New Stingray. LT1?????
#1
6th Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: MO/ Born and raised in Louisiana
Posts: 10,696
New Stingray. LT1?????
Reading up on the new Stingray and was very surpised to see that it will be equipped with a 6.2L LT1 engine pushing over 450 horsepower. Manufactured claims of 0-60 (I know who cares) in 4 secs and a low 12 in the quarter. Just wondering why did Chevy put the boosted up LT1 in the Stingray and not a LS engine?
#3
Just saw rwhp numbers at just over 400 stock. Going to be a strong running car... torque curve is ridiculous as well.
No boost (not sure what you meant there...) just the next revision of the GM pushrod. I think the name is dumb but then again I don't agree with a lot of what GM does anymore. That rear end....ugh
No boost (not sure what you meant there...) just the next revision of the GM pushrod. I think the name is dumb but then again I don't agree with a lot of what GM does anymore. That rear end....ugh
#4
Yeah when you look at the lt1 heads vs Ls heads they're very similar mostly. Except for obvious locations if direct injection injectors and the sort. We've already got a cnc head program in the works and should have ours somewhat soon.
#6
The car looks good in person. It looks more like a sports/exotic car than a Corvette. It's not unusual to see them driving around here in south eastern Michigan (I'm guessing per-production units).
IIRC they have 7 speed manuals and whatever speed autos, so I'm guessing they will be a flat 12 second car stock with a higher mph good for high 11's.
IIRC they have 7 speed manuals and whatever speed autos, so I'm guessing they will be a flat 12 second car stock with a higher mph good for high 11's.
#7
7 speeds for both, and I'm with ya stone, the rears are *** ugly. Like 99GT said I see them weekly around the area, and I dont know what the hell they were thinking with the back of that thing. side and front aren't bad but a c6z looks 10000000X'S better all around. Should be a good runner tho, guess only time will tell.
#9
7 speeds for both, and I'm with ya stone, the rears are *** ugly. Like 99GT said I see them weekly around the area, and I dont know what the hell they were thinking with the back of that thing. side and front aren't bad but a c6z looks 10000000X'S better all around. Should be a good runner tho, guess only time will tell.