Yay
3rd Gear Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 634
From: TX
RE: Yay
Total bs.
342 rwhp would cost a ton of cash. You'd have to be using a power adder and definitely have a cam, intake, and heads as well. And with that power, say goodbye to yourstock tranny and rear also.
Just a thought though, if he did the dyno pull in say, first gear instead of 3rd (in autos) how would that affect his results?
342 rwhp would cost a ton of cash. You'd have to be using a power adder and definitely have a cam, intake, and heads as well. And with that power, say goodbye to yourstock tranny and rear also.
Just a thought though, if he did the dyno pull in say, first gear instead of 3rd (in autos) how would that affect his results?
3rd Gear Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 679
From:
RE: Yay
ORIGINAL: indisposible_teens
I don't know which is worse. The OP saying he has 342hp or the guy saying that the OPgot 50hp from exhaust, CAI, tune, and pullies...
Either way neither one of them should be allowed near a computer again.[&:]
I don't know which is worse. The OP saying he has 342hp or the guy saying that the OPgot 50hp from exhaust, CAI, tune, and pullies...
Either way neither one of them should be allowed near a computer again.[&:]
i was merely pointing out this lil exerpt
and i said 15-20 which is what i have been told
1st Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 110
From:
RE: Yay
ORIGINAL: Fink
Have you guys ever thought that he could possibly have every company sticker known to man on his car? Cause everyone knows that stickers add at least 2-3 HP each. HAHAHA
Have you guys ever thought that he could possibly have every company sticker known to man on his car? Cause everyone knows that stickers add at least 2-3 HP each. HAHAHA
That 12g Termi was funny.
OP, post up some dyno sheets and let us take a look.
4th Gear Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,581
From: Terre Haute, Indiana
RE: Yay
ORIGINAL: skitso
well thats what he said im not saying its true i was pointing out that stock he "dynoed" it at 190 and then after exhaust it was 290
i was merely pointing out this lil exerpt
and i said 15-20 which is what i have been told
ORIGINAL: indisposible_teens
I don't know which is worse. The OP saying he has 342hp or the guy saying that the OPgot 50hp from exhaust, CAI, tune, and pullies...Either way neither one of them should be allowed near a computer again.[&:]
I don't know which is worse. The OP saying he has 342hp or the guy saying that the OPgot 50hp from exhaust, CAI, tune, and pullies...
Either way neither one of them should be allowed near a computer again.[&:]
i was merely pointing out this lil exerpt
and i said 15-20 which is what i have been told
I realize that everyone has to start somewhere when they are learning cars but from now on try not to post magazine numbers when you are talking about bolt-ons. Everyone knows that companies only advertise the best numbers that they can pull. Try reading a bit more and learning a bit more before you start to give out bad advice or wrong opinions. Sorry if I seem like an ******* but post like yours are what spreads bad info about cars.
3rd Gear Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 880
From: CA
RE: Yay
ORIGINAL: MustangMike2001
Yeah right dude! More like..
Pullies 10
exhaust 10
chip 15
ORIGINAL: skitso
i dont think 242 is all that hard to get w/ what he listed
pullies like 35ish
exhaust 15-20 ish
and a chip may be 15-25
so 242 not to bad but 342 is ridiculous
cause stock is 190 so he only has to get what 52 ish to get to 242
i dont think 242 is all that hard to get w/ what he listed
pullies like 35ish
exhaust 15-20 ish
and a chip may be 15-25
so 242 not to bad but 342 is ridiculous
cause stock is 190 so he only has to get what 52 ish to get to 242
Pullies 10
exhaust 10
chip 15
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post