Street/Strip Raced a guy from a light? Had that ride of yours on the timed track? Tell your story here.

G37

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 25, 2010 | 01:20 AM
  #41  
The_Third_Horseman's Avatar
The_Third_Horseman
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 288
From:
Default

This is the logic behind it, if Im understanding correctly. My RPM's in 3rd going 70 are about 4750. If Im going 70 on the highway for example, in 5th gear, and my RPM's are at say 2500, and a car pulls alongside wanting to run. If I push in the clutch, my RPM's drop to idle. I then put it into 3rd, then when I release the clutch and hit the gas, I have to wait for my RPM's to go all the way from idle to 4750 before I will accelerate once I let out. But, if I push in the clutch, put it into 3rd, rev to about 4750 and let out on the clutch while applying sufficient pressure to the gas pedal, I wont have to wait for the RPM increase, it will just hit and take off like hell. Think Ive actually spun the tires a bit at that speed doing it like that before. So I think it kinda makes a difference.

Thats if I understand it right.

Last edited by The_Third_Horseman; Mar 25, 2010 at 01:22 AM.
Old Mar 25, 2010 | 06:08 AM
  #42  
nd22121's Avatar
nd22121
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 175
From: Pennsylvania
Default

Ok. Yeah that makes sense.
Old Mar 25, 2010 | 01:04 PM
  #43  
ski's Avatar
ski
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,470
From:
Default

The primary reasons for rev matching when d/s a manual tranny at high speeds is to get the pressure plate spinning at approx. the same rpm as the clutch disk in order to prevent excessive wear on these 2 components when they make contact, and to reduce the shock load on all of the driveline components when the clutch pedal is released.
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 06:04 AM
  #44  
nd22121's Avatar
nd22121
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 175
From: Pennsylvania
Default

Yea so that works pretty well. I was trying it at a slower speed. I need to practice a lot more but a few tmes I got it just right and the car lurched forward. The tires even lost traction for a second.
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 11:35 AM
  #45  
ski's Avatar
ski
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,470
From:
Default

Glad to hear that it worked.
FWIW, you can create a 3rd gear reference sheet that shows which rpm to rev the engine to for different speeds. For instance, with 4.10 gears and stock tires your car's engine will rev at approx. 3800 at 50, 4200 at 55, 4600 at 60, 5000 at 65, and 5400 at 70.

BTW, if you don't mind my asking, where in Pa. do you live?

Last edited by ski; Mar 26, 2010 at 11:38 AM.
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 01:00 PM
  #46  
Cusp's Avatar
Cusp
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 277
From: California
Default

I liked the G37 Coupe a lot. But not the 15,000 worth of difference in the price of my GT. I paid 21K for a new GT because of Ford cash incentives and dealer's willingness to let it go for invoice. G37s were pushing 35 - 40K. The Mustang is an american icon and is faster than the vast majority of cars on the road. But there are some faster. BTW, I bet you can take a G37 from the dig for a while. Rolling is clearly their game with their better aerodynamics and 330 HP. 410s didn't help you on the roll either. 4th was to low and 5th to high.
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 04:01 PM
  #47  
ski's Avatar
ski
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,470
From:
Default

Originally Posted by Cusp
4th was to low and 5th to high.
4th was also too high. 3rd would have given the OP's GT faster acceleration.
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 05:18 PM
  #48  
nd22121's Avatar
nd22121
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 175
From: Pennsylvania
Default

Originally Posted by ski
Glad to hear that it worked.
FWIW, you can create a 3rd gear reference sheet that shows which rpm to rev the engine to for different speeds. For instance, with 4.10 gears and stock tires your car's engine will rev at approx. 3800 at 50, 4200 at 55, 4600 at 60, 5000 at 65, and 5400 at 70.

BTW, if you don't mind my asking, where in Pa. do you live?
Thanks.
I live in Lancaster
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 05:22 PM
  #49  
nd22121's Avatar
nd22121
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 175
From: Pennsylvania
Default

Originally Posted by Cusp
I liked the G37 Coupe a lot. But not the 15,000 worth of difference in the price of my GT. I paid 21K for a new GT because of Ford cash incentives and dealer's willingness to let it go for invoice. G37s were pushing 35 - 40K. The Mustang is an american icon and is faster than the vast majority of cars on the road. But there are some faster. BTW, I bet you can take a G37 from the dig for a while. Rolling is clearly their game with their better aerodynamics and 330 HP. 410s didn't help you on the roll either. 4th was to low and 5th to high.
I agree. One of the reasons I got the car. Really wanted an evo xviii or xix but couldn't really afford even a used one with my school loans. Saw the gt for a good price, low miles. Figured over time I could save and slowly build it up to hang and surpass the evo. Not that I really plan on racing one. Only for the thrill of the power.
Old Mar 27, 2010 | 11:09 AM
  #50  
ski's Avatar
ski
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,470
From:
Default

Originally Posted by nd22121
I live in Lancaster
Just curious. I'm in NE Pa.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32 AM.