Notices
V6 S197 General Discussion This section is for technical discussions pertaining specifically to the V6 variation of the 2005 and newer Ford Mustang.

X-Charger Xtreme numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-23-2010, 12:14 AM
  #1  
Torch_Vert
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Torch_Vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 3,213
Default X-Charger Xtreme numbers

While the west coast branch of the X-men were partying down with equipment upgrades and inducting a new member today, X-Charger Secret Agent Double-Naught 4 was on a dangerous covert assignment deep into the wilds of New Jersey.

Dave Vanek at EE and Jim D'Amore Sr of JDM Engineering had cooked up a plan to get an X-Charger Xtreme car down to JDM in Freehold, NJ so Jim Sr, could work his tuning magic on it. Since I was a mere 4.5 hours away (5.5 if one counts the traffic delay due to an accident being cleared on the highway in NYC) I took on the assignment.

I had to roll out at 4:00 am this morning from Boston in order to make it down to JDM bright and early for Jim to tackle the car (Big thanks to my daughter and her boyfriend for volunteering to tag along despite the crazy departure time)

We got to JDM and I met up with Jim's son, Jim Jr, and Ned Shortsleeve (Former staffer with Saleen and Techco, now at JDM) The guys were both great fun to hang out with for the better part of the day, as Jim Sr dug into tuning my car.

Now Jim Sr is not really the chatty type, in fact he can be downright gruff at times, but after you see him work, the focus and incredible attention to detail, you can't help but like the guy. And he knows tuning backwards and forwards. And most probably sideways.

He worked on creating a tune for the Xtreme setup for the best part of the day (with some necessary interruptions due to other JDM business) and let me tell you he was sucessful. REALLY sucessful imho.

I just got home about 11:00pm, and honestly, that ride home was the best fun I've ever had in a 'stang, and I wasn't even pushing it at all hard (well, ok, maybe a LITTLE...)

First the numbers, the baseline dyno run using the canned (non-JDM) tune came to a bit over 300HP on my car, and I had also noted my highway gas mileage was horrible (we're talking around 20mpg, when I was getting around 25 with the previous Wet-X canned tune. Jim actually asked me if the mileage was bad with the existing tune before I'd even brought it up.

After Jim tackled things, this is what we ended up with:



I assure you that bottomless well of torque feels about like you'd expect from the graph... Jim thinks there's even more possible with the Xtreme, especially with a couple suggested mods, but we both decided not to explore the outer limits today, and stick with the good, solid and very safe gains.

Jim took the car out for a bit to be sure he was happy with the tuning in the "real world", and signed off on it with two 20' strips of top quality Goodyear driveway sealant in front of the shop

This isn't the end of the story though. Not nearly.

Jim spent at least as much time tweaking the tune for drivability as he did on maxing the output. I don't know what magic he worked on the throttle system, but this is a different car now. The pedal is in full sync with the TB in a way I hadn't thought possible with the drive by wire setup in these cars. You can almost "feel" the linkage opening the throttle butterfly. I have no clue what he did, or how he did it, but my hat is off to the gentleman. The car is also far more responsive under normal (non-boost) operation, the mileage on the return trip was also up around 25 mpg, and that was with the top down and at least a bit of spirited "experimentation".

JDM may well be getting more involved with X-Charger stuff, and all I can say from my experience is I believe that to be a very good thing.

Last edited by Torch_Vert; 05-23-2010 at 12:28 AM.
Torch_Vert is offline  
Old 05-23-2010, 12:31 AM
  #2  
Mr. Ugly
3rd Gear Member
 
Mr. Ugly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CA
Posts: 634
Default

Great numbers there, Paul!

Congrats on the setup and tune!
Mr. Ugly is offline  
Old 05-23-2010, 02:30 AM
  #3  
killdar
2nd Gear Member
 
killdar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: mass
Posts: 412
Default

Nice #'s. May still consider it in the future since now you've gotten dyno #'s closer to 330hp.
killdar is offline  
Old 05-23-2010, 10:18 AM
  #4  
cubican
1st Gear Member
 
cubican's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 73
Default

Great # paul what about your fuel pump, and how much timming on it. Is great to see some # out of all the xtremes.
cubican is offline  
Old 05-23-2010, 11:21 AM
  #5  
MOOK3456
4th Gear Member
 
MOOK3456's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: over yonder
Posts: 1,185
Default

Nice. I can't wait to get mine. Probably not happening until next year though.
MOOK3456 is offline  
Old 05-23-2010, 11:36 AM
  #6  
beaustang
5th Gear Member
 
beaustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,006
Default

How did you get 12+ psi? I had belt slip on my dyno yesterday and only made 8.4psi on the 2.6 pulley but still made 302hp and 330 torque on 91 octane CA gas. man, if I could make 13psi (I don't think I want to lol) I could be making numbers like you!
beaustang is offline  
Old 05-23-2010, 12:37 PM
  #7  
Torch_Vert
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Torch_Vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 3,213
Default

Originally Posted by beaustang
How did you get 12+ psi? I had belt slip on my dyno yesterday and only made 8.4psi on the 2.6 pulley but still made 302hp and 330 torque on 91 octane CA gas. man, if I could make 13psi (I don't think I want to lol) I could be making numbers like you!
The 12+psi was just the tail end of the run, and Jim was winding it out pretty high. My regular boost numbers peak a bit over 10 psi going by my Autometer gauge. If you look at the full size chart, it's easy to see boost didn't bump above 10-10.5 psi for about 90% of the run.

The carbinite coated pulley seems to have been key in the lack of belt slip.

Last edited by Torch_Vert; 05-23-2010 at 12:51 PM.
Torch_Vert is offline  
Old 05-23-2010, 12:40 PM
  #8  
Torch_Vert
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Torch_Vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 3,213
Default

Originally Posted by cubican
Great # paul what about your fuel pump, and how much timming on it. Is great to see some # out of all the xtremes.
Fuel pump is stock, and Jim Jr said there's plenty of headroom there.I'm not sure what total timing advance JDM's tune is running (I can verify it sure works though)

Last edited by Torch_Vert; 05-23-2010 at 01:48 PM.
Torch_Vert is offline  
Old 05-23-2010, 01:14 PM
  #9  
beaustang
5th Gear Member
 
beaustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,006
Default

Originally Posted by Torch_Vert
Fuel pump is stock, and Jim said there's plenty of headroom there.I'm not sure what total timing advance he's running (I can verify it sure works though)
All of our cars were running 95 to 98%, not much room at all.
beaustang is offline  
Old 05-23-2010, 01:47 PM
  #10  
Torch_Vert
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Torch_Vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 3,213
Default

Originally Posted by beaustang
All of our cars were running 95 to 98%, not much room at all.
Seems odd to me with modded GT's in that HP range running on factory pumps all day long without issue. Maybe extra fuel needed for cylinder cooling due to the 91?
Torch_Vert is offline  


Quick Reply: X-Charger Xtreme numbers



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:47 PM.