Notices
V6 S197 General Discussion This section is for technical discussions pertaining specifically to the V6 variation of the 2005 and newer Ford Mustang.

Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-30-2008, 06:55 PM
  #21  
phunnyguy
4th Gear Member
 
phunnyguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles California
Posts: 1,200
Default RE: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE

uummm since when is dodge going to make a v6 challenger????...i know the charger comes in v6.....but i think the challenger will only be a v8......
phunnyguy is offline  
Old 04-30-2008, 06:58 PM
  #22  
landon.moss
2nd Gear Member
 
landon.moss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: IA
Posts: 433
Default RE: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE

1st year all challengers will be hemi 8s with autos i believe....2nd prod year will include a v6, a de-tuned v8, and the addition of the manual trans
landon.moss is offline  
Old 04-30-2008, 07:04 PM
  #23  
phunnyguy
4th Gear Member
 
phunnyguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles California
Posts: 1,200
Default RE: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE

great nows theres two cars i want in 2010....LOL>...the new stang and the challenger....need to start playing the lotto again
phunnyguy is offline  
Old 04-30-2008, 07:36 PM
  #24  
davesyo
2nd Gear Member
 
davesyo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 336
Default RE: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE


ORIGINAL: logicbombx

I've read that 210 HP for the V6 is underratted any truth to that.

I know that I have heard and read on this forum a while back that actual output is closer to 220-225 net
davesyo is offline  
Old 04-30-2008, 08:35 PM
  #25  
StreamlineStang
3rd Gear Member
 
StreamlineStang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 757
Default RE: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE

It doesn't really matter on how many litters, my 96 Mitsubishi 3000GT (N/A DOHC V6) is a 3 litter and puts down 222hp at the crank. It's all in the design of the engines. Ford really hasn't made a LOT of changes to their motors over the years, at least compared to the other companies that is.
StreamlineStang is offline  
Old 04-30-2008, 09:04 PM
  #26  
phunnyguy
4th Gear Member
 
phunnyguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles California
Posts: 1,200
Default RE: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE

ORIGINAL: davesyo


ORIGINAL: logicbombx

I've read that 210 HP for the V6 is underratted any truth to that.

I know that I have heard and read on this forum a while back that actual output is closer to 220-225 net
210 is at the crank....at the wheels its between 180 and 190....cai tune and sual will bring it to around 225 at the crank and probably about 200-210 at the wheels...this is based ona 5 % to 10% loss from the crank to the wheels...
phunnyguy is offline  
Old 04-30-2008, 09:08 PM
  #27  
07 Stang
6th Gear Member
 
07 Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Southeast Virginia
Posts: 6,409
Default RE: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE

ORIGINAL: phunnyguy

uummm since when is dodge going to make a v6 challenger????...i know the charger comes in v6.....but i think the challenger will only be a v8......
According to their website, they are coming out with a V6 dubbed the Challenger SE.

Check the link below;

http://www.dodge.com/en/2009/challen...rmance/engine/

It had this to say about the SE's engine;

3.5 liter High-Output SOHC V6
A dual-tuned intake manifold utilizes a short runner valve, bringing you 250 horses at 6800 rpm and 250 lb-ft of torque at 3800 rpm. Partnered with a sophisticated electronic throttle control system that tailors the pedal-movement response based on operating conditions, plus platinum-tip spark plugs and the coil-on plug ignition system, you'll reap benefits like more consistent speed and reduced emissions. (standard on SE).



07 Stang is offline  
Old 04-30-2008, 09:09 PM
  #28  
The Potato
3rd Gear Member
 
The Potato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 569
Default RE: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE



A CHALLENGER APPEARS!
The Potato is offline  
Old 04-30-2008, 09:39 PM
  #29  
07lane40
3rd Gear Member
 
07lane40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location:
Posts: 992
Default RE: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE

ORIGINAL: Ratrodder85


I have checked out one of the first SRT8s and everything is amazing except the interior. It's boring and looks exactly like the Charger. Hopefully by the time they release other models such as the R/T and v6 next year they will fix that.
what about the open diff on the SRT8??? i dont get why you'd but an expensive high power car with an open diff.. ive seen pics of the car burning out with only one wheel spinning. hell even the base mustang GT has a posi rear...
07lane40 is offline  
Old 04-30-2008, 09:44 PM
  #30  
07lane40
3rd Gear Member
 
07lane40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location:
Posts: 992
Default RE: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE

ORIGINAL: phunnyguy

ORIGINAL: davesyo


ORIGINAL: logicbombx

I've read that 210 HP for the V6 is underratted any truth to that.

I know that I have heard and read on this forum a while back that actual output is closer to 220-225 net
210 is at the crank....at the wheels its between 180 and 190....cai tune and sual will bring it to around 225 at the crank and probably about 200-210 at the wheels...this is based ona 5 % to 10% loss from the crank to the wheels...
there supposed to be a general rule of 15% drivetrain loss (20% for autos) which would lead one to think that our cars are underrated. 15 % would give you more like 220-225.
07lane40 is offline  


Quick Reply: Mustang V6 vs. Challenger SE



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:49 PM.