Street/Strip Raced a guy from a light? Had that ride of yours on the timed track? Tell your story here.

LS1 crap!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 03:54 PM
  #61  
Stone629's Avatar
Stone629
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,302
From: North Carolina
Default RE: LS1 crap!!!

ORIGINAL: Stone629

The tranny maybe where we are having a miscommunication. I have only had auto LS1s and have never witnessed a 6-spd ls1 on the dyno. I know autos drain more power, but I justdidn't think it was that much. Either way, it obivously varies considerably from car to car.

Here's more of what is more common with bolt-ons and driveable cams.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4L4qVjAB5jg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUYFFsKFEpk
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 04:14 PM
  #62  
JD1969's Avatar
JD1969
Pro. B.S. caller outer
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 9,644
From: IL
Default RE: LS1 crap!!!

The trans will make a big differance as well as how big the converter is and if the converter is locked or unlocked during a dyno pull. My car made 393 when it was a 6 speed, I swapped in a 4L60E and a Yank 4000 converter. With no other changes I made 376. However the car went nearly .5 quicker. I am a cam/bolt on car and I run 11.8's @113-115 mph. Heads and short block are completley stock.
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 04:25 PM
  #63  
Stone629's Avatar
Stone629
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,302
From: North Carolina
Default RE: LS1 crap!!!

That would explain why my Z28 Dynoed so low HP wise. Full-bolt on and everything, but it was an A4 with a Raptor 3k stall. It put down a ton of torque though- 400rwtq. I never ran it with DRs to see what it could really do cause I feared the stock rear, but like you said, a good stall can knock off .5 tenths.
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 04:40 PM
  #64  
WRXtranceformed's Avatar
WRXtranceformed
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,248
From: NC
Default RE: LS1 crap!!!

I've heard converters will cause you to put down really high torque numbers but lower hp numbers. Is that generally true?
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 04:45 PM
  #65  
Stone629's Avatar
Stone629
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,302
From: North Carolina
Default RE: LS1 crap!!!

ORIGINAL: WRXtranceformed

I've heard converters will cause you to put down really high torque numbers but lower hp numbers. Is that generally true?
That was the case with my converter...330rwhp vs. 400rwtq.
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 05:00 PM
  #66  
JD1969's Avatar
JD1969
Pro. B.S. caller outer
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 9,644
From: IL
Default RE: LS1 crap!!!

It depends on the STR (stall torque ratio) of the converter, but generally this is true. BTW I am pulling consistant 1.5x 60's on a bone stock 3.42 geared 10 bolt. Autos are much easier on the rears
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 07:32 PM
  #67  
nickdotcom2.0's Avatar
nickdotcom2.0
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 148
From:
Default RE: LS1 crap!!!

i also put down 393 JD, but in a completly different way
Old Oct 26, 2007 | 07:49 AM
  #68  
S8ER01Z's Avatar
S8ER01Z
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,565
From: NC
Default RE: LS1 crap!!!


ORIGINAL: JD1969

It depends on the STR (stall torque ratio) of the converter, but generally this is true. BTW I am pulling consistant 1.5x 60's on a bone stock 3.42 geared 10 bolt. Autos are much easier on the rears
Unless you do stupid **** like dry pavement doughnuts.... A LOT.

My rearend grenaded under near stock power.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StalkerGT
5.0L General Discussion
19
Nov 28, 2015 03:09 PM
ChampInSD
5.0L GT S550 Tech
13
Oct 2, 2015 04:55 AM
yourmom6990
Archive - Parts For Sale
2
Sep 14, 2015 10:52 PM
Mobiusone stang
2005-2014 Mustangs
7
Sep 7, 2015 08:46 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:36 PM.