ok you win..

 

My magazine has nucular warheads to blow your magazine up with.

 

Must have been a 2006 SS 2.4 VVT they run low 15's with ease.

And if it was a SS/SC the driver sucked *****. From a roll a 300C would be no problem, as for SRT-8's thats a different story.

 

ok buddy..

 

Shut up... 300C > SS 2.0 S/C with ease.

 

Those are just the stats that I found, like I said I also drove a Cobalt SS, they're no slouch whatsoever... In my opinion just a step slower then the Srt-4 which has gained a lot of respect from a lot of Mustang communities. You're right everyone drives differant, I would hope that driving 2 cars within 2-3 days would be almost the same with the only change due to weather. Most of you comment on cars you've never drove. I had a 2005 V6 Mustang which ran low 15's stock, and the Cobalt was much faster. Alike horsepower and close on torque, with the cobalt about 500lbs lighter. Are you goin to tell me that the Cobalt runs the same as a V6 Stang? C'mon guys..

 

Told you he was coming

 

The 300C traps at 100+, the Cobalt SS does not.

 

You're a dumbass, at higher speeds the higher HP car would have the advantage. The faster you go the less weight factors in, the more hp matters.

 

buy an ls1 again or something. you're defending the cavalier on the wrong forum.