Mustang vs. Celica & 5.0
10-02-2006, 09:08 PM
#21
RE: Mustang vs. Celica & 5.0
I'm calling [sm=bs.gif]. 02 265 hp GT: 0-60 in approx. 5.4s, 1/4 13.8-14.6 > any 99-04 190 V6 0-60 in approx 7.4-8.8s, 1/4 in 15.6-16.2s yea, I really call BS
Foxbody 205-225 hp 5.0: 0-60 in approx 5.9-6.1s, 1/4 in 14.6-15.4s > any 99-04 190 V6 0-60 in approx 7.4-8.8s, 1/4 in 15.6-16.2s unless it was an auto or a sh*tty driver, you're screwed.
Foxbody 205-225 hp 5.0: 0-60 in approx 5.9-6.1s, 1/4 in 14.6-15.4s > any 99-04 190 V6 0-60 in approx 7.4-8.8s, 1/4 in 15.6-16.2s unless it was an auto or a sh*tty driver, you're screwed.
10-02-2006, 10:06 PM
#22
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Posts: 3,411
RE: Mustang vs. Celica & 5.0
ORIGINAL: jthorn9
I'm calling [sm=bs.gif]. 02 265 hp GT: 0-60 in approx. 5.4s, 1/4 13.8-14.6 > any 99-04 190 V6 0-60 in approx 7.4-8.8s, 1/4 in 15.6-16.2s yea, I really call BS
Foxbody 205-225 hp 5.0: 0-60 in approx 5.9-6.1s, 1/4 in 14.6-15.4s > any 99-04 190 V6 0-60 in approx 7.4-8.8s, 1/4 in 15.6-16.2s unless it was an auto or a sh*tty driver, you're screwed.
I'm calling [sm=bs.gif]. 02 265 hp GT: 0-60 in approx. 5.4s, 1/4 13.8-14.6 > any 99-04 190 V6 0-60 in approx 7.4-8.8s, 1/4 in 15.6-16.2s yea, I really call BS
Foxbody 205-225 hp 5.0: 0-60 in approx 5.9-6.1s, 1/4 in 14.6-15.4s > any 99-04 190 V6 0-60 in approx 7.4-8.8s, 1/4 in 15.6-16.2s unless it was an auto or a sh*tty driver, you're screwed.
10-02-2006, 10:08 PM
#23
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 4,951
RE: Mustang vs. Celica & 5.0
ORIGINAL: MUSTANG042004
you should beat a 5.0 unless its modded to hell cause i have and i dont care what anybody says cause i have, o yeah a 02 gt too
you should beat a 5.0 unless its modded to hell cause i have and i dont care what anybody says cause i have, o yeah a 02 gt too
....................................... .....Probably just me.[8D]
10-02-2006, 11:21 PM
#29
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location:
Posts: 2,926
RE: Mustang vs. Celica & 5.0
ORIGINAL: jthorn9
Celica is a toss up as your auto tranny is going to kill you. Now even if the 5.0 were an auto you'd have to get hell of a lot lucky to beat him as his car would have to either be raged out, or would just have to have a seriously crappy launch and you a superb launch to win. If he's a manual, you're screwed. Old foxbody 5.0 225hp>190hp Edge V6
Celica is a toss up as your auto tranny is going to kill you. Now even if the 5.0 were an auto you'd have to get hell of a lot lucky to beat him as his car would have to either be raged out, or would just have to have a seriously crappy launch and you a superb launch to win. If he's a manual, you're screwed. Old foxbody 5.0 225hp>190hp Edge V6
10-02-2006, 11:25 PM
#30
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: MA
Posts: 563
RE: Mustang vs. Celica & 5.0
I didn't race them yet but soon. My friend with the firebird raced the Celica sort-a and said that the Celica wasn't that fast.
The Firebirds racing the 02 GT soon, don't you hate when GT guys think their all that because they have 2 more cylinders than us. The firebirds gonna blown the GT away, hes gonna fuc*ing cry when he loses.
The Firebirds racing the 02 GT soon, don't you hate when GT guys think their all that because they have 2 more cylinders than us. The firebirds gonna blown the GT away, hes gonna fuc*ing cry when he loses.