no we were having some fun seeing what my pony can do

yall dont get it yall underestamate classics

 

Not with my 3.73 gears. My car sucks on the top end.

 

Stock for stock the majority of the new cars are faster than the older ones. There are ofcourse a few older cars that are faster than some of the newer ones, but for the most part, Newer=faster. So you know the 1966 mustang GT was quite a bit slower than an 01 mustang GT. 1966 Mustang GT only had 200hp base, 225hp Challenger model, or the 271hp Challenger High-performance V-8. The 271hp GT was 0-60 in 7.6 seconds and 15.9 in the 1/4 mile.

 

He has a 6 cylinder. A newer V6 could beat a stock 1966 V8. A newer V8 vs a 1966 6 cylinder? It would be like me vs Tito Ortiz.

 

Yeah, Tito woul get his a*s mauled and then thoroughly fondled
I call BS, or he was playing games with you. Hopefull the latter of the two.

 

Hey Slick, I cant believe you brought this here from the classics section. I wasn't serious when I suggested that.
But you got basically what I thought you would here! You are making the rest of us classics look bad. "Dont underestimate a classic"? Im happy if my warm 289 keeps up with any reasonable modern car, let alone a supercharged v8! Your six would be lucky to get out of its own way! lol

 

your 1966 6 would never "hang with me" you need a reality check bro.

 

Those '66 6cyl Stangs are bada$$. Got smoked by one last week!![sm=bs.gif][sm=bs.gif][sm=bs.gif]

 

dude i have seen a stock 66 6cly smoke a ferrari enzo, like it smoked the **** out of it!!!!!!!!!!! lmao!!

 

i never once said that i beat him just caught up to him