Us vs. Civic Si
01-19-2007, 11:06 AM
#2
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: State Of Confusion
Posts: 1,199
RE: Us vs. Civic Si
what do you think?
Edmuds isn't always right and it's just an opinion.
I'd take it with a grain of salt ifI were you.
The mustang is a classic. Honda's are just econoboxes for average people to rice lovers.
Edmuds isn't always right and it's just an opinion.
I'd take it with a grain of salt ifI were you.
The mustang is a classic. Honda's are just econoboxes for average people to rice lovers.
01-19-2007, 02:01 PM
#3
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: arizona
Posts: 3,893
RE: Us vs. Civic Si
dont forget about weight, gear ratios, number of gears, etc. theres lots of things to consider, and it seems not too many people here do, before jumping to conclusions.
on paper, the SI is faster, but ive always beat them at the track (and yes the new ones, the old ones i slaughter). Quickest ive seen one go is 15.7
on paper, the SI is faster, but ive always beat them at the track (and yes the new ones, the old ones i slaughter). Quickest ive seen one go is 15.7
01-19-2007, 02:29 PM
#4
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: State Of Confusion
Posts: 1,199
RE: Us vs. Civic Si
no, no,,,there is no comparison between a rice burner and a Ford Mustang.
Ever heard of a classic honda? I don't think so.
Some people confuse themselves with comparisons that need no comparing. There ain't any!
Ever heard of a classic honda? I don't think so.
Some people confuse themselves with comparisons that need no comparing. There ain't any!
01-19-2007, 04:07 PM
#5
RE: Us vs. Civic Si
ORIGINAL: wolfey2k
no, no,,,there is no comparison between a rice burner and a Ford Mustang.
Ever heard of a classic honda? I don't think so.
Some people confuse themselves with comparisons that need no comparing. There ain't any!
no, no,,,there is no comparison between a rice burner and a Ford Mustang.
Ever heard of a classic honda? I don't think so.
Some people confuse themselves with comparisons that need no comparing. There ain't any!
01-19-2007, 04:41 PM
#7
RE: Us vs. Civic Si
ORIGINAL: wolfey2k
no, no,,,there is no comparison between a rice burner and a Ford Mustang.
Ever heard of a classic honda? I don't think so.
Some people confuse themselves with comparisons that need no comparing. There ain't any!
no, no,,,there is no comparison between a rice burner and a Ford Mustang.
Ever heard of a classic honda? I don't think so.
Some people confuse themselves with comparisons that need no comparing. There ain't any!
i dont know about you all but i ve never stopped or been stopped in a honda and asked a dozen questions about the ride......but my pony....well do i need to say more......also is there such a thing as a classic honda......hmmmmmm....nope!
01-19-2007, 07:19 PM
#9
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 19
RE: Us vs. Civic Si
ORIGINAL: DragonPL
I was looking at Edmunds and it compares the Mustang V6 to a Civic Si. Does a I4 car with 100 less torque really compare to our 6s? If so....hmmmmmmm
I was looking at Edmunds and it compares the Mustang V6 to a Civic Si. Does a I4 car with 100 less torque really compare to our 6s? If so....hmmmmmmm
01-19-2007, 07:22 PM
#10
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CO
Posts: 3,095
RE: Us vs. Civic Si
i hate magazine comparos. what's funny is almost all of the comparos or tests of the v6 use a totally base car with an automatic.....wow way to show the true performance of the car....yet they opt for the dsg tranny on the new gti that costs a grand more and is faster. most magazines hate american cars, and just further hurt the name of the v6 mustang....edmunds reliabilitiy ratings for 2005 had the mustang gt as average, and the v6 as very poor (the lowest rating) now i haven't really heard of ANY engine problems on stock motors here, so whats the big difference in reliability from?