V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs Technical discussions on the 3.8L and 3.9L V6 torque monsters

5.0 swap...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 7, 2007 | 06:03 PM
  #41  
regarkecurb's Avatar
regarkecurb
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 7
Default RE: 5.0 swap...

well thought i'd come in to the v-6 section because i have a 6 now..wanted to get some opinions..my bad..didn't realize all of the v6 guys were against v8's...you can close this thread if you'd like since its nothing but argueing! lol
Old Jun 7, 2007 | 06:28 PM
  #42  
mustangman02232's Avatar
mustangman02232
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,865
From: Ludlow, Mass
Default RE: 5.0 swap...

https://mustangforums.com/m_941317/tm.htm

you have better options with the 3.8 though

11 psi procharger will put you at 300 rwhp on a stock motor for 4k, sounds like your going to be putting that much into the motor alone for a 5.0

and your car will fail emissions with the 5.0 in it
Old Jun 7, 2007 | 06:33 PM
  #43  
P Zero's Avatar
P Zero
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,986
From: Michigan
Default RE: 5.0 swap...

ORIGINAL: mustangman02232

https://mustangforums.com/m_941317/tm.htm

you have better options with the 3.8 though

11 psi procharger will put you at 300 rwhp on a stock motor for 4k, sounds like your going to be putting that much into the motor alone for a 5.0

and your car will fail emissions with the 5.0 in it
For 4k, I could make more than 300rwhp. And where he (OH)and I (MI) live emmisions arent tested, so that doesnt apply.

ORIGINAL: LilRoush

Depends on the route you go. I did a basic M112 set up for $1500 for a guy. Pump, injectors, MAF, blower and related. Justin made some sweet numbers on his turbo'd stock V6 (ran 10's).
It's all in doing it right and buying the right parts at the right times.

If you are really that doubtful of the internals on the stock 3.8L....get a SC short block with the forged guts for $500. Can't do a forged rotating assembly in a V8 for that much.
You kinda danced around the the price thing. The only price you have was for the S/C, what about the other parts?
-P.
Old Jun 7, 2007 | 06:35 PM
  #44  
MUSTANG042004's Avatar
MUSTANG042004
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 423
Default RE: 5.0 swap...

ORIGINAL: regarkecurb

well thought i'd come in to the v-6 section because i have a 6 now..wanted to get some opinions..my bad..didn't realize all of the v6 guys were against v8's...you can close this thread if you'd like since its nothing but argueing! lol





were not against v8's we just don't like people with v8's talking down on uslike there god or something like nothing can beat a v8.
Old Jun 7, 2007 | 09:36 PM
  #45  
3.8blackout's Avatar
3.8blackout
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 197
From:
Default RE: 5.0 swap...


You kinda danced around the the price thing. The only price you have was for the S/C, what about the other parts?
-P.
Ehh, no he didn't. You can get a M112 unit for $300, and the fuel upgrades arent that expensive. $1500 is what it actually costs to get boosted [sm=chairshot.gif]
Old Jun 7, 2007 | 09:42 PM
  #46  
90lxstang's Avatar
90lxstang
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,879
From: Orlando
Default RE: 5.0 swap...

i don't thing the 3.8 is sluggish at all. before i got my fox i drove a '02 v6 and FOR THE PRICE of the car i think it has great performance and it was an extremely reliable(and much more comfortable) car. just because it says mustang on it doesn't mean it has to be fast. all mustangs are killer cars for the $ and look better than anything on the road 3.8 or 4.6 or 5.0....etc
Old Jun 7, 2007 | 10:14 PM
  #47  
LilRoush's Avatar
LilRoush
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,540
From: South FL
Default RE: 5.0 swap...

ORIGINAL: P Zero


I dont think they copied the intake design, which Ive noticed makes or breaks engines output.

Ok, that right there is why you are retarted. You just made fun of the Minivan 3.8L in the Mustang. What is the main difference? The INTAKE. Wait, what did you jsut say on this line.... the intake design makes or breaks the output? Can you explain why you are talking out of both sides of your mouth?

Go do some homework.

I danced around nothing. I listed a cost. M112's go for $400 all day. If you look, you can beat that, too.I bought my last M112 for $250 with 2.76" pulley already mounted. I've been kicking out V6 M112 kits as fast as I can until production hits. All of my customers have seen close to double the stock hp/tq and have spent less than the price difference between the V6 and V8 for their year.

And I'm not against V8 cars at all. Heck I have one right now (1970 Mach 1 w. 351W). I've also owned 81 fox, 82 fox, 90 GT vert, 93 GT vert (w/347) and a chrome yellow 93 5.0L LX vert. Never accuse me of not loving V8 Mustangs.



Old Jun 8, 2007 | 07:22 PM
  #48  
P Zero's Avatar
P Zero
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,986
From: Michigan
Default RE: 5.0 swap...

ORIGINAL: LilRoush

ORIGINAL: P Zero


I dont think they copied the intake design, which Ive noticed makes or breaks engines output.

Ok, that right there is why you are retarted. You just made fun of the Minivan 3.8L in the Mustang. What is the main difference? The INTAKE. Wait, what did you jsut say on this line.... the intake design makes or breaks the output? Can you explain why you are talking out of both sides of your mouth?

Go do some homework.

I danced around nothing. I listed a cost. M112's go for $400 all day. If you look, you can beat that, too.I bought my last M112 for $250 with 2.76" pulley already mounted. I've been kicking out V6 M112 kits as fast as I can until production hits. All of my customers have seen close to double the stock hp/tq and have spent less than the price difference between the V6 and V8 for their year.

And I'm not against V8 cars at all. Heck I have one right now (1970 Mach 1 w. 351W). I've also owned 81 fox, 82 fox, 90 GT vert, 93 GT vert (w/347) and a chrome yellow 93 5.0L LX vert. Never accuse me of not loving V8 Mustangs.



I guess you either misunderstood what I was saying or you just wanted to use what I said out of context to make me sound, as you so eloquently put it, retarded.
What I said was that Ford DID NOT COPY GM'S DESIGN. Thats why the Ford version is a slug. And the GM version rev's very quickly in comparison.
-P.
Old Jun 8, 2007 | 07:33 PM
  #49  
LilRoush's Avatar
LilRoush
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,540
From: South FL
Default RE: 5.0 swap...

Sorry was retarded the wrong word? A bit slow....how's that? A better way?

I must have misunderstood you then. my apologies.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Granatelli Sales
GT S197 General Discussion
5
Mar 25, 2016 08:01 PM
Urambo Tauro
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
6
Oct 5, 2015 09:37 PM
Matt's 95 Stang
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
2
Oct 5, 2015 07:16 AM
mungodrums
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
10
Sep 28, 2015 10:54 PM
treesloth
New Member Area
4
Sep 28, 2015 07:03 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:40 AM.