Info-research on X Charger
#21
RE: Info-research on X Charger
yah and it offers mas boost in the low rmp area, thats EXACTLY where the 4.0 needs it, below 3k its a pig. im settleing my mind on x charger, IF it EVER comes out!
Now all i need if to see sum numbers!!! where are they? do they want to sell this product or what?!
Paul
Now all i need if to see sum numbers!!! where are they? do they want to sell this product or what?!
Paul
#22
RE: Info-research on X Charger
ORIGINAL: omer333
I wanna know what you did to get that kind of gain and is it to the wheel. You can send me a PM if you don't want to give your secret away
I wanna know what you did to get that kind of gain and is it to the wheel. You can send me a PM if you don't want to give your secret away
#23
RE: Info-research on X Charger
yeah, im glad they want to get all the kinks worked out for the x-charger, but i mean is this something that may just flop and never become a real thing? Or is it really gonna come out??? I mean explorer express doesnt even show it as an upcoming thing, so im wondering if were all waiting on nothing?
#24
RE: Info-research on X Charger
to put things in perspective (i know 14.5 is good for us, but i want better), im about 1 of 2 v6 mustangs in our local 05 club here (and only one that races). Most of the gts, with gears, intake, exhaust, tune, etc are running 13.6 (quickest of them ive seen) to 15.0. Our conditions here are far from perfect. The guy that tuned my car owns a 2005 mustang GT auto with cutouts and a tune. I lined up against him at the track (per his request) and took him by .13 in a 100% heads up race. Iwould love to get my car to a track that is in good conditions. I think this car has 14.3s or 14.2s in her with the right conditions, and a tune for the track (i run my street tune at the track, im sure i could squeeze even more with a track only tune). MM49 ran a 14.3 with a custom track tune that he made. He has access to a dyno, and hes an SCT tuner. I dont like the idea of leaning out the car and turning off the knock sensors and running racing fuel, but to each his own lol.
#25
RE: Info-research on X Charger
Afixer has 1, so its defenatly in the works and can me made to work on the 4.0, something is taking alot of time to work out tho.
maybe there trying to make it more cost affective for them to make or sumthing.
Paul
maybe there trying to make it more cost affective for them to make or sumthing.
Paul
#26
RE: Info-research on X Charger
ORIGINAL: fazm
oh i know u werent comparing, im just sayin the 1/8th is going to be misleading on the xcharger. at 7psi its probably going to be a high 13 second car with the right setup. Mid 13s is probably the best it will see on that low of boost. now 9psi... maybe maybe low 13s, but probably never a 12 sec car.
I love the looks of the xcharger, i just could never see myself spending 3200 (or whatever it is) plus the cost of an sct2 (they said it was not included) for 260rwhp. Im only like 45 away from that now anyway.
oh i know u werent comparing, im just sayin the 1/8th is going to be misleading on the xcharger. at 7psi its probably going to be a high 13 second car with the right setup. Mid 13s is probably the best it will see on that low of boost. now 9psi... maybe maybe low 13s, but probably never a 12 sec car.
I love the looks of the xcharger, i just could never see myself spending 3200 (or whatever it is) plus the cost of an sct2 (they said it was not included) for 260rwhp. Im only like 45 away from that now anyway.
#28
RE: Info-research on X Charger
ORIGINAL: Jimp
Wasn't Afixer's car basically stock when they put the X-Charger on? So realistically, you'd be over 260 because you are starting with at least 30hp more than stock.
ORIGINAL: fazm
oh i know u werent comparing, im just sayin the 1/8th is going to be misleading on the xcharger. at 7psi its probably going to be a high 13 second car with the right setup. Mid 13s is probably the best it will see on that low of boost. now 9psi... maybe maybe low 13s, but probably never a 12 sec car.
I love the looks of the xcharger, i just could never see myself spending 3200 (or whatever it is) plus the cost of an sct2 (they said it was not included) for 260rwhp. Im only like 45 away from that now anyway.
oh i know u werent comparing, im just sayin the 1/8th is going to be misleading on the xcharger. at 7psi its probably going to be a high 13 second car with the right setup. Mid 13s is probably the best it will see on that low of boost. now 9psi... maybe maybe low 13s, but probably never a 12 sec car.
I love the looks of the xcharger, i just could never see myself spending 3200 (or whatever it is) plus the cost of an sct2 (they said it was not included) for 260rwhp. Im only like 45 away from that now anyway.
Afixer does have GT takes offs which is good for 10RWHP... and since you really can't reuse your CAI... i would say you have to cut that 30HP down a bit...
#29
RE: Info-research on X Charger
actually you can use your CAI if you have one. since my car will be for the carb cert we opted to keep the stock air box. when we were in napa we tried a few CAI's with minimal gain. i am sure doug will try them again with the install he is doing this week. he will have much more time on a dyno than he had with my car. remember i had to leave so his tune section was cut short. i am sure he will find more hr for you power mongers.
#30
RE: Info-research on X Charger
ORIGINAL: scrming
Afixer does have GT takes offs which is good for 10RWHP... and since you really can't reuse your CAI... i would say you have to cut that 30HP down a bit...
Afixer does have GT takes offs which is good for 10RWHP... and since you really can't reuse your CAI... i would say you have to cut that 30HP down a bit...