SVT Forums

which engine is a better building block?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 8, 2009 | 11:19 PM
  #21  
P.S.I.cho's Avatar
P.S.I.cho
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,123
From:
Default

run the teksid but be careful u have a smaller cubic inch motor, it has its limits, in track only car with a turbo setup for YSI/F1 procharger youll be pushing the limits of these smaller motors even with the right precautions, a couple minor hiccups and you'll be splitting her open. what kinda power you lookin at?
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 02:08 PM
  #22  
mfj's Avatar
mfj
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,463
From: AZ
Default

Originally Posted by P.S.I.cho
run the teksid but be careful u have a smaller cubic inch motor, it has its limits, in track only car with a turbo setup for YSI/F1 procharger youll be pushing the limits of these smaller motors even with the right precautions, a couple minor hiccups and you'll be splitting her open. what kinda power you lookin at?
That is correct. When making big power, with relatively small cubes, you must be very careful. NEVER hot lap your car. My car gets at least a 20 min. cool down period between each run, as longevity is important to me, especially with the kind of boost that I am running.

Be smart...
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 05:54 PM
  #23  
Smokin04's Avatar
Smokin04
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 314
From: Near China now...
Default

Don't forget the aluminum expands under heat too. The difference is in the setup. Aluminum can (and should) be built tighter to compensate for the heat expansion, so aluminum due to its nature is actually more forgiving under heat as long as you keep it there. I'm not saying that too much for too long won't kill it, extreme situations can kill ANY motor, but if it's built for it, it can take it. I should've probably read the 10-12 posts prior to this, I really don't know where this thread has been.
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 06:04 PM
  #24  
Smokin04's Avatar
Smokin04
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 314
From: Near China now...
Default

After reading...

The aluminator block might be better for your application. It's just as good as the Teksid and cheaper (in some cases) as well. They come ready to go, unlinke the Teksid which will need machining. The big daddy of course is the SHM race block...but after machining you're looking at a 5800 dollar price tag. The next in the pecking order is the iron Boss 5.0 Modular. Really stout caps and mains. Lots of material, yadda yadda...a little pricier still, but you will save money by only having to build one. The MMR race block is up there too, but can be had after machining for about the same as the SHM block, but you get the cubes out of the MMR block.

But +1 on what the guys are saying, without knowing your power level goals and for what purpose you're building the engine, it's like trying to pour a beer in the dark.
Old Jul 11, 2009 | 01:34 AM
  #25  
Fobra's Avatar
Fobra
Banned
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 4,064
From:
Default

your best bet is the old iron 2v block. The teksid has no real advantage other than weight. Aluminum blocks can be repaired, but lets face it... your not going to repair it, even if it breaks. The weight saving is minimal in comparison to the cost. If you were going to do a mid power car, and track race it then Id be all for the teksid... but in reality its just going to be a bragging point... and as others have mentioned hot lapping is a concern, also aluminum blocks have special considerations in high hp drag racing due to the processes used to strengthen the block (it basically weakens over repeated extreme heat cycles)... IMO either one would be just fine, but the teksid is not necessary and the iron block should save you some coin, both in initial cost and labor
Old Jul 11, 2009 | 11:24 AM
  #26  
mfj's Avatar
mfj
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,463
From: AZ
Default

I built a regular terminator iron block. They have been proven to withstand over 1100 rwhp... Can't go wrong with the Termy block.
Old Jul 11, 2009 | 03:19 PM
  #27  
P.S.I.cho's Avatar
P.S.I.cho
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,123
From:
Default

Originally Posted by mfj
I built a regular terminator iron block. They have been proven to withstand over 1100 rwhp... Can't go wrong with the Termy block.
yup the guy who tunes my car has one non stroker at 1155 rwhp, how ever it did last 2 seasons it eventually took its toll and broke not only did it break it broke open a water jacket and hydo locked the motor...no replacement for displacement comes into play when your putting down big power and looking for dependability.
Old Jul 12, 2009 | 10:29 PM
  #28  
Fobra's Avatar
Fobra
Banned
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 4,064
From:
Default

+1 ... but some people would rather believe internet BS
Old Jul 13, 2009 | 09:27 AM
  #29  
kweb288's Avatar
kweb288
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,736
From: St. Charles Il, and ISU
Default

havnt read this thread for quite a while been back over in the 5.0 section talking to the guys, and after strippin the car down to .... pretty much nothing, i have decided that i am probably going to be going with a termi swap (just keep it stock with a pulley or something till i get used to it)
Attached Thumbnails which engine is a better building block?-2009-07-06-engine-teardown-016.jpg   which engine is a better building block?-2009-07-06-engine-teardown-018.jpg   which engine is a better building block?-2009-07-06-engine-teardown-021.jpg  
Old Jul 13, 2009 | 04:14 PM
  #30  
Smokin04's Avatar
Smokin04
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 314
From: Near China now...
Default

God I hate that word "termi"...it sounds so girly. Definitely not a word to describe a 400horse motor...just my opinion.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:40 AM.