Street/Strip Raced a guy from a light? Had that ride of yours on the timed track? Tell your story here.

2010 Mustang

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 1, 2008 | 08:56 PM
  #1  
The Stig's Avatar
The Stig
Thread Starter
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,196
From: Georgia
Default 2010 Mustang

So, I got my new issue of Car & Driver today. And the cover caught my eye, has the new 2010 mustang, same basic body style. But they claim the 2011 model will have a 6.2L 400bhp V8.

Assuming the weight is about the same as the current S197. This thing could seriously compete with the new Z28. Hard to guestimate a 1/4 time as we dont know everything thats changed, but it looks like a 12 second car.

Any thoughts?
Old May 1, 2008 | 09:01 PM
  #2  
Sarge_13's Avatar
Sarge_13
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,355
From: San Antonio, Texas
Default RE: 2010 Mustang

Link to article or ban.
Old May 1, 2008 | 09:05 PM
  #3  
SINISTER's Avatar
SINISTER
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,284
From: Miami, FL
Default RE: 2010 Mustang

My thoughts: You think you're funny.

I find it hard to believe Ford would put that in a production car. They never appear to be all that concerned with performance.
Old May 1, 2008 | 09:07 PM
  #4  
Sarge_13's Avatar
Sarge_13
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,355
From: San Antonio, Texas
Default RE: 2010 Mustang

ORIGINAL: SINISTER

My thoughts: You think you're funny.

I find it hard to believe Ford would put that in a production car. They never appear to be all that concerned with performance.
Ford GT or almost anything to pass through SVT ring any bells to you? Guess not...
Old May 1, 2008 | 09:45 PM
  #5  
mustangcat's Avatar
mustangcat
Deputy CatDog - To Purr'tect and Explode
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,900
From: NM
Default RE: 2010 Mustang

Well, larger displacement is what everyones been asking for in a Ford.
I'm just not sure Ford will do it, they've been known for being underdogs with smaller displacement, a 6.2L Behemoth would kind of undermind that style of sales. Keep in mind CAFE regulations are coming up fast, and having a huge displacement engine only for a few years would be kind of pointless(I'm talking about you, Dodge). I think a 5.0, 5.4, or 5.8 would be more up Ford's alley.
Old May 1, 2008 | 09:52 PM
  #6  
bluebeastsrt's Avatar
bluebeastsrt
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 11,565
From: Jersey
Default RE: 2010 Mustang

I was thinking about buying the camaro next year but I might hold out for the mustang now. If you can get a 400Hp mustang for close to what a GT goes for today, I'm in where do I sign?
Old May 1, 2008 | 09:54 PM
  #7  
The Stig's Avatar
The Stig
Thread Starter
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,196
From: Georgia
Default RE: 2010 Mustang

ORIGINAL: Sarge_13

Link to article or ban.
ORIGINAL: SINISTER

My thoughts: You think you're funny.
lmao, so much for my credibility. Anyway, I took some pics of the magazine for you guys. You cant read the article becuase its too small, but you can clearly see on the cover "6.2-LITER 400-HP V-8"









Old May 1, 2008 | 10:00 PM
  #8  
Mishri's Avatar
Mishri
Mish-ogynist
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,784
From: Helena, MT
Default RE: 2010 Mustang

obvious photoshop job
Old May 1, 2008 | 10:04 PM
  #9  
SINISTER's Avatar
SINISTER
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,284
From: Miami, FL
Default RE: 2010 Mustang

ORIGINAL: Sarge_13

ORIGINAL: SINISTER

My thoughts: You think you're funny.

I find it hard to believe Ford would put that in a production car. They never appear to be all that concerned with performance.
Ford GT or almost anything to pass through SVT ring any bells to you? Guess not...
That's all well & good, but those are limited (relative) production run cars. Not the droves of Mustang GT's and V6's that you see on the road. Know what I mean.
Old May 1, 2008 | 10:07 PM
  #10  
SINISTER's Avatar
SINISTER
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,284
From: Miami, FL
Default RE: 2010 Mustang

ORIGINAL: The Stig

ORIGINAL: Sarge_13

Link to article or ban.
ORIGINAL: SINISTER

My thoughts: You think you're funny.
lmao, so much for my credibility. Anyway, I took some pics of the magazine for you guys. You cant read the article becuase its too small, but you can clearly see on the cover "6.2-LITER 400-HP V-8"
I stand corrected. But I was really aiming for scarcasm, guess I should have put in one of these: [8D]



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:01 AM.