V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs Technical discussions on the 3.8L and 3.9L V6 torque monsters

4.2 liter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-14-2007, 01:18 AM
  #51  
aynjell
3rd Gear Member
 
aynjell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location:
Posts: 638
Default RE: 4.2 liter

Ah, okay. So if I got an even bigger crankshaft would I be able to further increase displacement without enlarging the cylinders? I plan on rebuilding an F150 engine (so my 3.8 can stay in my car and get me back and forth to work and serve as a backup engine when I blow this one or possibly get sold *shrug*) with whatever works out best. I don't know what is best now so I won't even plan, but from what I'm gathering forged internals is a good deal stronger and will help me reach a higher horsepower than stock, so that may be a good start. I'll also probably go with some of the same parts that I saw in that stroker kit, I think I remember seeing some polished stuff that was touted to improve performance. Iono, I'll figure it out as I go, but for now, it's rebuild the assend of my car first, cut the exhaust off after the cats (and weld the some downpointing tips on) and possibly get a tuner... and then done look for the donor engine.
aynjell is offline  
Old 01-14-2007, 01:58 AM
  #52  
cobra232
5th Gear Member
 
cobra232's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location:
Posts: 3,594
Default RE: 4.2 liter

ORIGINAL: flash20

what about the ecu? would my car have to be tuned again? and will my tuner still work?
your stock computer and tuner will be able to handle the 4.2L engine but a dyno tune would never be a bad idea. at the very worst if you have an SCT tuner Justin at vmptuning.com can modify your tuner to give more precise tuning needs if any are needed
cobra232 is offline  
Old 01-14-2007, 02:01 AM
  #53  
cobra232
5th Gear Member
 
cobra232's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location:
Posts: 3,594
Default RE: 4.2 liter

ORIGINAL: aynjell

So the cylinders need no machining whatsoever?
cylinder bores are exactly the same diameter at 3.81" for both 3.8 and 4.2 so machining isnot required but if you are going to rebuild the 4.2 while the 3.8 is still in the engine than i see no reason why you shouldn't bore it .030" over and get forged pistons and I-beam rods. this will freshin up the cylinder bores just incase you have a bad cylinder (which is doubtfull) and give you a few more cubes
cobra232 is offline  
Old 01-17-2007, 12:03 AM
  #54  
eye3.h8it
1st Gear Member
 
eye3.h8it's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location:
Posts: 59
Default RE: 4.2 liter

would 3.8 headers work on a 4.2?
eye3.h8it is offline  
Old 01-17-2007, 12:06 AM
  #55  
amrcnidyot
6th Gear Member
 
amrcnidyot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Wichita, Ks
Posts: 5,373
Default RE: 4.2 liter

ORIGINAL: eye3.h8it

would 3.8 headers work on a 4.2?
yea
amrcnidyot is offline  
Old 01-17-2007, 12:44 AM
  #56  
cisurfer
5th Gear Member
 
cisurfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 2,158
Default RE: 4.2 liter

ya knwo thje more i think abou thtis the more i wanna do it...find a old f150 engine from a yard....rebuild the internals with nice **** and switch it over and net alot better numbers
cisurfer is offline  
Old 01-17-2007, 01:09 AM
  #57  
scrump22
 
scrump22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 20
Default RE: 4.2 liter

This is a good 4.2L swap post check this out should tell you what you need to know.

http://www.3.8mustang.com/forum/showthread.php?t=92629
scrump22 is offline  
Old 01-17-2007, 02:07 PM
  #58  
eye3.h8it
1st Gear Member
 
eye3.h8it's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location:
Posts: 59
Default RE: 4.2 liter

so my '96 headers will fit my '01 4.2?
eye3.h8it is offline  
Old 01-17-2007, 02:21 PM
  #59  
ByPopularDemand
5th Gear Member
 
ByPopularDemand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UT
Posts: 4,766
Default RE: 4.2 liter

Yeah is the swap year dependant
ByPopularDemand is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Halina
Canada, Over Seas and Elsewhere
3
03-24-2005 05:23 AM
stockcar3
Archive - Want To Buy Ads
0
04-03-2004 09:56 PM
Quik
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
1
02-01-2004 07:46 PM
stangnoob
General Tech
0
01-22-2004 12:21 PM
WhiteHawk
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
0
06-25-2003 02:49 PM



Quick Reply: 4.2 liter



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:19 PM.