Notices
V6 S197 General Discussion This section is for technical discussions pertaining specifically to the V6 variation of the 2005 and newer Ford Mustang.

Stupid question I think

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-07-2006, 09:38 PM
  #11  
28HopUp
MF Administrator
 
28HopUp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 8,191
Default RE: NADDA Stupid question I think

Before my C&L (cold air induction) and tune from Evolution, my car dyno'd (Mustang Dyno) at 180 rwhp (4.0L/auto). That was with a GT take-off muffler. After the tune, I was at 190 rwhp (93 Extreme tune), but that was with zero miles on the new parts/tune and we did not reset the car per instructions in the manual after reconnecting the battery. Within a day, my car was even stronger than when I left their shop. So my next time on the dyno should generate better numbers (it will be cooler outside too), and then I'll know for sure. Also looking to get some 1/4 mile times soon!!!

As stated previously, having the throttle lag virtually gone is enough reason to get a tune (and CAI). These cars have a torque management program in the PC too, and most tunes fix that. My car has much better low end torque getting to the ground, which increases the smile-factor exponentially.

And BTW, you didn't ask a stupid question (per subject line)
28HopUp is offline  
Old 09-07-2006, 09:41 PM
  #12  
v6stanggoddess
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
v6stanggoddess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Posts: 128
Default RE: Stupid question I think


ORIGINAL: 28hopup



As stated previously, having the throttle lag virtually gone is enough reason to get a tune (and CAI).

It really makes that much of a difference huh?
v6stanggoddess is offline  
Old 09-07-2006, 09:43 PM
  #13  
jericho73
3rd Gear Member
 
jericho73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Coral Springs, Fl
Posts: 788
Default RE: Stupid question I think

ORIGINAL: v6stanggoddess

Jericho thank you very much. That too makes a lot of sense. The only thing I am confused about though is this website specifically said 190 RWHP with their tune. Unless I am reading it wrong? It is the Alternative Auto website


That sounds right. That would be 20 over stock rwhp, they may be going by manual numbers but lets run with 190...that would be a little over 230 at the crank, up from the stock 210 chp.

so it's...

170 rwhp--> 190 rwhp

or you could say

210 chp--> 230 chp
jericho73 is offline  
Old 09-07-2006, 09:48 PM
  #14  
28HopUp
MF Administrator
 
28HopUp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 8,191
Default RE: Stupid question I think

v6stanggoddess Date 9/7/2006 7:41:33 PM

ORIGINAL: 28hopup

As stated previously, having the throttle lag virtually gone is enough reason to get a tune (and CAI).
It really makes that much of a difference huh?
Before the tune, my car would not spin the tire at all unless the road wa slippery. Nadda peep from the tire. Pulling out in front of traffic had to be timed in such a way that the car spooled up into the power band before I'd get hit. No fun whatsoever.

After the tune, the car seemed to be awakended. Some folks say it feels like a different car. That's not how I would describe it. With a tune, the car feels like it is running the way Ford should have built it in the first place. MUCH MORE FUN TO DRIVE!
28HopUp is offline  
Old 09-07-2006, 10:05 PM
  #15  
v6stanggoddess
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
v6stanggoddess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Posts: 128
Default RE: Stupid question I think

Ok, well since you guys put it that way it is VERY much worth it. 230 HP is good I feel. I really do not understand the rwhp at all. I know it is at the rear wheels and it is better than HP. But I just, well, everything in HP makes more sense to me for some reason. So 230 HP is really awesome! That is almost at my friends G35 I think?
v6stanggoddess is offline  
Old 09-07-2006, 10:09 PM
  #16  
Black Stang 3200492
2nd Gear Member
 
Black Stang 3200492's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location:
Posts: 292
Default RE: Stupid question I think

my car wont start now with the custom tune, it starts but then the car dies. Is it because I have to put the cold air intake in first because i think the tunes are for the cold air intake.
Black Stang 3200492 is offline  
Old 09-07-2006, 10:22 PM
  #17  
joshetc
2nd Gear Member
 
joshetc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 242
Default RE: Stupid question I think

I was always under the impression that rwhp was Real World Horse Power, I've seen people use RWHP on AWD and FWD vehicles as well.

Anyway, its pretty simple. The engine is rated at 210 at the crankshaft (before resistance from transmission and driveshaft and other factors). The HP left after all of those things is RWHP or the horsepower given to the wheels themselves. Apparently the stick loses about 15% of its horsepower through the process of converting it to the wheels (also known as drivetrain loss) The auto loses roughly 20%.

So a 210 HP car would be

210 x 0.8 = 168 HP -- Auto
210 x 0.85 = 178.5 HP -- Manual

The main reason this is done as its MUCH easier to measure the HP from the wheels than from the crankshaft, which is how they do it at the factory. It would be much less confusing if the manufacturers would rate the RWHP instead of CHP but CHP is always higher so it looks more appealing to consumers.
joshetc is offline  
Old 09-07-2006, 10:31 PM
  #18  
jericho73
3rd Gear Member
 
jericho73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Coral Springs, Fl
Posts: 788
Default RE: Stupid question I think

ORIGINAL: v6stanggoddess

Ok, well since you guys put it that way it is VERY much worth it. 230 HP is good I feel. I really do not understand the rwhp at all. I know it is at the rear wheels and it is better than HP. But I just, well, everything in HP makes more sense to me for some reason. So 230 HP is really awesome! That is almost at my friends G35 I think?
You're mixing up ratings again...let's just stick with chp for now, since you seem more comfortable with that.

G35- 280 chp <stock auto>

Mustang v6-230 chp <w/ tune>

so its still quite a difference.

Rwhp and chp are the same things, just different measurments of it. Rwhp is a more accurate measurment of the power you're really getting. The g35 would be at about 230 rwhp stock, while, as said, you'd be at 190 rwhp. New edge v6's were 190 chp, but like 150 rwho for example. Every car is going to show a much lower rwhp # then chp #, that's why car companies use chp.
jericho73 is offline  
Old 09-07-2006, 11:51 PM
  #19  
28HopUp
MF Administrator
 
28HopUp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 8,191
Default RE: Stupid question I think

joshetc Date 9/7/2006 8:22:20 PM
I was always under the impression that rwhp was Real World Horse Power, I've seen people use RWHP on AWD and FWD vehicles as well.
To clarify, rwhp = Rear Wheel Horse Power. And you are right, I've seen people use the term on FWD cars too.
28HopUp is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dokilar
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
15
10-16-2015 08:13 PM
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
3
10-02-2015 08:06 AM
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
0
10-01-2015 10:29 AM
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
0
10-01-2015 09:21 AM
treesloth
New Member Area
4
09-28-2015 07:03 AM



Quick Reply: Stupid question I think



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26 PM.