95 V6 vs. Integra
6th Gear Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,828
From: Clarksville TN
RE: 95 V6 vs. Integra
ORIGINAL: 2000Si
A 95 V6 and a base model integra (RS/GS/LS) are both 16-17 second cars.
If he pulled on a slow *** car with his slow *** car, the Teggy either let off or hit the governor.
He was doing 100 keeping with this 95 V6 and then suddenly made a right turn because 'he lost and knew it'. wtf?
Don't even get me started on pulling 100 mph on city streets...
A 95 V6 and a base model integra (RS/GS/LS) are both 16-17 second cars.
If he pulled on a slow *** car with his slow *** car, the Teggy either let off or hit the governor.
He was doing 100 keeping with this 95 V6 and then suddenly made a right turn because 'he lost and knew it'. wtf?
Don't even get me started on pulling 100 mph on city streets...
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 119
From: Fresno, CA
RE: 95 V6 vs. Integra
Thats a loss I hate to say. but on the bright side he was a HELL of a good driver to be yanking what I assume was a 100 mph 90 degree turn.
2000si I know youre in to autoX and Handling over straight line accel what do you think about a 100 mph right hand turn Im think either that was an inaccurate description OR BS
just a thought to all the car guys here: please don't risk a 100 mph crash or racing ticket on city streets where there could be cross traffic, if you havent won by 60 you lost.
2000si I know youre in to autoX and Handling over straight line accel what do you think about a 100 mph right hand turn Im think either that was an inaccurate description OR BS
just a thought to all the car guys here: please don't risk a 100 mph crash or racing ticket on city streets where there could be cross traffic, if you havent won by 60 you lost.
6th Gear Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,828
From: Clarksville TN
RE: 95 V6 vs. Integra
ORIGINAL: wayleft
Thats a loss I hate to say. but on the bright side he was a HELL of a good driver to be yanking what I assume was a 100 mph 90 degree turn.
2000si I know youre in to autoX and Handling over straight line accel what do you think about a 100 mph right hand turn Im think either that was an inaccurate description OR BS
just a thought to all the car guys here: please don't risk a 100 mph crash or racing ticket on city streets where there could be cross traffic, if you havent won by 60 you lost.
Thats a loss I hate to say. but on the bright side he was a HELL of a good driver to be yanking what I assume was a 100 mph 90 degree turn.
2000si I know youre in to autoX and Handling over straight line accel what do you think about a 100 mph right hand turn Im think either that was an inaccurate description OR BS
just a thought to all the car guys here: please don't risk a 100 mph crash or racing ticket on city streets where there could be cross traffic, if you havent won by 60 you lost.
Guest
Posts: n/a
RE: 95 V6 vs. Integra
ORIGINAL: 01SilverGT
I didnt know the LS/GS/RS all ran about the same times. I thought The LS was faster than the GS and RS and the GSR was faster than the LS and the Type-R was faster than the GSR? I guess you learn something new everyday.
ORIGINAL: 2000Si
A 95 V6 and a base model integra (RS/GS/LS) are both 16-17 second cars.
If he pulled on a slow *** car with his slow *** car, the Teggy either let off or hit the governor.
He was doing 100 keeping with this 95 V6 and then suddenly made a right turn because 'he lost and knew it'. wtf?
Don't even get me started on pulling 100 mph on city streets...
A 95 V6 and a base model integra (RS/GS/LS) are both 16-17 second cars.
If he pulled on a slow *** car with his slow *** car, the Teggy either let off or hit the governor.
He was doing 100 keeping with this 95 V6 and then suddenly made a right turn because 'he lost and knew it'. wtf?
Don't even get me started on pulling 100 mph on city streets...
LS/RS/GS - 16-17 second cars
GSR - very high 14 to very low 15 stock
ITR - mid to high 14s to low 15s stock
I think this entire story is a waste of bandwidth, to put it bluntly.
6th Gear Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,828
From: Clarksville TN
RE: 95 V6 vs. Integra
ORIGINAL: 2000Si
The 94-01 LS/RS/GS all have the same engine in it. All are rated at 140 hp. The LS is actually slowest of the bunch because it's the 'luxury' model base teggy, more options = more weight... basically.
LS/RS/GS - 16-17 second cars
GSR - very high 14 to very low 15 stock
ITR - mid to high 14s to low 15s stock
I think this entire story is a waste of bandwidth, to put it bluntly.
ORIGINAL: 01SilverGT
I didnt know the LS/GS/RS all ran about the same times. I thought The LS was faster than the GS and RS and the GSR was faster than the LS and the Type-R was faster than the GSR? I guess you learn something new everyday.
ORIGINAL: 2000Si
A 95 V6 and a base model integra (RS/GS/LS) are both 16-17 second cars.
If he pulled on a slow *** car with his slow *** car, the Teggy either let off or hit the governor.
He was doing 100 keeping with this 95 V6 and then suddenly made a right turn because 'he lost and knew it'. wtf?
Don't even get me started on pulling 100 mph on city streets...
A 95 V6 and a base model integra (RS/GS/LS) are both 16-17 second cars.
If he pulled on a slow *** car with his slow *** car, the Teggy either let off or hit the governor.
He was doing 100 keeping with this 95 V6 and then suddenly made a right turn because 'he lost and knew it'. wtf?
Don't even get me started on pulling 100 mph on city streets...
LS/RS/GS - 16-17 second cars
GSR - very high 14 to very low 15 stock
ITR - mid to high 14s to low 15s stock
I think this entire story is a waste of bandwidth, to put it bluntly.
Guest
Posts: n/a
RE: 95 V6 vs. Integra
The GSR sounds about right. My car is rated at 7.1-7.2 for 0-60 times as well... The LS/RS/GS do have a better power band, more torquey downlow, that 0-60 time is plausible, but once the GSR gets into the upper power band it has shorter gearing and 30 extra horses to play with.
6th Gear Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,828
From: Clarksville TN
RE: 95 V6 vs. Integra
ORIGINAL: 2000Si
The GSR sounds about right. My car is rated at 7.1-7.2 for 0-60 times as well... The LS/RS/GS do have a better power band, more torquey downlow, that 0-60 time is plausible, but once the GSR gets into the upper power band it has shorter gearing and 30 extra horses to play with.
The GSR sounds about right. My car is rated at 7.1-7.2 for 0-60 times as well... The LS/RS/GS do have a better power band, more torquey downlow, that 0-60 time is plausible, but once the GSR gets into the upper power band it has shorter gearing and 30 extra horses to play with.
6th Gear Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,828
From: Clarksville TN
RE: 95 V6 vs. Integra
ORIGINAL: 2000Si
The GSR sounds about right. My car is rated at 7.1-7.2 for 0-60 times as well... The LS/RS/GS do have a better power band, more torquey downlow, that 0-60 time is plausible, but once the GSR gets into the upper power band it has shorter gearing and 30 extra horses to play with.
The GSR sounds about right. My car is rated at 7.1-7.2 for 0-60 times as well... The LS/RS/GS do have a better power band, more torquey downlow, that 0-60 time is plausible, but once the GSR gets into the upper power band it has shorter gearing and 30 extra horses to play with.
6th Gear Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,828
From: Clarksville TN
RE: 95 V6 vs. Integra
ORIGINAL: 2000Si
I've never heard of that site, honestly. I believe the GTS times... never raced one, and I honestly don't ever want to. Those ****ers are too quick for my car.
I've never heard of that site, honestly. I believe the GTS times... never raced one, and I honestly don't ever want to. Those ****ers are too quick for my car.