New here
ORIGINAL: Quick Shot xMLx
LMAO, what about all those 3rd Gens that I smoke on my 21 Speed Bicycle?
Oh snap cheap shot
Guess we don't speak of any contemporary F-Body before the LT1?
ORIGINAL: stanger88
I can't argue, most mustangs do get bent over when we run into them on the street
ORIGINAL: snakeman4life
No,F-body owners prefer action of the four legged variety.
No,F-body owners prefer action of the four legged variety.
I can't argue, most mustangs do get bent over when we run into them on the street
Oh snap cheap shot
Guess we don't speak of any contemporary F-Body before the LT1?
What about all the 96-98 GT's that these 15+yo 3rd gens can beat? My friend ran 14.4 with his M5 305 3rd gen with only intake and exhaust.
OH SNAP, I guess the mod motors dont get much nut hugging until 05, do they? Wow, you STILL woulda thought ford could beat GM's 4th gen with their 5th gen. Sigh, some things never change
ORIGINAL: stanger88
Wow, you STILL woulda thought ford could beat GM's 4th gen with their 5th gen. Sigh, some things never change
Wow, you STILL woulda thought ford could beat GM's 4th gen with their 5th gen. Sigh, some things never change
2004-2005 mustang sales = 272,000
2004-2005 camaro sales = 0
ohh shnap! [sm=smiley3.gif][sm=smiley36.gif]
ORIGINAL: HC_CrAzYHoRsE
i thought the sales pretty much indicated who won that war...
2004-2005 mustang sales = 272,000
2004-2005 camaro sales = 0
ohh shnap! [sm=smiley3.gif][sm=smiley36.gif]
ORIGINAL: stanger88
Wow, you STILL woulda thought ford could beat GM's 4th gen with their 5th gen. Sigh, some things never change
Wow, you STILL woulda thought ford could beat GM's 4th gen with their 5th gen. Sigh, some things never change
2004-2005 mustang sales = 272,000
2004-2005 camaro sales = 0
ohh shnap! [sm=smiley3.gif][sm=smiley36.gif]
I think that DOES sum it up, a dime-a-dozen car for the masses. Everyone knows the mustang is more of a compromise than the F-body when it comes to how it was built. Mustang is meant for EVERYONE (hence the 4X4 stance, the dryer dial steering, and the auto transmission calibrated to the same shift firmness as a towncar), the F-body was meant more for purists.
ORIGINAL: stanger88
I think that DOES sum it up, a dime-a-dozen car for the masses. Everyone knows the mustang is more of a compromise than the F-body when it comes to how it was built. Mustang is meant for EVERYONE (hence the 4X4 stance, the dryer dial steering, and the auto transmission calibrated to the same shift firmness as a towncar), the F-body was meant more for purists.
ORIGINAL: HC_CrAzYHoRsE
i thought the sales pretty much indicated who won that war...
2004-2005 mustang sales = 272,000
2004-2005 camaro sales = 0
ohh shnap! [sm=smiley3.gif][sm=smiley36.gif]
ORIGINAL: stanger88
Wow, you STILL woulda thought ford could beat GM's 4th gen with their 5th gen. Sigh, some things never change
Wow, you STILL woulda thought ford could beat GM's 4th gen with their 5th gen. Sigh, some things never change
2004-2005 mustang sales = 272,000
2004-2005 camaro sales = 0
ohh shnap! [sm=smiley3.gif][sm=smiley36.gif]
I think that DOES sum it up, a dime-a-dozen car for the masses. Everyone knows the mustang is more of a compromise than the F-body when it comes to how it was built. Mustang is meant for EVERYONE (hence the 4X4 stance, the dryer dial steering, and the auto transmission calibrated to the same shift firmness as a towncar), the F-body was meant more for purists.
ORIGINAL: HC_CrAzYHoRsE
sorta like the foxbody i guess
ORIGINAL: stanger88
I think that DOES sum it up, a dime-a-dozen car for the masses. Everyone knows the mustang is more of a compromise than the F-body when it comes to how it was built. Mustang is meant for EVERYONE (hence the 4X4 stance, the dryer dial steering, and the auto transmission calibrated to the same shift firmness as a towncar), the F-body was meant more for purists.
ORIGINAL: HC_CrAzYHoRsE
i thought the sales pretty much indicated who won that war...
2004-2005 mustang sales = 272,000
2004-2005 camaro sales = 0
ohh shnap! [sm=smiley3.gif][sm=smiley36.gif]
ORIGINAL: stanger88
Wow, you STILL woulda thought ford could beat GM's 4th gen with their 5th gen. Sigh, some things never change
Wow, you STILL woulda thought ford could beat GM's 4th gen with their 5th gen. Sigh, some things never change
2004-2005 mustang sales = 272,000
2004-2005 camaro sales = 0
ohh shnap! [sm=smiley3.gif][sm=smiley36.gif]
I think that DOES sum it up, a dime-a-dozen car for the masses. Everyone knows the mustang is more of a compromise than the F-body when it comes to how it was built. Mustang is meant for EVERYONE (hence the 4X4 stance, the dryer dial steering, and the auto transmission calibrated to the same shift firmness as a towncar), the F-body was meant more for purists.
ORIGINAL: HC_CrAzYHoRsE
ewww!! who needs a car that can "handle" and turn ? i thought you were a purist ?
ewww!! who needs a car that can "handle" and turn ? i thought you were a purist ?
Purist in that I like something that is for pure performance, unlike the mustang which is designed as a total compromise, to go off-road, has an auto that shifts smooth so old ladies wont spill their geritol in the back seat, and an imprecise steering wheel.
ORIGINAL: HC_CrAzYHoRsE
yeah i see old ladies go offroading in stangs all the time, i guess i never made the connection ti'll now ...thanks for showing me the way
yeah i see old ladies go offroading in stangs all the time, i guess i never made the connection ti'll now ...thanks for showing me the way
We had a lady come into service with a mustang at my dealership that couldnt even walk without a cane. If you look at the ground clearance the offroad part becomes immediately beliveable


