2006 v6 mustang vs 2006 Hemi Charger
04-22-2007, 03:13 PM
#21
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Posts: 188
RE: 2006 v6 mustang vs 2006 Hemi Charger
Just intake and exhaust...All other modifications are body and rims, most money is in my suspenion work, for handling...
yes it was a auto...its a 03-04 5.7 liter 350 hp...im sure you know that.
The video is fromt the inside of my car.
-justin
yes it was a auto...its a 03-04 5.7 liter 350 hp...im sure you know that.
The video is fromt the inside of my car.
-justin
04-22-2007, 03:20 PM
#22
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Posts: 188
RE: 2006 v6 mustang vs 2006 Hemi Charger
Here are the specs...
http://www.car-videos.net/performanc...=280&id2=0
I can only find manual...
http://www.car-videos.net/performanc...=280&id2=0
I can only find manual...
04-22-2007, 03:37 PM
#23
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,609
RE: 2006 v6 mustang vs 2006 Hemi Charger
ORIGINAL: Jweezy
Here are the specs...
http://www.car-videos.net/performanc...=280&id2=0
I can only find manual...
Here are the specs...
http://www.car-videos.net/performanc...=280&id2=0
I can only find manual...
Also i've messed around w/ rt's before, they were no problem. I had him off the line and he wasnt gaining...
Which brings me to my next statment, if i lost to a buddys ls1 TA (not by much, atleast down low) and i can beat a rt; well leave it at that. Also the cobras before 03/04 pretty much had the same motor as the 03/04 mach1's, there 320hp. And they also run into the 13's np.
I'm not trying to ding in your skin but like rot said; your car that runs on avg in the 14s, is not faster then a car that runs on avg 13's.
04-22-2007, 04:00 PM
#24
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Posts: 188
RE: 2006 v6 mustang vs 2006 Hemi Charger
Like I said, I know some fast chargers, and I know some very slow ones. I personally have never seen a Charger (IN PERSON) run in the 14s...I know some have...but not in person...I have seen SRTs run high 12s, and R/T mid to high 13s...
I have seen some chargers run mid 9s on the quarter...but then again, I seen the mustangs running the same. Some lower some higher...
But these are over 4000 pound cars...
Where do you live...I will race you...I cant tell you what other chargers do, I can only really stand up for mine.
You say Chargers are no problem, I say Mustangs are no problem.
I have seen some chargers run mid 9s on the quarter...but then again, I seen the mustangs running the same. Some lower some higher...
But these are over 4000 pound cars...
Where do you live...I will race you...I cant tell you what other chargers do, I can only really stand up for mine.
You say Chargers are no problem, I say Mustangs are no problem.
04-22-2007, 06:34 PM
#25
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 3,758
RE: 2006 v6 mustang vs 2006 Hemi Charger
Just a couple comments:
a) Thanks for the complements on my car Jweezy, I really do appreciate it.
b) ROTM wins funniest comment of the day award for referencing "extra high hp decals"
c) A PT Cruiser can be made to be VERY quick...considering it's got essentially the same motor as an SRT4.
d) No full weight, stock motor, NA, stock suspension RT has ever run a mid 13. Until proven otherwise I will rely on the 15-20 R/T Chargers that I have seen run 14.30s-15.20s.
By "run xxx" are you referring to the best run ever done, the best the car is capable of, or the *normal* run done by said car?
Here let me break down how big of a difference these things are using my car as an example:
Best run: 12.77 @ 108.8
Capable of: 12.40s @ 108-110
*Normal* run: 12.90-13.10
My point: SRT8 anythings don't "run high 12s" just because one of them once ran a 12.9x stock except for tires. They "run" low-high 13s depending on the driver. An R/T Charger doesn't "run mid-high 13s" just because someone once ran a 13.6 on the stock motor with full bolt-ons, tires, and weight reduction. I don't "run low 12s" though I could with a 1.75 60' or better, I "run" high 12s with good tires, and high 12s to low 13s with bad tires.
a) Thanks for the complements on my car Jweezy, I really do appreciate it.
b) ROTM wins funniest comment of the day award for referencing "extra high hp decals"
c) A PT Cruiser can be made to be VERY quick...considering it's got essentially the same motor as an SRT4.
d) No full weight, stock motor, NA, stock suspension RT has ever run a mid 13. Until proven otherwise I will rely on the 15-20 R/T Chargers that I have seen run 14.30s-15.20s.
By "run xxx" are you referring to the best run ever done, the best the car is capable of, or the *normal* run done by said car?
Here let me break down how big of a difference these things are using my car as an example:
Best run: 12.77 @ 108.8
Capable of: 12.40s @ 108-110
*Normal* run: 12.90-13.10
My point: SRT8 anythings don't "run high 12s" just because one of them once ran a 12.9x stock except for tires. They "run" low-high 13s depending on the driver. An R/T Charger doesn't "run mid-high 13s" just because someone once ran a 13.6 on the stock motor with full bolt-ons, tires, and weight reduction. I don't "run low 12s" though I could with a 1.75 60' or better, I "run" high 12s with good tires, and high 12s to low 13s with bad tires.
04-22-2007, 07:37 PM
#26
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: same as you.
Posts: 3,287
RE: 2006 v6 mustang vs 2006 Hemi Charger
Yeah, I dont see a STOCK Charger going into the 13's. why dont you go to the Track and find out for urself
and dont do the stupid Well ive beat this car soooo im this fast crap... EVERYONE on here thats been to the Track has seen 12 second cars run 14x passes....
and dont do the stupid Well ive beat this car soooo im this fast crap... EVERYONE on here thats been to the Track has seen 12 second cars run 14x passes....
04-22-2007, 07:38 PM
#27
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location:
Posts: 21
RE: 2006 v6 mustang vs 2006 Hemi Charger
ORIGINAL: Sleeper05
Just a couple comments:
a) Thanks for the complements on my car Jweezy, I really do appreciate it.
b) ROTM wins funniest comment of the day award for referencing "extra high hp decals"
c) A PT Cruiser can be made to be VERY quick...considering it's got essentially the same motor as an SRT4.
d) No full weight, stock motor, NA, stock suspension RT has ever run a mid 13. Until proven otherwise I will rely on the 15-20 R/T Chargers that I have seen run 14.30s-15.20s.
By "run xxx" are you referring to the best run ever done, the best the car is capable of, or the *normal* run done by said car?
Here let me break down how big of a difference these things are using my car as an example:
Best run: 12.77 @ 108.8
Capable of: 12.40s @ 108-110
*Normal* run: 12.90-13.10
My point: SRT8 anythings don't "run high 12s" just because one of them once ran a 12.9x stock except for tires. They "run" low-high 13s depending on the driver. An R/T Charger doesn't "run mid-high 13s" just because someone once ran a 13.6 on the stock motor with full bolt-ons, tires, and weight reduction. I don't "run low 12s" though I could with a 1.75 60' or better, I "run" high 12s with good tires, and high 12s to low 13s with bad tires.
Just a couple comments:
a) Thanks for the complements on my car Jweezy, I really do appreciate it.
b) ROTM wins funniest comment of the day award for referencing "extra high hp decals"
c) A PT Cruiser can be made to be VERY quick...considering it's got essentially the same motor as an SRT4.
d) No full weight, stock motor, NA, stock suspension RT has ever run a mid 13. Until proven otherwise I will rely on the 15-20 R/T Chargers that I have seen run 14.30s-15.20s.
By "run xxx" are you referring to the best run ever done, the best the car is capable of, or the *normal* run done by said car?
Here let me break down how big of a difference these things are using my car as an example:
Best run: 12.77 @ 108.8
Capable of: 12.40s @ 108-110
*Normal* run: 12.90-13.10
My point: SRT8 anythings don't "run high 12s" just because one of them once ran a 12.9x stock except for tires. They "run" low-high 13s depending on the driver. An R/T Charger doesn't "run mid-high 13s" just because someone once ran a 13.6 on the stock motor with full bolt-ons, tires, and weight reduction. I don't "run low 12s" though I could with a 1.75 60' or better, I "run" high 12s with good tires, and high 12s to low 13s with bad tires.
BTW there many stock mid 13 RT's
04-22-2007, 08:36 PM
#29
I ♥ Acer
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,136
RE: 2006 v6 mustang vs 2006 Hemi Charger
ORIGINAL: Jweezy
Im sorry guys, but I beat 5.7 gtos, cobraz, not the more recent ones...but the ones EVERYBODY has.
trans-ams...many GTs...tuned S2000...i dont see a v6 keeping up with me...
Boost yes thats a different story, boosted nissan Z are fast, and alot of other cars on boost. But hey if they want boost, there is always a option for me to get boost too.
Sleeper05...that is one ****in slick mustang...nice setup...I would have done something similar but chargers dont look good with a stripe.
Im sorry guys, but I beat 5.7 gtos, cobraz, not the more recent ones...but the ones EVERYBODY has.
trans-ams...many GTs...tuned S2000...i dont see a v6 keeping up with me...
Boost yes thats a different story, boosted nissan Z are fast, and alot of other cars on boost. But hey if they want boost, there is always a option for me to get boost too.
Sleeper05...that is one ****in slick mustang...nice setup...I would have done something similar but chargers dont look good with a stripe.
I am sorry but I have to say it. You RICED out your car way to much. WTF is up with all the stickers? Boy I bet the orginal charger owners would roll over in there grave (figure of speech) if they saw the Japan ( or where ever there from) Yokohama sticker. Sorry but you look likea bloated ricer