Should ford have used the 4.0L from the trucks in the SN95's?
06-13-2008, 07:02 PM
#1
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lincoln, Rhode Island
Posts: 2,261
Should ford have used the 4.0L from the trucks in the SN95's?
ok like i said. I have a ford explorer now with the 4.0L and i love it. Do you think ford should have used it in the mustangs in exchange of the 3.8L?
06-13-2008, 09:16 PM
#5
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lincoln, Rhode Island
Posts: 2,261
RE: Should ford have used the 4.0L from the trucks in the SN95's?
yeah, it would have been cool if they used it back then. there has to be a reason behind why they changed from the 3.8L to the 4.0L.
06-14-2008, 09:15 AM
#7
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lincoln, Rhode Island
Posts: 2,261
RE: Should ford have used the 4.0L from the trucks in the SN95's?
remember tho, the 3.8L of the time had less HP and less torque than the 4.0L. now the 4.0L has more power and torque than the 3.8L splitport
06-15-2008, 02:31 AM
#10
Buyer Beware
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,586
RE: Should ford have used the 4.0L from the trucks in the SN95'
ORIGINAL: 92lxsleeper
remember tho, the 3.8L of the time had less HP and less torque than the 4.0L. now the 4.0L has more power and torque than the 3.8L splitport
remember tho, the 3.8L of the time had less HP and less torque than the 4.0L. now the 4.0L has more power and torque than the 3.8L splitport