05 RSX-S vs. 03 GT
12-10-2005, 07:24 PM
#54
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12,575
RE: 05 RSX-S vs. 03 GT
ORIGINAL: HC_CrAzYHoRsE
who said that ? stock for stock an srt-4 is usually .1 to .3 quicker than a 99-04 gt
ORIGINAL: OICW
Since everyone here feels a pre-05 GT can beat an SRT-4, then I guess an RSX would be no more challenging than a tri-cycle.
Since everyone here feels a pre-05 GT can beat an SRT-4, then I guess an RSX would be no more challenging than a tri-cycle.
The RSX is a joke. Seriously, a stock auto vert GT with a set of 15s in the back would still embarass the hell outta one.
12-10-2005, 07:30 PM
#55
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12,575
RE: 05 RSX-S vs. 03 GT
ORIGINAL: 72MachOne99GT
14 flat with a decent driver, consistently
a 99-04 take a proffessional to hit a 14.1, and thats rare.
and from a roll, dont even think about it, we'd get walked like we were racing a ls1 or 2
is it the cobalt that is fast?
a 99-04 take a proffessional to hit a 14.1, and thats rare.
and from a roll, dont even think about it, we'd get walked like we were racing a ls1 or 2
I have seen plenty of "non proffessional" drivers run 14.0s and even 13.9s with bone stock 99+ GTs.
And a cobalt SS isn't gonna run a 14.0 stock, even with john force at the wheel.
12-12-2005, 03:56 AM
#57
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 14
RE: 05 RSX-S vs. 03 GT
I have a little more respect after I raced my buddies s2000, he had video of an rsx racing him and they stay door to door, In a race against the s2k I also stayed side by side the whole way from 60-125, I have an 03 GT with BBK cai and pulleys, Flomaster American Thunder catback and 3.73 gears in back. this is a link to the s2k vs. rsx forum and a link to the video below it. the rsx only had an open race header
http://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=343838
www.roadconetuning.com/leythadam.wmv
I will post the vid of GT vs s2k race shortly
http://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=343838
www.roadconetuning.com/leythadam.wmv
I will post the vid of GT vs s2k race shortly
12-12-2005, 05:35 PM
#59
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location:
Posts: 527
RE: 05 RSX-S vs. 03 GT
I bought my Cobalt SS because I figured tht aftermarket would be nice for a S/C car.
The GM stages kits will turn thes cars into a decently fast car, but where are the GM kits?
Simply put though running low 14's in a S/C 2.0 is impressive.
The GM stages kits will turn thes cars into a decently fast car, but where are the GM kits?
Simply put though running low 14's in a S/C 2.0 is impressive.
12-12-2005, 05:39 PM
#60
Gentleman's Relish
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 13,098
RE: 05 RSX-S vs. 03 GT
ORIGINAL: codyss
I bought my Cobalt SS because I figured tht aftermarket would be nice for a S/C car.
The GM stages kits will turn thes cars into a decently fast car, but where are the GM kits?
Simply put though running low 14's in a S/C 2.0 is impressive.
I bought my Cobalt SS because I figured tht aftermarket would be nice for a S/C car.
The GM stages kits will turn thes cars into a decently fast car, but where are the GM kits?
Simply put though running low 14's in a S/C 2.0 is impressive.
Okay, there's a comment I can actually somewhat agree with you on. 4 banger with a S/C for the price is pretty good (I wouldn't go so far as impressive). Impressive would be factory car does mid-high 13's at the current price range. I'm sure that will eventually be a reality..