Notices
V6 S197 General Discussion This section is for technical discussions pertaining specifically to the V6 variation of the 2005 and newer Ford Mustang.

Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-30-2008, 12:52 PM
  #11  
ODDYSEY
Site Moderator of Fury!
 
ODDYSEY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,104
Default RE: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE

ORIGINAL: tedBalog

They made a 3.5L Duratec and a 3.7L Duratec the 3.5 making 265Hp and the 3.7 making 273.. All DOHC
The new 3.5L duratech they engineered to be able to go up to 4.0L and handle twin turbo's DOHC and put out 365 HP.
ODDYSEY is offline  
Old 04-30-2008, 12:56 PM
  #12  
basketballord
4th Gear Member
 
basketballord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Big Sky Country
Posts: 1,079
Default RE: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE

The 3.5L in the dodges are pretty peppy. anybody know what kind of torque those things make?

I think driver would be the main factor, but i think you'd have to have a CAI and tune if you wanted to keep up. i am surprised the base challenger is only 420 lbs more than ours. that thing looks huge.
basketballord is offline  
Old 04-30-2008, 01:03 PM
  #13  
basketballord
4th Gear Member
 
basketballord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Big Sky Country
Posts: 1,079
Default RE: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE

ORIGINAL: ODDYSEY

ORIGINAL: tedBalog

They made a 3.5L Duratec and a 3.7L Duratec the 3.5 making 265Hp and the 3.7 making 273.. All DOHC
The new 3.5L duratech they engineered to be able to go up to 4.0L and handle twin turbo's DOHC and put out 365 HP.
However, I would be surprised to see the TT duratec (TwinForce) come into fruition as far as production vehicles go. I'll believe it when I see it.
basketballord is offline  
Old 04-30-2008, 02:04 PM
  #14  
yellowneck86
2nd Gear Member
 
yellowneck86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ca
Posts: 247
Default RE: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE

so the challenger will have the same engine as the charger sxt, does any one smell a dog eat dog scenario here? It kinda reminds me of the corvette and camaro.
yellowneck86 is offline  
Old 04-30-2008, 02:05 PM
  #15  
07 Stang
6th Gear Member
 
07 Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Southeast Virginia
Posts: 6,409
Default RE: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE

ORIGINAL: Wishbone

Well that is 40 more hp than what we have. Probably would come down to the driver. You can check the specs here...

http://www.dodge.com/en/2009/challen.../se/index.html
I noticed it's a 4-speed automatic. Would that make a difference? Seems like it would make it a tad slower.
07 Stang is offline  
Old 04-30-2008, 04:24 PM
  #16  
Ratrodder85
1st Gear Member
 
Ratrodder85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location:
Posts: 82
Default RE: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE

I work for Chrysler, and drive the 3.5 chargers and 300s pretty often. They don't seem quite as quick as my car, but they are quite a bit bigger. The numbers say 250 hp@6400 rpm, and 250 ft-lbs at 3800 rpm. That said, the challenger is a beautiful car.

I have checked out one of the first SRT8s and everything is amazing except the interior. It's boring and looks exactly like the Charger. Hopefully by the time they release other models such as the R/T and v6 next year they will fix that.
Ratrodder85 is offline  
Old 04-30-2008, 05:15 PM
  #17  
05nightrider
2nd Gear Member
 
05nightrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Posts: 378
Default RE: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE

arent the challengers going to have a bit more of a race tune? with that said we should have a cai and tune to be even with add ons.. ours just didnt come from the factory that way and thus lower cost to us. that gives us a good extra20+ ponies and close to it in terms of quickness not necessarily power... plus i would think the only option tranny wise, a 4spd auto, would not make it extremely economical... and if they are treating 4th gear as O/D (like our 5th) then we should have an advantage there. then again i might just be full of crap haha...

on the other hand.. it is a GORGEOUS car... props to dodge for really capturing the muscle car retro look... chevy i dont think has done it with the camaro (if it ever comes out hehe).. too modern...

but if they are saying that its going to start at 24 or 25 grand, theres a lot i can do with my six to make it quicker for 4-6 grand. or i could just buy a GT. ill stick to the classic american icon. thank you!
05nightrider is offline  
Old 04-30-2008, 05:48 PM
  #18  
logicbombx
2nd Gear Member
 
logicbombx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 240
Default RE: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE

I've read that 210 HP for the V6 is underratted any truth to that.
logicbombx is offline  
Old 04-30-2008, 06:34 PM
  #19  
Wishbone
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Wishbone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 202
Default RE: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE

Well yeah when the new Civic Si 4 cylinder has 200 hp.
Wishbone is offline  
Old 04-30-2008, 06:34 PM
  #20  
landon.moss
2nd Gear Member
 
landon.moss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: IA
Posts: 433
Default RE: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE

i love the new challengers, even tho they're HUGE-actually kinda like the se better than the rt, etc.same as how i think the v6 stangs look better than the v8s- was gonna wait for one since i'm a mopar guy, but i love the mustangs too, so when i had a chance to get my 05 i did...waited for 3 years - and it was def worth it[8D]
landon.moss is offline  


Quick Reply: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:38 PM.