V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs Technical discussions on the 3.8L and 3.9L V6 torque monsters

side exhaust?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 30, 2006 | 08:06 PM
  #11  
Twister's Avatar
Twister
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,645
From: So-Cal
Default RE: side exhaust?


ORIGINAL: cobra232


ORIGINAL: Twister

duel exhaust on a stock V6 (3.8) will produce less hp and torque due to not enough backpreasure. Add the extra bends of a side exhaust kit, and you will reduce the flow....
you want Zero backpressure in an exhaust.

backpressure does nothing but make the engine work to breath which takes HP to do.

why do people think backpressure is good is beyond me
what are you smoking? you can loose power and torque from not enough backpreasure! I have seen dyno sheets that proves that you can loose torque and horsepower by running duels on a stock 3.8.

Even Flowmaster says the same http://www.flowmastermufflers.com/backpressure.html
Old Jul 30, 2006 | 08:09 PM
  #12  
deezelnut's Avatar
deezelnut
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,618
From:
Default RE: side exhaust?

ORIGINAL: Twister


ORIGINAL: cobra232


ORIGINAL: Twister

duel exhaust on a stock V6 (3.8) will produce less hp and torque due to not enough backpreasure. Add the extra bends of a side exhaust kit, and you will reduce the flow....
you want Zero backpressure in an exhaust.

backpressure does nothing but make the engine work to breath which takes HP to do.

why do people think backpressure is good is beyond me
what are you smoking? you can loose power and torque from not enough backpreasure! I have seen dyno sheets that proves that you can loose torque and horsepower by running duels on a stock 3.8.

Even Flowmaster says the same http://www.flowmastermufflers.com/backpressure.html
you mean slowmaster.

why do you think race cars don't have mufflers? are people really this retarded


[IMG]local://upfiles/42520/8D08EF4251DE44F69D952CD04DEA163D.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]local://upfiles/42520/180590D0C0D9413CB5FD4F671F68B57D.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]local://upfiles/42520/6F90034317274A05B746D1B747DDF41D.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]local://upfiles/42520/64CB484BAD134013B49256C7A9C630BC.jpg[/IMG]
Old Jul 30, 2006 | 08:13 PM
  #13  
MyStangStanks's Avatar
MyStangStanks
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 293
From:
Default RE: side exhaust?


ORIGINAL: deezelnut

ORIGINAL: Twister


ORIGINAL: cobra232


ORIGINAL: Twister

duel exhaust on a stock V6 (3.8) will produce less hp and torque due to not enough backpreasure. Add the extra bends of a side exhaust kit, and you will reduce the flow....
you want Zero backpressure in an exhaust.

backpressure does nothing but make the engine work to breath which takes HP to do.

why do people think backpressure is good is beyond me
what are you smoking? you can loose power and torque from not enough backpreasure! I have seen dyno sheets that proves that you can loose torque and horsepower by running duels on a stock 3.8.

Even Flowmaster says the same http://www.flowmastermufflers.com/backpressure.html
you mean slowmaster.

why do you think race cars don't have mufflers? are people really this retarded


[IMG]local://upfiles/42520/8D08EF4251DE44F69D952CD04DEA163D.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]local://upfiles/42520/180590D0C0D9413CB5FD4F671F68B57D.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]local://upfiles/42520/6F90034317274A05B746D1B747DDF41D.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]local://upfiles/42520/64CB484BAD134013B49256C7A9C630BC.jpg[/IMG]
lol OMG that's comedy! I don't have anything to say about backpressure or anything, I'm just reading and hoping to find out which one is the truth. I do hear about how not having backpressure causes strai on the valves or something. Pretty much that it's bad for the engine. True or False??
Old Jul 30, 2006 | 08:15 PM
  #14  
Twister's Avatar
Twister
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,645
From: So-Cal
Default RE: side exhaust?


ORIGINAL: deezelnut

ORIGINAL: Twister


ORIGINAL: cobra232


ORIGINAL: Twister

duel exhaust on a stock V6 (3.8) will produce less hp and torque due to not enough backpreasure. Add the extra bends of a side exhaust kit, and you will reduce the flow....
you want Zero backpressure in an exhaust.

backpressure does nothing but make the engine work to breath which takes HP to do.

why do people think backpressure is good is beyond me
what are you smoking? you can loose power and torque from not enough backpreasure! I have seen dyno sheets that proves that you can loose torque and horsepower by running duels on a stock 3.8.

Even Flowmaster says the same http://www.flowmastermufflers.com/backpressure.html
you mean slowmaster.

why do you think race cars don't have mufflers? are people really this retarded


[IMG]local://upfiles/42520/8D08EF4251DE44F69D952CD04DEA163D.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]local://upfiles/42520/180590D0C0D9413CB5FD4F671F68B57D.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]local://upfiles/42520/6F90034317274A05B746D1B747DDF41D.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]local://upfiles/42520/64CB484BAD134013B49256C7A9C630BC.jpg[/IMG]
dood, how many cars have you built? you are talking out of your *** and you don't even realize it. Bigger is not always better, ask any guy that runs a carb about that. Thinking that backpreasure is not an important thing is a ricer thought.
Old Jul 30, 2006 | 08:24 PM
  #15  
amrcnidyot's Avatar
amrcnidyot
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,373
From: Wichita, Ks
Default RE: side exhaust?

you can screw ur power up w/o enough backpressure for certain engines. the race cars are puttin out a ton of power and they are pushing out a LOT of exhaust. i did know exactly why all this is a while back but i forgot why its bad. but i know that you do need a certain amount of back pressure.

and here is a side exit exhaust from steeda at mustangtuning
Old Jul 30, 2006 | 08:29 PM
  #16  
deezelnut's Avatar
deezelnut
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,618
From:
Default RE: side exhaust?


ORIGINAL: Twister


ORIGINAL: deezelnut

ORIGINAL: Twister


ORIGINAL: cobra232


ORIGINAL: Twister

duel exhaust on a stock V6 (3.8) will produce less hp and torque due to not enough backpreasure. Add the extra bends of a side exhaust kit, and you will reduce the flow....
you want Zero backpressure in an exhaust.

backpressure does nothing but make the engine work to breath which takes HP to do.

why do people think backpressure is good is beyond me
what are you smoking? you can loose power and torque from not enough backpreasure! I have seen dyno sheets that proves that you can loose torque and horsepower by running duels on a stock 3.8.

Even Flowmaster says the same http://www.flowmastermufflers.com/backpressure.html
you mean slowmaster.

why do you think race cars don't have mufflers? are people really this retarded


[IMG]local://upfiles/42520/8D08EF4251DE44F69D952CD04DEA163D.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]local://upfiles/42520/180590D0C0D9413CB5FD4F671F68B57D.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]local://upfiles/42520/6F90034317274A05B746D1B747DDF41D.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]local://upfiles/42520/64CB484BAD134013B49256C7A9C630BC.jpg[/IMG]
dood, how many cars have you built? you are talking out of your *** and you don't even realize it. Bigger is not always better, ask any guy that runs a carb about that. Thinking that backpreasure is not an important thing is a ricer thought.
it's on now
let's see, 1970 Cougar Eliminator. 351C 13.5:1 compression. 4" exhaust, carbed. can't remember exact numbers, it was like 500+ rwhp. 1980 Rabbit truck. 22.2:1 compression, 42 lbs of boost. 4' exhaust. 1973 charger. 426 hemi. 4' exhaust. 625 something rwhp. but since those probably don't count. here's this


1976 TA. 515 CI SD bored .030 over, dual holley 750 dumpers and twin turbos. 1300 rwhp. i helped on that one. 5' exhaust. none of these cars had mufflers. so i will say it again.



[IMG]local://upfiles/42520/6CFF89B1A9D84C21A617F822889BDB80.jpg[/IMG]
Old Jul 30, 2006 | 08:39 PM
  #17  
Twister's Avatar
Twister
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,645
From: So-Cal
Default RE: side exhaust?


ORIGINAL: deezelnut

it's on now
let's see, 1970 Cougar Eliminator. 351C 13.5:1 compression. 4" exhaust, carbed. can't remember exact numbers, it was like 500+ rwhp. 1980 Rabbit truck. 22.2:1 compression, 42 lbs of boost. 4' exhaust. 1973 charger. 426 hemi. 4' exhaust. 625 something rwhp. but since those probably don't count. here's this


1976 TA. 515 CI SD bored .030 over, dual holley 750 dumpers and twin turbos. 1300 rwhp. i helped on that one. 5' exhaust. none of these cars had mufflers. so i will say it again.


there is a HUGE difference between a Hemi or a twin turbo 515 and a stock or near stock 3.8. You are talking about cars that never run below 5000 rpm, I am talking about street cars. The fastest way to make yourself look like an idiot is to open your mouth and attack someone when you really do not know what you are talking about.

http://www.pypesexhaust.com/faq.html
Q: Should I base my muffler choice on the highest flow rating?
A: Not always. In dyno tests higher horsepower cars (400+) almost always benefit from maximum flow. Lower horsepower cars (300-) can actually lose some low end torque and peak horsepower by using maximum flow mufflers.
Q: It seems as though 3" exhaust is the popular choice these days. Is there any disadvantages?
A: Yes! A stock horsepower car with 3" exhaust can lose noticeable low end torque and affect performance. Also, 3" pipe usually requires increased installation precision because of limited clearance issues. As a general rule, cars with less then 450hp should use 2.5" exhaust. Cars in the 450hp range could potentially benefit by a 3" crossover and still keeping 2.5" tails. Cars with 500hp + should utilize 3" or even larger tube size
Old Jul 30, 2006 | 08:42 PM
  #18  
BeachStang04's Avatar
BeachStang04
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,447
From:
Default RE: side exhaust?

dude twisters right man. You will loose low end torque but also gain some in the highend, if you do not have enough backpressure you will loose horsepower thats why it is recommened to go with 2.5 unless your going f/i or having some heavy internal work done.
Old Jul 30, 2006 | 08:42 PM
  #19  
MyStangStanks's Avatar
MyStangStanks
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 293
From:
Default RE: side exhaust?

it's on now
let's see, 1970 Cougar Eliminator. 351C 13.5:1 compression. 4" exhaust, carbed. can't remember exact numbers, it was like 500+ rwhp. 1980 Rabbit truck. 22.2:1 compression, 42 lbs of boost. 4' exhaust. 1973 charger. 426 hemi. 4' exhaust. 625 something rwhp. but since those probably don't count. here's this


1976 TA. 515 CI SD bored .030 over, dual holley 750 dumpers and twin turbos. 1300 rwhp. i helped on that one. 5' exhaust. none of these cars had mufflers. so i will say it again.
Holy s**t!! That's a hige a$$ exhaust! Then again, it's needed for the HP numbers and the twin turbos...That's insane.
Old Jul 30, 2006 | 08:43 PM
  #20  
deezelnut's Avatar
deezelnut
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,618
From:
Default RE: side exhaust?


ORIGINAL: Twister


ORIGINAL: deezelnut

it's on now
let's see, 1970 Cougar Eliminator. 351C 13.5:1 compression. 4" exhaust, carbed. can't remember exact numbers, it was like 500+ rwhp. 1980 Rabbit truck. 22.2:1 compression, 42 lbs of boost. 4' exhaust. 1973 charger. 426 hemi. 4' exhaust. 625 something rwhp. but since those probably don't count. here's this


1976 TA. 515 CI SD bored .030 over, dual holley 750 dumpers and twin turbos. 1300 rwhp. i helped on that one. 5' exhaust. none of these cars had mufflers. so i will say it again.


there is a HUGE difference between a Hemi or a twin turbo 515 and a stock or near stock 3.8. You are talking about cars that never run below 5000 rpm, I am talking about street cars. The fastest way to make yourself look like an idiot is to open your mouth and attack someone when you really do not know what you are talking about.

http://www.pypesexhaust.com/faq.html
Q: Should I base my muffler choice on the highest flow rating?
A: Not always. In dyno tests higher horsepower cars (400+) almost always benefit from maximum flow. Lower horsepower cars (300-) can actually lose some low end torque and peak horsepower by using maximum flow mufflers.
Q: It seems as though 3" exhaust is the popular choice these days. Is there any disadvantages?
A: Yes! A stock horsepower car with 3" exhaust can lose noticeable low end torque and affect performance. Also, 3" pipe usually requires increased installation precision because of limited clearance issues. As a general rule, cars with less then 450hp should use 2.5" exhaust. Cars in the 450hp range could potentially benefit by a 3" crossover and still keeping 2.5" tails. Cars with 500hp + should utilize 3" or even larger tube size
that is why people rarely use 3'. if backpressure is so good. then wy do the new GTs come wth 2.5' pipes. don't you think 2.25' would be good for more torque



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:02 AM.