Street/Strip Raced a guy from a light? Had that ride of yours on the timed track? Tell your story here.

LS1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 30, 2006 | 04:07 AM
  #111  
stanger88's Avatar
stanger88
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,541
From:
Default RE: LS1


ORIGINAL: slims00ls1z28

Auto vettes I've seen sucked, no better times than an Fbody. My first "kill" was a c5 (don't know exactly what year he wouldnt stop), White auto. Ran him 3x times 2 from a roll one at like 20 mph one at 40 mph and the other from a stop. I won all 3. Let out at like 110 which is a little more than I trap so roughly a 1/4. He was well behind like 2 or 3 cars everytime and wasnt gaining so he let out. The last run I shifted manually and hit the limiter going into second and he caught up to like my bumper then I pulled him again. All I had was K&N filter and muffler cut off going over the axle. Don't know what he had other than some Z06 rims on it (knew it wasnt a Z06 though) but obviously not enough. Vettes dont weigh that much less as they are listed as 3246 curb. I weighed mine at the dump scales with me in it (205 lb) both kids (maybe 100 between them) and 1/2 tank of gas and the scale said 3606. C5's are heavier than youd think.

Vette's are like mildly lightened F-bods with IRS as far as performance goes pretty much.
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 02:56 AM
  #112  
2004M6GTO's Avatar
2004M6GTO
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 44
From:
Default RE: LS1

I believe GM has always done the numbers game...they did it back in the day also. The C4 Corvette was rated at 250HP, while the basically same IROC-Z was rated at 245HP. Then the Camaro a couple years before that was rated at 190HP, and the Monte Carlo SS with the same basic engine was rated at 180HP... They just don't wanna **** off Camaro/Corvette loyalists. But if I bought an SS Camaro over a Z28 Camaro, it would be to actually have a "SS".
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 03:03 AM
  #113  
MrRogers's Avatar
MrRogers
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,427
From: CA
Default RE: LS1

ORIGINAL: stanger88


ORIGINAL: slims00ls1z28

Auto vettes I've seen sucked, no better times than an Fbody. My first "kill" was a c5 (don't know exactly what year he wouldnt stop), White auto. Ran him 3x times 2 from a roll one at like 20 mph one at 40 mph and the other from a stop. I won all 3. Let out at like 110 which is a little more than I trap so roughly a 1/4. He was well behind like 2 or 3 cars everytime and wasnt gaining so he let out. The last run I shifted manually and hit the limiter going into second and he caught up to like my bumper then I pulled him again. All I had was K&N filter and muffler cut off going over the axle. Don't know what he had other than some Z06 rims on it (knew it wasnt a Z06 though) but obviously not enough. Vettes dont weigh that much less as they are listed as 3246 curb. I weighed mine at the dump scales with me in it (205 lb) both kids (maybe 100 between them) and 1/2 tank of gas and the scale said 3606. C5's are heavier than youd think.

Vette's are like mildly lightened F-bods with IRS as far as performance goes pretty much.
The automatic C5 Vettes are slow because of their 2.73:1 gear ratios.
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 10:05 PM
  #114  
TommyV8's Avatar
TommyV8
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,438
From: St. Louis
Default RE: LS1

My g/f's first Camaro ran 13.36 @ 105 bone stock with 2.73 gears, so would a Vette that weighs 200 lbs or so less be capable of 13.1?
BTW, her 60 ft was .09 better than mine which explains most of the .16 difference.
Old Mar 27, 2007 | 05:06 PM
  #115  
05MidBlueGT's Avatar
05MidBlueGT
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 290
Default RE: LS1

If the C5 Convertibles were slow (13.5 with ghetto gears), does that mean our new GT's are SUPER slow(13.8)? 13.5 is not slow and remember, the LS1 will bitch slap us on Top-End.
Old Mar 28, 2007 | 08:37 PM
  #116  
blue02formula's Avatar
blue02formula
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 6
From:
Default RE: LS1

I need one of them ram air hoods so I can be fast.
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 01:11 PM
  #117  
TommyV8's Avatar
TommyV8
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,438
From: St. Louis
Default RE: LS1

ORIGINAL: 05MidBlueGT

If the C5 Convertibles were slow (13.5 with ghetto gears), does that mean our new GT's are SUPER slow(13.8)? 13.5 is not slow and remember, the LS1 will bitch slap us on Top-End.
It's all relative. BTW, a new Mustang GT is a pretty damn good race for an LS1 F-body. I know from experience.
Old Apr 4, 2007 | 04:59 PM
  #118  
ShaneD's Avatar
ShaneD
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 76
From: Green Bay, Wi
Default RE: LS1

LSX engines suck
Old Apr 4, 2007 | 11:14 PM
  #119  
05MidBlueGT's Avatar
05MidBlueGT
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 290
Default RE: LS1

Yeah, but the old LS1 always bitch slaps our GT on top-end.
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 12:54 PM
  #120  
TommyV8's Avatar
TommyV8
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,438
From: St. Louis
Default RE: LS1

I wouldn't say bitch slap, crawl away maybe (at least that's how my race with an S197 GT went).



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:54 PM.