stock vs stock
4th Gear Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,209
From:
RE: stock vs stock
I don't think I've ever heard of a '06 Si running 14.7 stock,low 15s is about the best.And as far as boost goes,I know it's a different car and it's a supercharger vs a turbo,but the stage2 kit for Cavabalt SS bumps the boost to 15psi[from 12psi stock]and is good for about 40hp,but it does include injectors,tune, and the pulley.Still I can't see a stock v6 beating a GTi.
5th Gear Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,926
From:
RE: stock vs stock
ORIGINAL: Alero99
GTI all the way sorry dude... its 2.0 turbo charged rated at i believe 200hp... and if im correct you 6ers aren't putting any where near 200 to the crank...
GTI all the way sorry dude... its 2.0 turbo charged rated at i believe 200hp... and if im correct you 6ers aren't putting any where near 200 to the crank...
What are the top of the line N/A cars of the same bodystyle? I was driving the other day and was playing with a 2004 or newer V-dub hatch after he did a little fly-bye on me at like 55mph, i attempted to shut him down and was catching him and starting to pull hard at about 85, then we had to shut down and brake because of traffic. I know he wasnt turbo, but the car was nice. Not sure what it was. Any ideas?
4th Gear Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,209
From:
RE: stock vs stock
ORIGINAL: Clif Brohn
Nope, 193 isnt ANYWHERE near 200. At all. Pull your hand out of your ***. Yes indeed though, GTi has it. Lighter and more power. Its all good though.
What are the top of the line N/A cars of the same bodystyle? I was driving the other day and was playing with a 2004 or newer V-dub hatch after he did a little fly-bye on me at like 55mph, i attempted to shut him down and was catching him and starting to pull hard at about 85, then we had to shut down and brake because of traffic. I know he wasnt turbo, but the car was nice. Not sure what it was. Any ideas?
ORIGINAL: Alero99
GTI all the way sorry dude... its 2.0 turbo charged rated at i believe 200hp... and if im correct you 6ers aren't putting any where near 200 to the crank...
GTI all the way sorry dude... its 2.0 turbo charged rated at i believe 200hp... and if im correct you 6ers aren't putting any where near 200 to the crank...
What are the top of the line N/A cars of the same bodystyle? I was driving the other day and was playing with a 2004 or newer V-dub hatch after he did a little fly-bye on me at like 55mph, i attempted to shut him down and was catching him and starting to pull hard at about 85, then we had to shut down and brake because of traffic. I know he wasnt turbo, but the car was nice. Not sure what it was. Any ideas?
5th Gear Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,926
From:
RE: stock vs stock
ORIGINAL: snakeman4life
Thats not gonna smell good.
ORIGINAL: Clif Brohn
Nope, 193 isnt ANYWHERE near 200. At all. Pull your hand out of your ***. Yes indeed though, GTi has it. Lighter and more power. Its all good though.
What are the top of the line N/A cars of the same bodystyle? I was driving the other day and was playing with a 2004 or newer V-dub hatch after he did a little fly-bye on me at like 55mph, i attempted to shut him down and was catching him and starting to pull hard at about 85, then we had to shut down and brake because of traffic. I know he wasnt turbo, but the car was nice. Not sure what it was. Any ideas?
ORIGINAL: Alero99
GTI all the way sorry dude... its 2.0 turbo charged rated at i believe 200hp... and if im correct you 6ers aren't putting any where near 200 to the crank...
GTI all the way sorry dude... its 2.0 turbo charged rated at i believe 200hp... and if im correct you 6ers aren't putting any where near 200 to the crank...
What are the top of the line N/A cars of the same bodystyle? I was driving the other day and was playing with a 2004 or newer V-dub hatch after he did a little fly-bye on me at like 55mph, i attempted to shut him down and was catching him and starting to pull hard at about 85, then we had to shut down and brake because of traffic. I know he wasnt turbo, but the car was nice. Not sure what it was. Any ideas?
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,154
From: WA
RE: stock vs stock
gti=180hp mustang v6=190hp
gti=2900lbs mustang v6=3100 lbs
gti=173 torque mustang v6=225 torque
Someone please tell me how the gti is faster. I'm probably just dumb so someone should inform me :]
gti=2900lbs mustang v6=3100 lbs
gti=173 torque mustang v6=225 torque
Someone please tell me how the gti is faster. I'm probably just dumb so someone should inform me :]
5th Gear Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,151
From: Charlotte, NC
RE: stock vs stock
ORIGINAL: Flake6899
gti=180hp mustang v6=190hp
gti=2900lbs mustang v6=3100 lbs
gti=173 torque mustang v6=225 torque
Someone please tell me how the gti is faster. I'm probably just dumb so someone should inform me :]
gti=180hp mustang v6=190hp
gti=2900lbs mustang v6=3100 lbs
gti=173 torque mustang v6=225 torque
Someone please tell me how the gti is faster. I'm probably just dumb so someone should inform me :]
5th Gear Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,926
From:
RE: stock vs stock
The GTi and V6 stang make VERY similar HP and TQ numbers, but split port V6 mustangs are just slow. Sorry dude, but its true. I own one, and there is a vast amount of potential, but these things are just dag nasty slow. You also have to consider the torque curves, and where in the RPM ranges the two motors make hp. Lots of things that account for a car's speed and acceleration.