LeBaron vs. Mustang
Disclaimer: I'm new to cars/racing. However I have a friend who is a little full of himself. He drives a 3.5 L V6 supercharged 94 LeBaron and makes off like he's hot crap. He was also bragging how he beat a Mustang off the light a few days ago. I was talking to him about whose car is the faster, and he was arguing that even though his car is heavier, all his power is in torque; ergo he has an edge. What do you guys think? For the record, I drive a stock '99 Mustang and both cars are auto.
Your friend is full of ****.
1:There was no 3.5 V6 in a LeBaron. The 3.0 V6 was around 145 hp and good for low 16's/ high 15's on a really good day.
2: Who the hell would waste thier time and money supercharging one?
3: The Chrysler FWD transmission would shred itself if someone did decide to supercharge one.
1:There was no 3.5 V6 in a LeBaron. The 3.0 V6 was around 145 hp and good for low 16's/ high 15's on a really good day.
2: Who the hell would waste thier time and money supercharging one?
3: The Chrysler FWD transmission would shred itself if someone did decide to supercharge one.
ORIGINAL: Jim H.
For the record, I drive a stock '99 Mustang and both cars are auto.
For the record, I drive a stock '99 Mustang and both cars are auto.
do you mean a 2.5L engine, and turbocharged? ive seen many different variations of the "turbo dodges", and lebarons did come with some factory turbo models. but the V6s were not very strong, and i would be surprised to see one get anywhere near the 15s.
Is it possible his car had an engine swap? I'm kinda happy to hear that I have a good shot @ beating him though...but there's one iissue...driving experience in "race" situations...I have none [&o]


