the mach vs gt
2nd Gear Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 210
From:
RE: the mach vs gt
ORIGINAL: radaman
Manual mach's run 13.5 or better and auto's 13.5 or worse. I avg low 13's in my car therefore can run with stock manual mach's and smoke auto mach's.
ORIGINAL: awnumber1
I dont get your post
ORIGINAL: radaman
Mach's are awesome right out of the box. It took me a god deal of money to be able to beat stock ones (manuals), but I smoke auto mach's (even mildly modded ones) all day. The manulas are hella quich though and Ive beaten some as well. Im looking into buying a auto mach soon and add full exhaust, 4:30's (staying n/a), 3400+ stall and some nitto dr's.
ORIGINAL: fishyducky
tonight went to chill with a friend in greenville. well we hit the highway and raced numerous times mostly from rolls at about 40. we were dead even most races and i didnt start pulling away until 90+.
he has off road x pipe, loudmouth 2 catback, dyno tune, and 4.10s.
tonight went to chill with a friend in greenville. well we hit the highway and raced numerous times mostly from rolls at about 40. we were dead even most races and i didnt start pulling away until 90+.
he has off road x pipe, loudmouth 2 catback, dyno tune, and 4.10s.
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 322
From: Havelock, NC
RE: the mach vs gt
well he did hang with me, no doubt.
but yes stock machs do run 13.5 or better with good driver....i obviously need a better driver mod lol.
edit: my best time so far is a 13.62.
but yes stock machs do run 13.5 or better with good driver....i obviously need a better driver mod lol.
edit: my best time so far is a 13.62.
2nd Gear Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 210
From:
RE: the mach vs gt
ORIGINAL: fishyducky
well he did hang with me, no doubt.
but yes stock machs do run 13.5 or better with good driver....i obviously need a better driver mod lol.
edit: my best time so far is a 13.62.
well he did hang with me, no doubt.
but yes stock machs do run 13.5 or better with good driver....i obviously need a better driver mod lol.
edit: my best time so far is a 13.62.
oh i didnt know they could. Whats the fastest anyone ever seen(or heard of) one going?
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 322
From: Havelock, NC
RE: the mach vs gt
ORIGINAL: awnumber1
oh i didnt know they could. Whats the fastest anyone ever seen(or heard of) one going?
ORIGINAL: fishyducky
well he did hang with me, no doubt.
but yes stock machs do run 13.5 or better with good driver....i obviously need a better driver mod lol.
edit: my best time so far is a 13.62.
well he did hang with me, no doubt.
but yes stock machs do run 13.5 or better with good driver....i obviously need a better driver mod lol.
edit: my best time so far is a 13.62.
oh i didnt know they could. Whats the fastest anyone ever seen(or heard of) one going?
i have heard of them running 13.3 stock. some run 12.8 with just exhaust, intake, and tires.
3rd Gear Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 627
From: Oahu, Hawaii
RE: the mach vs gt
ORIGINAL: radaman
Manual mach's run 13.5 or better and auto's 13.5 or worse. I avg low 13's in my car therefore can run with stock manual mach's and smoke auto mach's.
ORIGINAL: awnumber1
I dont get your post
ORIGINAL: radaman
Mach's are awesome right out of the box. It took me a god deal of money to be able to beat stock ones (manuals), but I smoke auto mach's (even mildly modded ones) all day. The manulas are hella quich though and Ive beaten some as well. Im looking into buying a auto mach soon and add full exhaust, 4:30's (staying n/a), 3400+ stall and some nitto dr's.
ORIGINAL: fishyducky
tonight went to chill with a friend in greenville. well we hit the highway and raced numerous times mostly from rolls at about 40. we were dead even most races and i didnt start pulling away until 90+.
he has off road x pipe, loudmouth 2 catback, dyno tune, and 4.10s.
tonight went to chill with a friend in greenville. well we hit the highway and raced numerous times mostly from rolls at about 40. we were dead even most races and i didnt start pulling away until 90+.
he has off road x pipe, loudmouth 2 catback, dyno tune, and 4.10s.
2nd Gear Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 211
RE: the mach vs gt
I know a guy with mach, he has long tube headers and exhaust, and then otherwise stock engine. He done some suspencion work, and it goes high 12 seconds on street tires. 
The guy is bracket racer with some experience. The only thing I can think of is that your mach is auto and you started with wrong gear, or you have manual and you started with wrong gear. 40 mph is 2nd gear right around 1500 rpms, crappy start brotha. Get it into sweet spot, 3000 rpm and on, then race.
The guy is bracket racer with some experience. The only thing I can think of is that your mach is auto and you started with wrong gear, or you have manual and you started with wrong gear. 40 mph is 2nd gear right around 1500 rpms, crappy start brotha. Get it into sweet spot, 3000 rpm and on, then race.
6th Gear Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,828
From: Clarksville TN
RE: the mach vs gt
ORIGINAL: shifterdelux
I know a guy with mach, he has long tube headers and exhaust, and then otherwise stock engine. He done some suspencion work, and it goes high 12 seconds on street tires.
The guy is bracket racer with some experience. The only thing I can think of is that your mach is auto and you started with wrong gear, or you have manual and you started with wrong gear. 40 mph is 2nd gear right around 1500 rpms, crappy start brotha. Get it into sweet spot, 3000 rpm and on, then race.
I know a guy with mach, he has long tube headers and exhaust, and then otherwise stock engine. He done some suspencion work, and it goes high 12 seconds on street tires.
The guy is bracket racer with some experience. The only thing I can think of is that your mach is auto and you started with wrong gear, or you have manual and you started with wrong gear. 40 mph is 2nd gear right around 1500 rpms, crappy start brotha. Get it into sweet spot, 3000 rpm and on, then race.
poptart tits
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,886
From: Texas
RE: the mach vs gt
ORIGINAL: awnumber1
Are you saying that you dont belive i hung with him? I dont think a stock mach can run 13.5, much less better
ORIGINAL: radaman
Manual mach's run 13.5 or better and auto's 13.5 or worse. I avg low 13's in my car therefore can run with stock manual mach's and smoke auto mach's.
ORIGINAL: awnumber1
I dont get your post
ORIGINAL: radaman
Mach's are awesome right out of the box. It took me a god deal of money to be able to beat stock ones (manuals), but I smoke auto mach's (even mildly modded ones) all day. The manulas are hella quich though and Ive beaten some as well. Im looking into buying a auto mach soon and add full exhaust, 4:30's (staying n/a), 3400+ stall and some nitto dr's.
ORIGINAL: fishyducky
tonight went to chill with a friend in greenville. well we hit the highway and raced numerous times mostly from rolls at about 40. we were dead even most races and i didnt start pulling away until 90+.
he has off road x pipe, loudmouth 2 catback, dyno tune, and 4.10s.
tonight went to chill with a friend in greenville. well we hit the highway and raced numerous times mostly from rolls at about 40. we were dead even most races and i didnt start pulling away until 90+.
he has off road x pipe, loudmouth 2 catback, dyno tune, and 4.10s.
Those machs are pretty nasty from a dig. They mod extremely well too.