V6 S197 General Discussion This section is for technical discussions pertaining specifically to the V6 variation of the 2005 and newer Ford Mustang.

3.73 or lower?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 29, 2005 | 11:14 AM
  #1  
screaminyellin6's Avatar
screaminyellin6
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 237
From:
Default 3.73 or lower?

I am looking at getting gears installed on my 05 V'6er and my local speed mechanic said that 3.73 with the SCT2 is a dramatic difference. What do you think? He is charging $379 for the Xcal2 with 3 generic tunes. Dyno tuning would be necessary for the gears , of course.

What will I be gaining and what will I be trading off (or loosing) by going with 3.73?? Also does the gears void my warranty?

BTW he said geras with P&L is about $425 (not including dyno)

Whats your opinion?? I am looking at getting some work done this weekend - if anything atleast the Xcal2.... Get rid of that throttle lag once and for all!!! lol

Old Sep 29, 2005 | 12:12 PM
  #2  
jthorn9's Avatar
jthorn9
The Godfather
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 15,480
From: Temple, Texas
Default RE: 3.73 or lower?

Go to the post about the supercharger, its in this forum, there on page 2 you'll see exactly why new gears are better than stock and you'll see other ways to tune your car. Now yes you will need a tuner, diablo makes one of the best around so look on ebay and see if they have any for sale for your generation, if not, got to mustang tuning, or rpmoutlet.com, they will cost you $399. I don't remeber how much I said on that post about a t-lok differential, but you will need this to so that you can transfer your added power to both wheels instead of just one, thats right, v6s are only powered by the back right wheel, not both wheel, this will fix the proble. But go to that post and you will learn a lot. After you read my text there, if you have any questions, just ask.
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 05:05 PM
  #3  
mustangman02232's Avatar
mustangman02232
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,865
From: Ludlow, Mass
Default RE: 3.73 or lower?

get motive 3.90s or 4.10s, if its just a weekend car and not a DD get motive 4.30s, so many ppl have said they kick themselfes in the **** for not going higher than 3.73s, and you already have 3.31s. Thats like me doing 3.55s in my 02 with 3.27s, not worth it.
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 06:14 PM
  #4  
Hurricane Stang's Avatar
Hurricane Stang
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 56
Default RE: 3.73 or lower?

i haven't ordered it yet but i heard that the xcal2 with programming from lidio at alternative auto is pretty good i don't know the link just search for the website, thats what i heard from a few people and its easy to install cause you just plug it into a port thats underneath the steer wheel near the door...but i have no experience with this system just heard good things
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 08:37 PM
  #5  
scrming's Avatar
scrming
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,750
From:
Default RE: 3.73 or lower?

ok... first hand experience here....

I've got Lidio's tune... I did not orginally purchase my X-Cal2 from him... but I bought his tunes later... They are incredible... Lidio's 89 Octane tune shaved .25 off my 0-60 time vs the 93 Octane tune I was running... Lidio's tune is simply much more complete. And you should here the tires chirp on the shifts... LOL! My other tunes certianly didn't do that!

Link to ALt Auto V6

Now.. for gears... if you do any long trips on the expressway I would stick with the 3.73s. With the 4.10s at 80 MPH you'll be at 3,000 RPM (maybe a little more or less)... Personally I don't want to drive at 3000RPM for a long period... I have the 4.10s but I'm not running a stock tire either... My tires are taller than stock... I just got some new tires today... slightly smaller than what I was running... but still taller than stock... Haven't been on the e-way yet.. The 4.10s are fun though for going from stop light to stop light!!! So you'll have to figure out what makes the most sense for you... the 3.73 may be good fit if you regulary drive over 70MPH...

If you are going to do the gear... spend the extra money and get a limited slip differntial while your at it... I have the Ford Trac-Lock... all i can say is way cool! LOL!

Old Oct 3, 2005 | 11:25 PM
  #6  
MustangScott's Avatar
MustangScott
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 128
From: California
Default RE: 3.73 or lower?

BTW how much did the actual tunes cost?
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 11:30 PM
  #7  
scrming's Avatar
scrming
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,750
From:
Default RE: 3.73 or lower?

ORIGINAL: MustangScott

BTW how much did the actual tunes cost?
was not the cheapest... We also did some custom work for my MMR intake..... Best bet is to give Lidio a call and get the latest pricing from him.... www.alternativeauto.com
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 11:32 PM
  #8  
MustangScott's Avatar
MustangScott
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 128
From: California
Default RE: 3.73 or lower?

Alraight. Do you think a different filter cone would fit on the tube? Hehe, I like the tube, but hate that there is no heatshield.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lincolnshibuya
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
4
Jul 5, 2020 03:05 AM
baddog671
Archive - Parts For Sale
20
Jul 26, 2016 01:20 PM
UrS4
S197 Handling Section
10
Oct 3, 2015 06:23 AM
uedlose
The Racers Bench
4
Oct 1, 2015 08:31 PM
NYstang
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
1
Sep 30, 2015 09:56 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:48 AM.