Wheels & Tires Discuss rims and tires here.

Not a clue

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 23, 2016 | 03:48 AM
  #1  
D00m3dHitm4n's Avatar
D00m3dHitm4n
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 61
From: IL
Default Not a clue

I own a 2015 PP Mustang GT, and I'm trying to find replacement tires for it. I really wanted to Nitto NT555 extreme summer performance tires for it, because I had an incredible experience with them when I owned them on my 2012 GT. They had great all around traction and great tread life (they lasted nearly 60k miles). The issue I'm running into is that Nitto does not make them in the 275/40/19 and 255/40/19 size that the 15' PP GT requires.

Can I get away with running 275/35/19 in the rear and 245/35/19 in the front? What is the worse case scenario with going with these tires?

What tires (size and brand) would you guys recommend that also have great tread life and great traction?
Old Jan 24, 2016 | 02:22 PM
  #2  
Norm Peterson's Avatar
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,635
From: state of confusion
Default

Those 35 profile tires are going to be at least an inch shorter than your OE 40-series tires. Most people don't want to add more tire to fender gap.

Honestly, I'd go straight to Michelin's Pilot Super Sport tires and never look back. They should be available in your GT/PP's OE sizes. I was datalogging over 1.2g in the corners at my last road course track day after they'd come up to temperature, they ride extremely well especially with respect to their performance capability, and as far as rain capabilities are concerned . . . well, I've got a rainy track day video for you (about 2" fell that day). WOT in 3rd, 40 or better through the slowest corner just past the bridge, and rock-steady at speeds up to and a little beyond 110. Note the tire size, 30mm wider up front, 10mm wider out back, than the S550 GT/PP.




But if you're still stuck with lots of brand loyalty to Nitto, the tire of theirs that you want is the NT555 G2. A better tire than the "regular" NT555 for sure (which was already an 'old' tire in 2010), and it also comes in your car's OE sizes.


Norm

Last edited by Norm Peterson; Jan 24, 2016 at 02:51 PM.
Old Jan 25, 2016 | 02:21 AM
  #3  
D00m3dHitm4n's Avatar
D00m3dHitm4n
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 61
From: IL
Default

My only question would be, what's the tread life on the Michelin Pilot SS tires? I loved the fact that I got nearly 60k miles out of the nittos.

Originally Posted by Norm Peterson
Those 35 profile tires are going to be at least an inch shorter than your OE 40-series tires. Most people don't want to add more tire to fender gap.

Honestly, I'd go straight to Michelin's Pilot Super Sport tires and never look back. They should be available in your GT/PP's OE sizes. I was datalogging over 1.2g in the corners at my last road course track day after they'd come up to temperature, they ride extremely well especially with respect to their performance capability, and as far as rain capabilities are concerned . . . well, I've got a rainy track day video for you (about 2" fell that day). WOT in 3rd, 40 or better through the slowest corner just past the bridge, and rock-steady at speeds up to and a little beyond 110. Note the tire size, 30mm wider up front, 10mm wider out back, than the S550 GT/PP.


Abbreviated Wet Session with 285 35 18 Michelin PSS - YouTube


But if you're still stuck with lots of brand loyalty to Nitto, the tire of theirs that you want is the NT555 G2. A better tire than the "regular" NT555 for sure (which was already an 'old' tire in 2010), and it also comes in your car's OE sizes.


Norm
Old Jan 25, 2016 | 08:30 AM
  #4  
Norm Peterson's Avatar
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,635
From: state of confusion
Default

The PSS carries the same 300 treadwear rating as the NT555 does. I know they aren't directly comparable, but they shouldn't be s misleading that you only get half as many miles out of them driving the same way.

When I last checked the tread wear on mine, I'd only lost about 2/32" of tread. That was from over 3000 fairly enthusiastic street miles and about 1000 track miles (which are maybe 10 times as abusive as the street miles). In street-only use and my driving, I'd expect to get at least 35,000 miles out of them.

It's great that you could get 60k from yours, but I'd never let a high number like that drive my tire choice.


Norm
Old Jan 25, 2016 | 12:27 PM
  #5  
D00m3dHitm4n's Avatar
D00m3dHitm4n
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 61
From: IL
Default

I have one other small question... if I wanted to go wider than 275 in the rear, what's the biggest size could I go with?


Originally Posted by Norm Peterson
The PSS carries the same 300 treadwear rating as the NT555 does. I know they aren't directly comparable, but they shouldn't be s misleading that you only get half as many miles out of them driving the same way.

When I last checked the tread wear on mine, I'd only lost about 2/32" of tread. That was from over 3000 fairly enthusiastic street miles and about 1000 track miles (which are maybe 10 times as abusive as the street miles). In street-only use and my driving, I'd expect to get at least 35,000 miles out of them.

It's great that you could get 60k from yours, but I'd never let a high number like that drive my tire choice.


Norm
Old Jan 25, 2016 | 12:59 PM
  #6  
Norm Peterson's Avatar
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,635
From: state of confusion
Default

9" wide wheels limit you to 275/40's, 9.5" gets you 285/xx. You will find people who'll go up another width size on either or both of those wheel widths, but that's outside recommended guidelines and ends up sacrificing some steering response and precision all of the time even if the peak ultimate cornering grip goes up a hundredth of a lateral g or two (which you might not ever actually take advantage of).


Norm
Old Jan 28, 2016 | 01:16 PM
  #7  
D00m3dHitm4n's Avatar
D00m3dHitm4n
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 61
From: IL
Default

If I changed to a 285 in the rear would i need to go down to 35 for the sidewall height?
Old Jan 28, 2016 | 04:23 PM
  #8  
Norm Peterson's Avatar
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,635
From: state of confusion
Default

Depends on whether you want a tire that's a little over 1/4" taller than OE (285/40-19) or a little more than 3/4" shorter (285/35-19).


Norm
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NorthAmericanTuning
Vendor For Sale / Group Buy Classifieds
3
Aug 17, 2016 09:24 AM
coffeebowl
S197 Handling Section
12
Apr 11, 2016 01:05 PM
MustangForums Editor
Mustang Videos
1
Nov 1, 2015 04:42 AM
RLowIndy
S197 Handling Section
3
Oct 27, 2015 07:05 AM
NorthAmericanTuning
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
0
Oct 26, 2015 12:45 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:17 PM.