Getting beat by a Camry??!!!?
I saw these stats on new Camrys: http://www.mpt.org/motorweek/reviews/rt2530b.shtml it seems to have more HP even a bit more torque and 0-60 in just about the same. Seems our stock V6 are somewhat underpowered,....funny thing I used to have a Camry before my new Stang, but its engine died.......
daaaaaaaaaaaamn...... 268 hp? something aint right there. camry's used to be some of the lightest cars around. if they were pushin 268 hp and only hitting 14.9 then they must now be heavy as crap.....
Camry isn't geared near as aggressivly as a Mustang, it's geared for a smooth, quiet, comfortable ride, and its heavy because it has all the bells and whistles family sedans of its type, like the TL get, hp and tq isn't the only thing that matters in a race.
ORIGINAL: jericho73
Camry isn't geared near as aggressivly as a Mustang, it's geared for a smooth, quiet, comfortable ride, and its heavy because it has all the bells and whistles family sedans of its type, like the TL get, hp and tq isn't the only thing that matters in a race.
Camry isn't geared near as aggressivly as a Mustang, it's geared for a smooth, quiet, comfortable ride, and its heavy because it has all the bells and whistles family sedans of its type, like the TL get, hp and tq isn't the only thing that matters in a race.
) the camrys have been light as hell. the corolla and camry were both under 3k. the corolla was like 2600 lbs (i used to own one [>:]) but i guess they must have changed em up a bit....
ORIGINAL: SpecterGT260
thats odd tho.... cuz historically (although breifly
) the camrys have been light as hell. the corolla and camry were both under 3k. the corolla was like 2600 lbs (i used to own one [>:]) but i guess they must have changed em up a bit....
thats odd tho.... cuz historically (although breifly
) the camrys have been light as hell. the corolla and camry were both under 3k. the corolla was like 2600 lbs (i used to own one [>:]) but i guess they must have changed em up a bit....


