whats sad is your car cant keep up with, um, anyone on here so hush?

 

he also has an F-body

 

so??? bring it to nashville and ill show ya an ugly vert that'll spank most f-body cars.with the bolt ons.......they are garbage.that is why chevy couldnt sell enough of them to justify the manufacturing expense.I dont give a rats a$$ what other people think about the ls1 engines, they are expensive to work on, rediculously limited amount of room to work on them,(ever put headers on 1? i have, wont do it again)and they are the only strong point in an f-body car.junk transmissions, junk rear ends, cost more to tune, and you have to buy one of those HUGE gold neclaces to drive one :-) ,jk.......dollar for dollar, the mustang will ALWAYS be a BETTER,FASTER car......................no matter the year.

 

Mullets = [sm=signs006.gif] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdegQmtgFSM

 

That's so wrong that I'm laughing my but off. Mustangs cost more than f-bodies and they're a heck of a lot slower. You can get an LT1 F-body for about 1 or 2 grand less than a 94-98 GT and they're a whole second faster in the 1/4 almost. And an LS1 F-body is a heck of a lot cheaper than a New Edge and once again .5 to a second faster in the quarter. I haven't seen a New Edge that doesn't need work for under $9000 and you can get an LS1 for around $8000 in perfect condition.

 

I hope you didnt just call a Foxbody an F-Body.. some of the mustang guys might hang you themselves....

 

Why does it matter? If we tell you that you lose will you back out of the race?

Just race him and stop adding to the multiple gay threads about who will win and who will lose...there is ony 1 way to find out

 

like the pole says "MY MUSTANG' would win

 

If i break out my 1969 camaro you both loose!

 

Why don't you just bring out your 1981 DeLorean and race them. Afterall, it has a flux capacitor.