98 GT Question
4th Gear Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,196
From: Georgia
RE: 98 GT Question
yea, plus 200 rwhp doesnt seam realistic. They make only make 225 bhp and that was 10 years ago. So your saying they only loose ~11% in the drive train?[&:]
I think 185-190 is much more realistic. Not sure how they respond to mods but it really depends on how restrictive the stock setup was.
I think 185-190 is much more realistic. Not sure how they respond to mods but it really depends on how restrictive the stock setup was.
5th Gear Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,007
From: carlisle PA
RE: 98 GT Question
ORIGINAL: The Stig
yea, plus 200 rwhp doesnt seam realistic. They make only make 225 bhp and that was 10 years ago. So your saying they only loose ~11% in the drive train?[&:]
I think 185-190 is much more realistic. Not sure how they respond to mods but it really depends on how restrictive the stock setup was.
yea, plus 200 rwhp doesnt seam realistic. They make only make 225 bhp and that was 10 years ago. So your saying they only loose ~11% in the drive train?[&:]
I think 185-190 is much more realistic. Not sure how they respond to mods but it really depends on how restrictive the stock setup was.
6th Gear Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 11,565
From: Jersey
RE: 98 GT Question
ORIGINAL: silverstang1996
nono, iwhine is correct. stock they put about 180ishRWHP, with all that he's at about 200RWHP, and in the 260-270rwtq range. tell me i'm wrong? my auto non-pi dynoed it's numbers in my sig w/ just 75mm throttlebody/plenum and a catback.
ORIGINAL: The Stig
yea, plus 200 rwhp doesnt seam realistic. They make only make 225 bhp and that was 10 years ago. So your saying they only loose ~11% in the drive train?[&:]
I think 185-190 is much more realistic. Not sure how they respond to mods but it really depends on how restrictive the stock setup was.
yea, plus 200 rwhp doesnt seam realistic. They make only make 225 bhp and that was 10 years ago. So your saying they only loose ~11% in the drive train?[&:]
I think 185-190 is much more realistic. Not sure how they respond to mods but it really depends on how restrictive the stock setup was.
4th Gear Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,196
From: Georgia
RE: 98 GT Question
ORIGINAL: silverstang1996
nono, iwhine is correct. stock they put about 180ishRWHP, with all that he's at about 200RWHP, and in the 260-270rwtq range. tell me i'm wrong? my auto non-pi dynoed it's numbers in my sig w/ just 75mm throttlebody/plenum and a catback.
ORIGINAL: The Stig
yea, plus 200 rwhp doesnt seam realistic. They make only make 225 bhp and that was 10 years ago. So your saying they only loose ~11% in the drive train?[&:]
I think 185-190 is much more realistic. Not sure how they respond to mods but it really depends on how restrictive the stock setup was.
yea, plus 200 rwhp doesnt seam realistic. They make only make 225 bhp and that was 10 years ago. So your saying they only loose ~11% in the drive train?[&:]
I think 185-190 is much more realistic. Not sure how they respond to mods but it really depends on how restrictive the stock setup was.
And you said i was wrong but iwhine was right? I was agreeing with iwhine. Note the "yea, plus..."
Penis Mod Erator
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,531
From: Calgary Eh?
RE: 98 GT Question
all I know is I took my buddys 98 with a full exhaust and a fenderwall CAI with my GP GTP (gtp's only mods are a K&N CAI) at the track
It feels fast inside, but just didn't perform
It feels fast inside, but just didn't perform
5th Gear Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,007
From: carlisle PA
RE: 98 GT Question
ORIGINAL: The Stig
er, what? I said 185-190, you said 180ish? so I was wrong becuase I was 5"ish" off? I think thats pretty reasonable for an estimate?
And you said i was wrong but iwhine was right? I was agreeing with iwhine. Note the "yea, plus..."
ORIGINAL: silverstang1996
nono, iwhine is correct. stock they put about 180ishRWHP, with all that he's at about 200RWHP, and in the 260-270rwtq range. tell me i'm wrong? my auto non-pi dynoed it's numbers in my sig w/ just 75mm throttlebody/plenum and a catback.
ORIGINAL: The Stig
yea, plus 200 rwhp doesnt seam realistic. They make only make 225 bhp and that was 10 years ago. So your saying they only loose ~11% in the drive train?[&:]
I think 185-190 is much more realistic. Not sure how they respond to mods but it really depends on how restrictive the stock setup was.
yea, plus 200 rwhp doesnt seam realistic. They make only make 225 bhp and that was 10 years ago. So your saying they only loose ~11% in the drive train?[&:]
I think 185-190 is much more realistic. Not sure how they respond to mods but it really depends on how restrictive the stock setup was.
And you said i was wrong but iwhine was right? I was agreeing with iwhine. Note the "yea, plus..."
which means, unless like i said you presented what you're saying wrong, you are saying that 185-190rwhp is more realistic with a car with those mods, but you don't know for sure because you don't know how restrictive the stock setup was. Now from reading your post I believe you are talking of it stock, but you just messed your words up which confused me quite a bit.
4th Gear Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,196
From: Georgia
RE: 98 GT Question
ORIGINAL: silverstang1996
no buddy, unless you are presenting what you're saying wrong, you're still wrong. 180ishrwhp is what a stock non-pi GT would put down, a GT with the mods the OP talks of would be around 200rwhp. and really you can't find an excuse because i quote, "I think 185-190 is much more realistic. Not sure how they respond to mods but it really depends on how restrictive the stock setup was."
which means, unless like i said you presented what you're saying wrong, you are saying that 185-190rwhp is more realistic with a car with those mods, but you don't know for sure because you don't know how restrictive the stock setup was. Now from reading your post I believe you are talking of it stock, but you just messed your words up which confused me quite a bit.
ORIGINAL: The Stig
yea, plus 200 rwhp doesnt seam realistic. They make only make 225 bhp and that was 10 years ago. So your saying they only loose ~11% in the drive train?
I think 185-190 is much more realistic. Not sure how they respond to mods but it really depends on how restrictive the stock setup was.
yea, plus 200 rwhp doesnt seam realistic. They make only make 225 bhp and that was 10 years ago. So your saying they only loose ~11% in the drive train?
I think 185-190 is much more realistic. Not sure how they respond to mods but it really depends on how restrictive the stock setup was.
which means, unless like i said you presented what you're saying wrong, you are saying that 185-190rwhp is more realistic with a car with those mods, but you don't know for sure because you don't know how restrictive the stock setup was. Now from reading your post I believe you are talking of it stock, but you just messed your words up which confused me quite a bit.