), you don't need lower gears to get into the powerband! 4.10s would likely only slow you down...
jdmcbride is offline  
Old 07-11-2012, 08:44 PM
  #19  
Dwan
 
Dwan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Alaska
Posts: 4
Default

Adjustable UCA did the trick for me on the wheel hop issue then I added LCA's. then Stedda springs and adjustable pan hard bar for a great lowered look and ride along with Adjustable struts, then came Front lower control arms. next was the 373 gears which stole 2 to 3 miles per gal on the highway. But made the car a lot more fun to drive in the city. Adding a little over 100 HP didn't hurt ether.
The list can go on and on. Everything you do to this car seems to add to the fun and smiles.
Dwan is offline  
Old 07-12-2012, 10:19 AM
  #20  
Lifter583
4th Gear Member
 
Lifter583's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: North Idaho
Posts: 1,440
Default

Originally Posted by 2cokeman
I have a stock suspension, will just LCA's do the trick for the wheel hop?
I changed to the Steeda LCA's on my 08 GT500 and the wheel hop stopped...all else under the car is stock except for a dyno-tech 1 piece DS

Last edited by Lifter583; 07-12-2012 at 10:23 AM.
Lifter583 is offline  


Quick Reply: WHY DO GT500's come with 3.31



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:23 PM.