New X-Charger Numbers
#12
RE: New X-Charger Numbers
He is probably talking about Steeda QS6 ... which even if they are talking about NET HP and TQ seem kind high ...
http://www.steeda.com/new_vehicles/V6/
Whoops ... I was wrong about EE's dyno chart .... I was thinking they were showing over 300 HP & TQ ... I was wrong ...
http://www.steeda.com/new_vehicles/V6/
Whoops ... I was wrong about EE's dyno chart .... I was thinking they were showing over 300 HP & TQ ... I was wrong ...
#13
RE: New X-Charger Numbers
ORIGINAL: Maverickaf17
Most numbers I see, torque is a smaller number than HP. So... is it bad that I have a lot more torque than HP?
Most numbers I see, torque is a smaller number than HP. So... is it bad that I have a lot more torque than HP?
TQ is the important number ... TQ = pulling power and quickness .... the more TQ the better .... don't worry about HP if you got the TQ ...
#17
RE: New X-Charger Numbers
Also, don't forget when they advertise the stock GT or saleen they are normally reporting hp at the crank. Motortrend did a comparison of several Mustang tuners and only the Shelby GT was rated higher in rwhp and rwtq. The saleen, roush and stock cars were the same or lower. Numbers will vary from dyno to dyno also, so try not to get caught up in the numbers. What is important is that the X charger adds a good 40% increase in rwhp and rwtq to your car. The intercooler adds only more potential.
#18
RE: New X-Charger Numbers
ORIGINAL: mustangpogi
Not even 300HP!!!, I remember that a lot of people here said that with X you can beat a GT. How X can beat a GT if not even close to 300HP? I have a V6 too and I have 2nd thought of getting a X-charger versus trading ifor GT.
Not even 300HP!!!, I remember that a lot of people here said that with X you can beat a GT. How X can beat a GT if not even close to 300HP? I have a V6 too and I have 2nd thought of getting a X-charger versus trading ifor GT.